Enter Honest John's Kit Competition An awesome prize is up for grabs every week | No thanks

Honest John's Motoring Agony Column 30-12-2017 Part 1

Published 29 December 2017

This week’s mechanical mayhem involves a clutch of clutches, PFI exploits, puncture disrepair, rental arithmetic, fluidics and a full score more. 

As usual, emails to Honest John should be addressed to: letters@honestjohn.co.uk  Please try to keep them as short as possible.

  

Driven to dis-traction

I am concerned about the clutch in my car failing again three weeks after a Ford dealer charged me £900 for a new dry clutch mechanism and flywheel. The dealer claimed I had travelled 9,000 miles in those three weeks, which I know is not true. In line with ISO standards, the dealer should have a published complaints procedure. It is inappropriate for a complaint to be investigated by the person who is being complained about. I have also mentioned a complaint not being passed on at 2nd November and an e-mail being sent to an address, that I have never previously used. As you will appreciate, all of this only adds to my suspicion about what has happened here. I have already submitted a query to the Motor Ombudsman. I want this matter resolved, but at the same time I will need the concerns to be investigated before I can consider collecting my car or making any additional payment.

NB, via email

You have advice from the Motor Ombudsman that an independent check of the clutch would not be able to tell if it had burned out from misuse or from a fault with its installation. The clutch was replaced for the first time in December 2015. The clutch fitted at that time then lasted until September 2017. The replacement clutch fitted in September 2017 only lasted 1,000 miles until October 2017 driven by the same person who can prove the mileage driven (you). For the car to have been driven 9,000 miles in the period it would need to have been driven 2,000 miles a week, which is 400 miles per working day. The way to settle this is to pay the bill to get the car back, then sue the dealer for the cost of the 2nd replacement clutch using Small Claims. https://www.gov.uk/make-court-claim-for-money But first tell dealer’s legal team that is what you propose to do.

Peugeot 208 3 Door F34 Moving

Judderall blanked

Regarding my Peugeot 208 with the "juddering" problem on starting off, guess what? New engine mounts were fitted and this had no discernible effect. However, when the vehicle was road tested following the work, the mechanic experienced the juddering problem. When I presented myself to collect the vehicle, the Service Manager came out of the back office, admitted that there is indeed a clutch problem and as this had been reported during the warranty period it would indeed be fixed at no charge to me. "Photos will have to be sent to Coventry" The car has been re-booked for a fortnight's time and will apparently be held for 4 days while the work is done. I will have the use of a courtesy car during that period. Will advise you of the final outcome.

CC, via email

Many thanks for the heads up. The dealer must have a policy of "cheapest fix first", even if it's the wrong fix.

 

Hospital mistreatment

I write to ask that you alert your readers to a big problem in the UK with parking. I received a £70 parking fine by North Somerset Council when I should not have. There was no signage visible or cones or a restriction to parking permit holders only. They say all this was there, but will not give me any evidence. I have now put all this to a traffic tribunal. Can we have free parking at all hospitals?  

KP, Gloucester

The problem is the way hospitals are financed under the Private Finance Initiative that leaves the hospitals themselves in the hands of private investors with enormous greed and no morals who regard the sick and dying as infinitely exploitable. This can only end with the re-nationalisation of hospital premises, which is part of the Labour Party manifesto. This tells you all about it: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/labour-pfi-john-mcdonnell-scheme-government-hospitals-private-finance-initiative-party-conference-a7966521.html / (The issue was raised in the national news over the Christmas holiday period. NHS hospital trusts claimed that revenue from hospital parking and parking penalties was channelled directly back into hospital funds.)

Mazda 6 Kwik Fit Harrogate (1) 

Punctured ego

I'm really sorry to hear that a tyre repair kit ended up costing you £256 for a new tyre, plus the Wetherby Services overstay penalty that you refused to pay. If you have time it would be really great to know if the mechanic tried to wash the product out or if there was another reason why they felt it had ruined the tyres? Apologies for pressing on this. It would just be great to get to the bottom of the issue you had with the product as we see so many mechanics who dismiss it as damaging tyres when this isn't the case (but of course appreciate there could have been other factors in your case).

MD, Holt

The tyre had to be plugged by the RAC to get to Kwik-Fit because the glop spurted out and that and the mess inside the carcass wrote it off. Where do you get the idea that tyre fitters will spend time washing out tyre carcasses that then may or may not hold air? The car had not been driven on a flat tyre. Still had 20psi in it when I went through the failed procedure to add the glop. Scores of readers have had the same experience with these optimistically labelled ‘tyre repair kits’. 95% of the time they simply don’t work and leave the driver in a worse mess than if he had called out the AA or RAC in the first place.

 

Car ire

I have a house in Spain, which I visit 3 or 4 times a year. While there I normally hire a car and collect it from the airport. I usually try to avoid the "hard sell" on extra insurance that the rental companies try to persuade you to take out, but once or twice I have been pressurised into buying it. In the 14 years we have owned our house in Spain, we have never had need to use car insurance. As I understand it, all cars in Spain have to be insured themselves; the driver having no bearing on the insurance policy. Therefore, when I collect a car from the airport, it will automatically be insured already, and there is no need for me to take out extra insurance. Or am I getting this completely wrong? Is it best to accept the offer of insurance (which is the same price as the car hire cost, effectively doubling the total cost), or is this a rip-off? I'd appreciate your advice.

JR, via email

In common with virtually everywhere in the World apart from the UK, cars in Spain are insured for 3rd party risks driven by any driver. The collision damage and theft waiver you pay extra for is not covered by the basic insurance. I don't pay extra for it either. In Thailand, the maximum they can hit you for damage over 28 days is actually less than the cost of the CDW, so I don't bother. But they are a bit more venal about it in Europe.

BMW 140i 3 Door Side 2015 

“Life” threatening

Last December, I bought a new BMW M140i, which has a 3-litre turbocharged 340HP engine. The dashboard indicator tells me it needs its first service in December 2018, at approx 21,000 miles. This means that the engine will be exactly two years old before it gets its first oil change, which concerns me as it seems to ignore the general guidance that oil services should be done after about 10,000 miles or one year, whichever comes first. When I bought the car, I took out a 5-year service plan but have been told by BMW that they will not pay for an oil change before the service indicator tells them to. I had the same problem with the M135i I owned previously.  In that instance I paid for an "early" oil service after the first year.  Should I do the same again or should I trust the BMW schedule?

BHD, via email

Definitely do the same again. Change the oil and filter at least every year or every 10k miles whichever comes first. Unlike the USA and even countries like Thailand, there is no culture of ‘lube shops’ in the UK, where you can simply roll up for an on the spot oil and filter change for a reasonable price (£50 for ‘fully synthetic’ 10W-40 + filter in Thailand). There should be, and carmakers should be compelled to acknowledge these as within warranty and also supply the data to lube shops to cancel out ‘on board’ service indicators when these lube jobs are carried out. Very necessary, of course, for the car owner to keep a detailed invoice showing that the correct oil and filter were used.

  

One fluid over the cuckoo’s nest

I thought you would be interested to hear of my discussion with Volkswagen’s Customer service department. They checked the VIN number and confirmed that my DSG unit is ‘sealed for life’ and simply said that an authorised VW dealer therefore could not change the oil. When questioned as to how they had managed to change the oil in the synthetic recall, he stated that he was “unable to comment on foreign recalls” and there had been no such recall of my vehicle in the UK. When I pointed out that their own advice is to change the oil as dirty oil causes problems he said that was not applicable to a sealed for life gearbox. I stressed that I was not trying to make a claim and that I wanted to pay to have the oil changed to prevent a problem but he simply said it was not within the scope of an authorised VW dealer and that “all parts can fail.” Not a very helpful response from a company suffering from emissions problems. I will now find a VAG independent. Shame, really. 

MH, via email

That's a dealer in denial. I have emails from scores of readers whose cars DQ200 DSGs were recalled to change the fluid in them from synthetic to mineral. And scores more from readers who’s DQ200 DSGs continue to fail. I would guess that the your DQ200 DSG was built after the fluid conductivity problems was discovered, so came filled with mineral fluid, which begs the question why were these transmission filled with synthetic fluid in the first place? The answer to that has to be because mineral oil was not thought to last for “life.”

BMW E46 M3 CS F34 Retouched

Difference of a pinion

I purchased a 2002 BMW M3 from a local independent dealer and took delivery in on August 1st, 2017. I only used it occasionally as it is a second car but it ran well. About 3 weeks ago I noticed a noise that appeared to be coming from the rear axle, so took it to my local garage who confirmed it is coming from the differential and the cost of a replacement / reconditioned diff will be around £1,900. The car cost £9,200 and garage had offered me a 3-month warranty but now are not returning my calls. Do they have an obligation to repair this?  

JF, via email

It's within the 6 months of dealer liability for problems that could have been present or developing prior to purchase, so yes: /faq/consumer-rights/

 

Declining circulation

My Dacia Logan MCV has let cold air into the foot wells ever since I bought it new in 2015. It’s a bit of a saga, so I have attached details of the problem and the mechanic’s report. I just want the problem to stop. Looking forward to hearing from you.

FB, via email

The mechanic answered it: “Carried out additional tests for cold air coming into the foot well; this included testing at speed. Found cool air coming in from speaker due to the air being on recycle and the fan pointing at the screen. This draws air into the foot well. No defect found.” Try running the heating on fresh air, not recirculate. Quite a lot of cars these days do leave your knees comparatively cold. The New G01 BMW X3 we drove from Malaga to Heathrow last weekend did, though not by enough to upset me.

Suzuki Ignis 2017 F34 Blue 

Swinging a cat

I have a sixties house and garage in which I keep my 1991 Ford Fiesta. I was considering buying the new model but have discovered that it is wider than my current car, which only just fits into the garage. Can you suggest another car that is similar to the Fiesta or will I have to park a new one outside?

PB, Stafford

Take a look at a KIA Picanto, a Hyundai i10, a Suzuki Celario, a Suzuki Ignis and a Vauxhall Viva.

 

Stopping smoking

I am a miscreant who has driven diesels privately since 1983. Goodness knows how much NOx is in my system. I tend to trade in every 2.5 to 3 years and my Euro 6 Beetle Sport, which has served me very well, is due to be changed. I have succumbed to the scientific evidence and have been looking at hybrids with the Audi A-3 e-tron, MINI Countryman PHEV, and BMW 225xe under consideration. However, I have a nagging reservation that hybrids themselves are a stop-gap with manufacturers seeming to be pushing for full electric power with greatly enhanced range in 18 months to 2 years time to the exclusion of improving hybrids, which might then be consigned to the “naughty” step. Development seems to be rattling along at a pace and It might therefore be better to wait for 12 to 18 months to see how Messrs Dyson, etc. influence so called 'clean motoring'. Any thoughts?

CS, Exeter

Big business is now moving into electricity storage in batteries that have finite lives. That means the electric car will have a life of 7 - 10 years before the capacity of the battery is so reduced the car will have a very limited range. It's a potentially huge moneyspinner because no longer will car owners be able to eke out the lives of their cars to 10, 15 or 20 years. They will have to scrap them at 7 - 10 years old or spend more then the car is worth on new batteries. The truth is that there is a lot more life left in petrol hybrids, so those are the cars to go for. See this: /carbycar/bmw#used /

BMW E39 5-Series Side 700

Famous Five?

I’m looking to buy 5 year+ BMW. I would to know whether you could recommend the most reliable, bomb-proof car /engine combinations? I don’t mind petrol or diesel. Six-cylinders and automatic, please. I have heard good things about the E39 5-Series, but the newest ones are still 14 years old. 

VS, via email

Read the Good/Bad sections for each model here: /carbycar/bmw#used / Note that once cars get past about 10 years old, readers generally stop complaining about faults because they expect them, so a low number of complaints against an older car does not mean that car was generally reliable.

 

Soggy carpets

I have a 2009 Volvo C30 R-Design and over the last year have found water in the driver’s footwell after periods of heavy rain. I have checked the drain is clear of leaves and debris, and if I pour water into that area it seems that it comes out in the offside front tyre area from behind the inner wheel arch covering. Could I perhaps have a blockage in this drain area somewhere that is enabling the water to come into the car or is there another possible cause for this problem? I mentioned it to my local garage at its last service and the manager thought it might be a problem with the windscreen seal.  If the latter then I presume it could be solved by getting a windscreen replacement company to remove the windscreen and reseal it. I would appreciate your feedback and any advice to help resolve this problem.

PP, via email

You have sensibly checked that the bulkhead vent well drains are clear. Next thing is to check the pollen filter gasket and cover. I once had a severe leak into a SEAT Leon and the reason turned out to be a badly re-fitted pollen filter cover after the pollen filter had been replaced during a service.

Hon Accord Sal Y Reg Side 700

Handle barred

I own a 2002 1.8 Honda Accord Sport It has been a brilliant family saloon with the best power steering ever. Unfortunately, the driver’s door now refuses to open from the outside. Would you have any idea what would be causing this and would it be very expensive to put right?

IH, Wolverhampton

The first thing to do is pop out the grommet in the lock face of the driver's door and squirt the lock servo and mechanism liberally with WD40. If that doesn't free it off, it's a matter of sourcing a used lock mechanism, which will probably mean buying an entire driver's door from a breaker: /useful-websites/parts-accessories-car-care-tools-tyres/

 

Vengance is mine

Having read your comments on LandRover tyre noise, last Saturday, I hope for possible help for my Venga. Its tyres are Continental, Conti Premium Contact 2E 205/55 R 16 91 H. Very noisy at over 40mph/ Any suggestions please? 

NH, via email

You can get Michelin Cross Climates in that size. Will improve your car in every respect: more compliant ride, better steering feel, less road noise, no increase in fuel consumption or tyre wear, plus the cold weather benefits. List price £100 per tyre but may be discounted.

BMW F34 3 Gran Turismo Side Shut

Beaming with satisfaction

I drive about 12,000 - 15,000 miles a year, including at least 2 trips of 800 miles each way to the South of France. We currently have a BMW 320i Touring and I like the way BMW's drive. We have a dog, so require space. I prefer petrol and an automatic gearbox, but could be persuaded otherwise. I am shortly due to retire, so would like something to last me for a few years and would be prepared to spend between £20,000-£30,000. What would you suggest?

TB, via email

I like the BMW 3-Series GT and you can get that with various petrol engines from 2.0 litres up: /road-tests/bmw/bmw-318d-gran-turismo-2014-road-test/ You should be able to get a nearly new or ex-demo within budget. Otherwise a BMW X1 xDrive 20i on sensible wheels and tyres.

 

Shouldn’t have gone to Specsavers

Although I appreciate that this is not quite your field we would appreciate your comments. My husband has glaucoma and he advised the DVLA three years ago and after tests at Specsavers he was granted a licence. He recently applied to renew his licence and was again sent to Specsavers, but subsequently received a letter from the DVLA stating that, from information they had received, my husband could not read a registration plate from 20 metres so must not drive. He was certain that this was incorrect and subsequently tested himself several times with various witnesses who all agreed he had no problem. Fortunately, he was due for his annual eye test with our regular optician and she also confirmed his capability of reading the number plate and gave him his prescription along with her notes substantiating this and these were sent to the DVLA first class on 1st of November. My husband did not hear from them until 22nd November when they sent him an application form for a new licence along with three other forms requesting medical details (similar to forms he had completed initially) and apparently these could take another three weeks to process. We live in a rural area with no public transport passing through our village and unfortunately I have been unwell, have not completely recovered and do not drive in the dark.  This has meant and will continue to mean for a while that we have to call on the help of family, causing them untold inconvenience and expense and at the same time cancelling various appointments and social occasions to which we had been looking forward. We feel this is unfair when the reason given for banning my husband from driving is unequivocally untrue. I would add that at the ages of 80 and 82 we expect we may not be able to drive for many more years and, with family, have started to plan for this eventuality but at the present our general health is good and my husband's glaucoma is not causing him any problems so this ban has been quite devastating and not of our making.

VD, via email

Threaten to sue Specsavers for the libel damages of your taxi fares due to their gross negligence until your husband gets his licence back again. Give notice to them now and state that you will not know the precise amount until your husband gets his license back. Offer them the chance of supplying the taxi rides directly. Small Claims: https://www.gov.uk/make-court-claim-for-money/

Ren Clio III 06 3dr Side 700

Asset stripping

I've just inherited by father's 2007 Renault Clio Initiale 1.6i. He's owned it since new and, given how little he used to drive it (averaging 1,500 miles a year), he never bothered giving it anything like a major service. What would you recommend it needs to guarantee it keeps going?

MD, via email

Full going over by a good local garage. Get them to list and price everything they think needs doing before giving the go ahead. At least engine oil and filter, air filter, pollen filter, brake fluid, coolant, coolant pipes, timing belt, water pump, tensioner, alternator belt and probably brake pads and discs.

 

Jeep works out expensive

I had the annual service for my Jeep last April. The dealer advised me that brake pads needed changing and also safer to do discs to save money. While I was getting the MoT I was advised about the pads. I took my car to the same MoT people few weeks ago and asked to change pads and discs. They checked measurements and said there is still life in the discs but the rear pads needed changing and changed them. The rest I was advised were OK for few months. I have known these people for years and I trust them. Does it sound OK? The dealer wanted more than £1,000 for repairs.

KA, via email

The worn and grooved discs will wear out the brake pads prematurely so that was the reason for the Jeep dealer's advice (as well as to make a bit of money).

Click to Honest John’s Motoring Agony Column 30-12-2017 Part 2

Comments

TTToommy    on 29 December 2017

free hospital parking wanted ? the "profit" from car parking buys more drugs and more nurses, in Wales we have free parking and free prescriptions for all and despite a slightly larger budget per "customer" the welsh NHS has no specialist stroke centres,no reumatology speciality units and 5 years ago I know there were around 25 life saving and life extending drugs which all english NHS trusts could afford but deemed too expensive for the Welsh NHS - now is free parking such a benefit?

Edited by TTToommy on 29/12/2017 at 17:58

beatbox    on 30 December 2017

A little something for your readers to share from VW America.

After years of selling overrated and dodgy motors of questionable quality (6 months warranty for shock absorbers, useless DSG gearboxes, emission cheating etc).

In an effort to cheers the Americans up..........

"Volks, then wagen. People, then car.

That’s our philosophy, and that means being there for our customers long after they drive off the lot.

That’s why we offer America’s Best Car and SUV Bumper-to-Bumper Transferable Warranty on almost all of our 2018 models.

The Volkswagen 6 years/72,000 Miles New Vehicle Limited Warranty. It’s perfect for America’s best customers."

But here in the U.K.... We get fobbed off, just put up with their poor customer services and their junk motors !

Edited by beatbox on 30/12/2017 at 19:08

HairyJones    on 2 January 2018

There's a very easy answer for you and other readers. You don't have to buy ANY VW Group cars, VW, Audi, Seat, Skoda, etc. There are many, many far better cars out there.

masiv    on 31 December 2017

I'm a regular visitor to 3 different hospitals in Wales and can assure you that parking is absolutely NOT free.

TTToommy    on 31 December 2017

interesting, are they town centres?

greenock mist    on 31 December 2017

NHS - free at the point of use - you cannot even get in the front door without paying these days.

The parking policy of the NHS in many cases, leads to the displacement of vehicles outwith the footprint of the hospital causing issues for those who happen to live or operate a business nearby requiring potential intervention by the police and / or local authorities.

This is one NHS settlement that does not make sense. As you collect the parking fees, you are inconviencing the NHS staff and patients / visitors. The creators of such policy do not live in the real world.

Engineer Andy    on 5 January 2018

NHS - free at the point of use - you cannot even get in the front door without paying these days. The parking policy of the NHS in many cases, leads to the displacement of vehicles outwith the footprint of the hospital causing issues for those who happen to live or operate a business nearby requiring potential intervention by the police and / or local authorities. This is one NHS settlement that does not make sense. As you collect the parking fees, you are inconviencing the NHS staff and patients / visitors. The creators of such policy do not live in the real world.

The problem is that many hospitals, especially in our major cities, are close to either/both railway stations and/or shopping areas/work areas, so if the parking WAS free, all that would happen is that commuters, workers (other than at the hospital) and shoppers would (and have done in the past) use the hospital car park all day, leaving little or no spaces for staff and especially genuine visitors, who are often elderly themselves and cannot walk a long distance if they have to park on residential roads (most of which are now 'residents permits only' areas).

My answer would be for:

  1. Staff get their own car parks, but are only given 'priority' permits if they work shift work when public transport isn't running. One major problem these days (not just in the public sector) is that increasingly people are working further away from their place of work, often in 'domitory' towns and villages with no train station and often little in the way of useable (often only one bus an hour) bus services. I would have no problem in the government building decent, subsidised housing for Public Sector workers in key lines of work (NHS medical staff, fire, police, school teachers, armed forces) - it was a stupid idea to sell of much of what we previously had, but ONLY if their wages were reduced accordingly - after all, supposedly people do these jobs as a 'vocation', not just as a money spinner. As such, the amount of staff requiring to use their car would drastically reduce as most would live more locally and either walk, cycle, get the bus and/or train to work.
  2. Visitors/patients could be encouraged to use public transport by enabling some kind of voucher system (assuming they could use it) to get money off trips, which could be signed off by hospital personnel for a limited period. Other than that, the same system that some shopping centres and retail parks use in the US by having the facility 'validate' your parking ticket (they'd have to produce the patient's unique number and visitor's NI number to do so and could only be done once a day per person) at reception via a machine/card reader (NI cards could be used for this purpose, and would also reduce fraud via foreigners trying it on).
  3. Have different areas for short (say up to 3-4 hrs) and longer-term visitor/patient parking, like in shopping centre car parks. Make sure the deifnitions/areas of each were VERY clear, including the price. Charge a reasonable price (TBA) for both, making sure those parking in the short-term car park know that they will either have to move to the long-term car park before the (say) 4 hrs is up (print the deadline on the ticket given at entry) to avoid much higher charges. Don't penalise people who can genuinely explain why they haven't moved the car (taken ill themselves or the person they are visiting has taken a turn for the worse/died or some other unforeseen event intervenes), but keep a record in case people 'try it on' with false sob stories.
  4. Make sure that planned visits by contractors, etc are properly planned to accommodate all vehicles (I know this doesn't happen from personal experience) in secure, legal and affordable areas, and that they don't take large swathes of the car parks (e.g. construction project staff) - temporary car/van/HGV parks may be needed and must be marshalled to stop abuse.
  5. Where possible/necessary , increase public transport to such places. My local hospital (Addenbrookes in Cambridge) may well (about time too) be getting its own train station (though its still far enough from the track to need a shuttle bus, but both would be very well used and would easily be viable over the longer term) to reduce reliance on personal car travel. Only build new hospitals where public transport is either already more than sufficient or can easily be upgraded to avoid huge amounts of extra road traffic.
  6. Revenue from parking to only be used for the upkeep of and improvements to such facilities and to reasonably improve public transport to the facility to take pressure off roads and reduce the need for expansion of car park facilities. Nothing for medical use or towards 'pet projects'. Its not there (as VED and fuel taxes are [which they shouldn't be]) to subsidise the general running of the hospital, which, to me at least, encourages inefficiency and waste. No should ANY of the revenues go towards paying off PFI contracts.

I personally disagree with HJ (if he is 'supporting such a measure) to make car parks free as per Corbyn's Hard Left Labour party policy. Like much of their policies, they would be paid for by the taxpayer, which they (as usual) haven't said anything about. The REAL possible solutions, as I've described above (I'm sure others can come with others/alternatives) are far more appropriate and cost far less. Voting for them or advocating 'just' renationalising sin't, in my view, the way forward.

colinh    on 31 December 2017

"...I have a nagging reservation that hybrids themselves are a stop-gap..."

20 years and 10 million hybrids sold by Toyota - some stop-gap. Virtually every other manufacturer has started production or development of "mild" or "plug-in" hybrids

   on 31 December 2017

interesting article regarding emissions and emission testing.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/how_toxic_is_y...t

jchinuk    on 31 December 2017

Having worked in the NHS since the 70s till I retired last year, I can assure you that some hospitals charged for parking, which usually includes staff, well before the dubious benefits of PFI contracts. The usual reason was to discourage commuters and shoppers filling the 'free' spaces by 8:30 on weekday mornings, leaving patients and visitors unable to park. The (now gone) site I worked at was across the road from the rail station to Liverpool Street, so commuters regarded it as the station car park.
Once you start any form of regulation of a car park, it costs something, therefore unless there is a charge it costs the site owner money, so charging something is unavoidable on hospital sites.
The local polyclinic has free parking, but users have to log their reg. number to avoid a charge, yet people still forget and moan when they get a bill.
The local PFI acute hospital has an additional issue, staff passes (which are not cheap) are restricted and there are more passes than staff parking bays. The effect is that local side streets are full of nurses' cars, annoying the neighbours.
Apparently recent planning rules are intended to encourage people to use public transport or cycle, forgetting that a nurse coming off shift at 11:00pm might not have the option of a bus.

trefordian    on 31 December 2017

Re Hospital mistreatment: The Private Finance Initiative was a small-scale scheme started by the Thatcher government.
Then along came a shallow New Labour petty thief and bully of butterfly judgement posing as an intellectual, Gordon Brown (new book out now).
With his equally shallow enemy, Tony Blair, they connived, for once, to pervert the PFI's original intent to go on a vast spending spree - all hidden from the public spending accounts(!). We are still paying for their devil-may-care stupidity and will for generations to come.
These two Britpop mugs, with bovine deliberation, opened the gates to the pitiless forces of capitalism which have ravaged this country for the past 20 years. Which is when I stopped being a lifelong Labour voter.
So, the Labour Party is wholly to blame for the scandalous PFI mess and no one on the Honest John website should believe otherwise.

Chris C    on 1 January 2018

A bit more than small scale... PFI's are appalling value for money but Labour left office in 2010 and the Tories have continued with more PFI's in the subsequent 8 years....

Engineer Andy    on 5 January 2018

A bit more than small scale... PFI's are appalling value for money but Labour left office in 2010 and the Tories have continued with more PFI's in the subsequent 8 years....

The difference Chris is that the Tories (however poorly many of us think of the current lot [far better than the alternative, which says a LOT about both sides]) would bother to look over the contracts, unlike Labour, before agreeing to them. Many signed by NuLabour were (like the GP contracts) so far biased (financially and regarding penalties for poor service or overcharging for work/items) towards the firms taking on the contract that they were, in effect, a licence to print money with little risk on their side - most, as we've seen, was on the taxpayers' side.

Whilst I'm sure Corbyn didn't support PFIs ever, he did so for ideological reasons (he hates everything about the private sector - after all he and McDonnell are confirmed Marxists), and not because he had any idea that the contracts were biased (because it was quicker and easier to do, and, perhaps [in my view] cushy as 'former' politicians could then get jobs in firms linked to the industry after retiring as MPs in return [no proof, but I wouldn't be surprised, given previous 'form', especially from NuLab]).

If the contracts (1997-2010 - far, far more and worse than the Tories ever did before or after) had been negotiated thoroughly and honestly, we wouldn't be in the financial mess as regards NHS funding we're currently in (and even then, much is due to poor local management, which is VERY difficult to remove [unions/politics] and replace due to the poor quality crop available [its like a merry-go-round outside of the private sector for rubbish staff]).

There's no way McDonnell can force these contracts to be null and void without the government (us) being sued for hundreds of £Bns in compensation (and quite rightly - they are binding contracts in LAW) and/or, if forced to get out without compensation by forcing through new laws, would mean that outward investment (including financing government bonds and gilts - borrowing) would subsequently, and VERY quickly become as expensive (or even impossible) as that experienced in hardline socialist countries such as Venezuela and, previously, in Argentina. In wonder how they're doing (especially the former)?

Add a comment

 

Ask Honest John

Value my car

Amount to borrow
Sorry. The minimum loan amount is £1000
To pay back over

My credit score

Best available rate 9.20%

Total repayment £9,304.93

Total cost of credit £1,804.93

£155.08

60 monthly payments

Apply now

Representative example

The Representative APR is 13.2% (fixed) so if you borrow £7,500 over 4 years at a rate of 13.2% p.a (fixed) you will repay £199.21 per month and repay £9562.20 in total.