Enter Honest John's Kit Competition An awesome prize is up for grabs every week | No thanks

Mercedes-Benz Reviews

New Cars
Good: Completely re-worked A-Class with new petrol engines. Excellent infotainment and tech. Luxurious interior. Improved ride quality.
Bad: Looks similar to 2012 A-Class.
Good: Supercar looks with huge power and gorgeous sound. Incredibly rewarding when driven hard. Rarer than rivals.
Bad: Cabin quality could be better. Jarring ride quality. Lacks steering feel and lacks the sparkle of the Audi R8.
Good: Mercedes-AMG answer to the Porsche Panamera. Available as a hybrid.
Bad: Won't be cheap...
Good: Loads of cabin space front and rear. Lots of safety kit. Engines are all frugal and even the most powerful deliver low CO2 emissions. All electric B Class from Spring 2015.
Bad: Ride too firm in all conditions. Inconsistent steering response undermines driving pleasure. Dash-top information screen could be clearer. 7G-DCT transmission has as many problems as previous model's CVT.
Good: Fabric roof folds down in 20 seconds and works at up to 30mph. Very serene with the top down even at higher speeds. 220 d is economical and reasonably refined.
Bad: Firmer ride than coupe. Small boot.
Good: Elegant and sleek styling. Beautifully judged balance of ride quality and handling. Incredibly refined at high speed. All models get navigation and heated seats. 4Matic available.
Bad: Rear space is as tight as you'd expect.
Good: Fantastic depth of quality. Lovely cabin ambience and improved interior space. Very refined, quiet and composed – even the four-cylinder diesels.
Bad: No 4Matic four-wheel drive models for the UK. Expensive options required to get the best from it. Only a minor luggage space improvement. Unintuitive infotainment interface.
Good: Much improved interior quality. More refined and better to drive than predecessor. 2018 C200 1.5 mild hybrid is impressive and economical. New six-speed manual. Optional £895 Airmatic suspension recommended.
Bad: C220 CDI with automatic gearbox is disappointing.
Good: Most refined and comfortable small van on the market. Big improvement on the Renault Kangoo it's based on. 109 CDI BlueEfficiency returns a claimed 65.7mpg.
Bad: Rival vans are cheaper.
Good: Cheapest way to get a seven-seater Mercedes-Benz. Available with a petrol engine.
Bad: Interior feels dated and unsophisticated compared to Ford Tourneo Connect and Volkswagen Caddy. Feels too much like the Kangoo.
Good: Small and stylish saloon based on the A-Class. Better quality ride. Decent sized boot given its size. Well finished interior. Better looking estate version from 2015.
Bad: Not particularly engaging or rewarding to drive. Rear seats are only really any good for occasional use.
Good: Handsome looking alternative to the standard small estate. Good interior quality. CLA 200 CDI is economical. Boot is surprisingly useful.
Bad: Diesels and 7G DCT automatic don't make for the best combination. Top models are expensive new. Cramped in the back seats.
Good: Same stylish interior as latest E-Class in a lower, more sporty looking body.
Bad: Expensive.
Good: Stunning estate version of the CLS. Has rakish coupe-like looks combined with 'shooting brake' practicality.
Bad: Top models are expensive. Exterior styling will not be to everyone's taste. Isn't the most engaging car to drive. Load space is awkward reach due to low hatch height.
Good: More rugged version of the E-Class Estate with increased ground clearance. Great performance. Wonderfully refined and comfortable.
Bad: Expensive list prices, even compared to the Audi A6 Allroad. Diesel only.
Good: Impressive refinement, solidity and a top quality interior. 2.0 litre four cylinder petrol and diesel engines plus 3.0 litre V6 petrol and diesel
Good: Very refined, plenty of space for a coupe, almost as good as an S-Class Coupe for half the price, brilliant base model diesel engine, lovely looks, beautiful cabin.
Bad: Pricey – especially with options, tall folk will still feel cramped in the back, not as sharp or dramatic as a BMW 6 Series, E 300 petrol doesn’t sound great.
Good: Stylish and well-equipped. Impressive official fuel economy. Has one of the biggest boots in its class.
Bad: More expensive to buy than any of its its premium rivals. Initially only the AMG versions get a petrol engine.
Good: Beautiful cabin design and quality. Lovely high-speed refinement. Very quiet and staggeringly efficient four-cylinder diesel. Futuristic equipment and more spacious than ever
Bad: Lots of safety kit and tech is on the options list, Best-riding air suspension a high-priced option. COMAND system still clunky.
Good: All-new G-Class has much improved interior design. Promises to be better to drive on road.
Bad: Not arriving until later in 2018.
Good: Impressive ride quality. Available with two or four-wheel drive. Good rear passenger and load space. High quality interior finish.
Bad: Lacklustre dual clutch automatic. 220 d noisy and not as good as competitor diesel engines. Driving position not as high as other compact SUVs.
Good: Brilliant ride quality. Sharper to drive than most SUVs. Beautiful cabin design and plenty of interior space. Diesels are quiet.
Bad: Best ride quality is on optional adaptive dampers. High starting price and expensive options. Shallow boot. Lots of reported problems with steering at low speeds.
Good: Excellent refinement and very composed ride quality. Quiet diesel engine. Superb cabin quality. Spacious for rear seat passengers. Capable off-road if need be.
Bad: High price. Best ride quality depends on optional air suspension. COMAND system is still frustrating to use. Four-seat accommodation only. No room for a spare wheel. Lots of reported problems with steering at low speeds.
Good: Luxurious and spacious. One of the most comfortable big seven-seat 4x4 SUVs. Outrageous performance from GLS 63 AMG.
Bad: Expensive to buy and run. Difficult to park due to its colossal size. You have to pay extra for the off-road system.
Good: Surprisingly capable off-road. Luxurious cabin. Impressive V6 diesel.
Bad: Ride can be choppy on poor roads. Boot space on hybrid models is poor. BMW X5 and Volvo XC90 offer better value for money.
Good: Immense road presence. Big improvement on the ML on which it is essentially based. 350d engine offers all the performance you need. Impressive nine-speed automatic.
Bad: Limited rear visibility makes it hard to park. High boot lip isn't ideal for loading pushchairs.
Good: Premium alternative to the standard camper. Plush interior will sleep four. Electric sliding door and tailgate fitted as standard.
Bad: High starting price, automatic only, quality of optional side awning could be better.
Good: Amazingly quiet, comfortable and refined. Beautifully finished cabin. Tastefully designed and of course very quick.
Bad: Poor rear seat space. High price and running costs matched by far cheaper Mercedes-Benz models in many ways. Dated-looking infotainment.
Good: Sleek successor to CL bursting with high tech features. S63 AMG Coupe offers Ferrari performance in an opulent 4-seater coupe.
Bad: S63 AMG Coupe Starts at £125,000. S65 AMG Coupe starts at £183,000. Not as 'engaging' to drive as an S500.
Good: Supremely comfortable with an elegant yet modern interior. Handles impressively well for such a big car. Reasonable economy and emissions.
Bad: S300 has a 2.1-litre diesel which can be noisy at times.
Good: Impressively refined with a smooth ride. Metal folding roof means it's as quiet as a coupe. AMG versions are brutally fast.
Bad: Doesn't feel particularly special given the price tag. Comfortable rather than outright sporty. Steering lacks feel.
Good: New name for revamped SLK, decent sized and useable boot for a folding hard top. Mightily impressive claimed 70mpg from SLC 250 d. AMG 43 sounds terrific.
Bad: A revamp rather than a new model. Cabin started to feel dated. Expensive list prices alongside Audi TT.
Good: Improved Sprinter gets sharper look. Engines more economical. Better interior comfort. Quieter on the move than before. Still the best van on the market.
Bad: Not a brand new van more a thorough revamp.
Good: Luxurious and comfortable cabin. Easy and relaxed to drive. Well-equipped as standard. Five star Euro NCAP rating.
Bad: Expensive to buy. Engines gruff when pushed hard. Rearranging the rear seats requires an extra pair of hands.
Good: Excellent quality and great to drive, Car-like refinement and cabin. Crew cab and minibus variants. Good standard equipment levels.
Bad: Foot-operated parking brake is a pain. 1.6-litre engine a little lethargic when laden. No high roof option.
Good: Premium pick-up with car-like refinement and comfort. Quiet engines. 3.5 tonne towing capacity.
Bad: Expensive to buy new and high running costs. Interior quality not quite up to Mercedes-Benz car standards.
Used Cars
Cars not officially imported to the UK
Concept Cars

Ask Honest John

Value my car

Amount to borrow
Sorry. The minimum loan amount is £1000
To pay back over

My credit score

Best available rate 9.20%

Total repayment £9,304.93

Total cost of credit £1,804.93


60 monthly payments

Apply now

Representative example

The Representative APR is 13.2% (fixed) so if you borrow £7,500 over 4 years at a rate of 13.2% p.a (fixed) you will repay £199.21 per month and repay £9562.20 in total.