June 2007

confused-?

I am considering purchasing a new car via the Internet.
It seems a bit of a minefield, and the more I dig, the worse it seems to get.

Can anyone give me feedback on their experiences (good and bad) with companies such as buyacar.co.uk and broker4cars please ?

Thanks for your help! Read more

daveyjp

This thread may get moved as it's motoring related. {Correct - DD}

Start here:

www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?t=52596&...f

thomp1983

as above, sisters 1.9dci rx4 is due it's belt change and she's asked if i want to do it.

first answer was not likely but then thats my answer to everything so probably will look at it. for those that have done one on this engine is it a diyable prospect?, ive done plenty belts on various cars but this would be the first for this engine. will be doing belt, tensioners and waterpump. will proper locking tools be required or will well placed, multiple paint marks suffice? or are substitute relevent locking tools easily made? book time is just over 3 hours so ill allow it a full day which should be plenty id feel, i assume the old method of tensioning the belt to reasonable deflection will be sufficient?

cheers
chris Read more

Collos25

You need the proper locking tool and it needs to be in the air on ramps otherwise you will really struggle.Check you have the correct belt as two different ones depending on engine code.

Mookfish

Ford Escort 1.6 CL 1998

The plug for the lambda sensor came unclipped and melted on the exhaust manifold, unfortunately the plug was too badly melted to figure out which way it goes together so I don't know where the wires go.

The new sensor has 2 white 1 black and 1 gray wire, same as the old one, but the cars wiring loom is

white
brown
black/yellow
purple/yellow

Does anyone know what connects to where?

Thanks in advance. Read more

Mookfish

Thanks for that, all done now. Important part of fitting was to remove the horrible crimp connectors and get the soldering iron, I had zero confidence in those and didn't want the lambda to come disconnected and need replacing again.

oilfilter

As a constant user of this exellent site I took the liberty to create an RSS feed for the technical and discussion backroom forum. You can add it to your chosen news aggregator (Sage, Great news, Live bookmarks etc').

Discussion forum:

www.feedfire.com/site/rss.cgi?ChanContentId=021500


Technical matters:

www.feedfire.com/site/rss.cgi?ChanContentId=021499 Read more

Mad Maxy

If there was a 'confused' and/or 'couldn't give a monkey's' smilie/symbol I'd be using it.

MichaelR

Hi guys..

Wonder what your take on this would be and what the next step should be?

Some background.

In February, the radiator in my car went. I took it to a local radiator specialist to ask if it could be repaired, or whether I'd need a new one. The guy took one look at the radiator and said it was leaking from the plastic end tanks and could not be repaired, and would require replacement.

The local BMW specialist could not fit me in for several days, but the radiator specialist offered to do the work for me there and then, replacing the radiator. I was happy to accept.

I collected the car, drove away, job done.

But no. A week later, I checked the coolant level on the car. Empty. Coolant all over the engine undertray. Took the tray off, radiator leaking from the bottom corners. Took it straight back. He took the car for the day - I paid for insurance on another car - and I picked it up that afternoon. He said it was all fixed, the new radiator had developed a tiny hole and he had now replaced it for me. He apologised for the problems.

I drove away again. Over the next few weeks, I found myself topping up with coolant every couple of days. Surely not right. I took the plastic engine undertray off (Which was again flooded with coolant), and low and behold, coolant was dripping off the ends of the radiator. I went back again. He was apologetic, and offered again to have a look. I picked the car up again, just as they were finishing the work. A member of his staff had broken the plastic fan cowling with removing the radiator and replacing it so many times. But the guy seemed so friendly, I didn't say much of it.

He claimed it was totally fixed - same problem again, apparently. Brilliant. He said 'well there was pressure in the engine that was blowing up the radiators'. This seemed strange, as the M54B30 engine operates a pressurised cooling system anyway, with a vent system which vents excess pressure over 2 bar.

You can guess what happened next. Leaking, again.

Sick of the problems, I took the car to my local BMW specialist. They called up with a diagnosis.

The car required a new radiator, as it was leaking from the end tanks. I explained the situation and said I'd previously had 3 radiators fitted to cure this problem. What the guy said next shocked me.

I was told the radiator in my car was not new. It was at least 2 years old - infact, it had a build date of 2005 stamped on it. It was also a genuine BMW part. The guy suggested that, perhaps, it was the radiator in the car from before, or a used one from somewhere. He also said it looked like it had been recored at some point. I authorised replacement of the radiator. Whilst they were doing that, I also had them replace the thermostat as well as they said it was prudent to do it and they were having a few problems bleeding the system.

They did this work about 3-4k miles ago. Since then, the car has been absolutely perfect. No issues, no strange holes appearing, no leaking from the end tank. Just a simple, straightforward, radiator replacement.

They gave me the radiator they took out the car. It doesnt look new, it looks a bit old. It also appears to have been bashed lots at the end, perhaps in an attempt to reseal the radiator with the plastic end tanks, I dont know. It's clearly new a nearly new radiator from the likes of GSF or any of the other pattern part suppliers.

So I went back to the original place to request a refund. He refused, saying that my car had 'blown up his radiators'. I then pointed out that the car was now perfectly functioning with no issues at all. I showed him the invoice from the other garage detailing that they had removed what appeared to be a used radiator. He spotted the Thermostat replacement and then said 'Thats the problem, it was the Thermostat all along, blowing the radiators'. He refused to pay. He refused to address my point that despite 3 attempts at repairing the car, he had failed.

So, yesterday I sent a recorded delivery letter, outlining the situation, requesting a refund of the radiator, labour, 2 days insurance on the alternative car, and the cost of replacing the fan cowling. Basically, the costs I had incurred as a result of his faliure to do the work and not a penny more.

He refused to fund anything but the cost of the radiator part and the cost of a new fan cowling. He refused to refund any labour costs. He would only make any refund if we gave him the old radiator back. He stuck to his story that my thermostat blew up his radiators. I'd have been happy to hand over the old radiator had he refunded my money, and paid for the fan cowling replacement in full, but as he would only refund the parts costs, we parted company.

To this day he denies the fact he put a used radiator in the car. I suspect, but of course never actually said this to him as I didnt want to degenerate into an arguement, that the radiator I have is the cars original radiator, which he has at every occasion attempted to repair. I can, however, NOT prove this.

What do I do now? I suspect my next stop is small claims. Do I have a case? Surely there is no way a thermostat can blow radiators within a mile? (Second leak was visible less than a mile after I arrived home from picking the car up). Is he trying it on?

What is the Small Claims Court like in cases like this, where he is citing technical issues as a reason for no refund? Read more

tintin01

Sorry - accidentally put How to Complain in twice. Law on Supply of Goods and Services summary:

www.dti.gov.uk/files/file25486.pdf

The actual law about goods and services:

www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2002/20023045.htm

zarqon

Hi

I recently bought a 1997 legacy estate 2.0 petrol.
It's done 116000 mile and is generally very good - it's only used for the dogs.

The problem is it always starts from cold, but sometimes refuses to start when warm.

I've had it serviced and my local garage recommended removing the old immobiliser but it still occasionally refuses to go, leaving me stuck with hot thirsty dogs 3 or 4 miles from home.

If I sit it out it will start after about 40 minutes.

Any ideas?
Read more

zarqon

Thanks Aprilla

I'll let my garage bloke know what you suspect is the issue.

As for the recommendation to walk from the from door - I do this most days but like to take them into the country regularly and let them run, walking the streets on a lead is not much fun - there are several country parks around here that are ideal. And I use the legagcy when we all need to go out and take the dogs with us - but yes I know it's not very green to dirve to go for a walk.

MPZ

Mazda-Man

Anyone know where the regn. prefixes EF & EA hail from?

Cheers! Read more

Muggy

And the Isle of Wight lost the distinctive DL sequence, I think they use HW now?

Surely they could have kept DL in this instance even if it meant breaking a sequence elsewhere?

I also find it extremely difficult to remember the new registrations compared to the older ones, I'm not sure why. And the current system certainly isn't the one I would have chosen if I was in charge of it at the review a few years ago. My system would have been as follows:

ABC 1234 xx

Where ABC would be the traditional letter codes for each area.

1234 would be a month / year code, eg 0607 for a car registered this month.

xx represents AA through to ZZ for individual identifiers, giving a maximum of 17576 per area per month [ less any letters omitted, for example if they omit Q it would still give a maximum of 15,625 possible registrations per area per month ]. So let's take the IoW as an example, the first car registered in June 2007 on the IoW would be ADL 0607 AA, the next one would be ADL 0607 AB and so on; after ADL 0607 ZZ the next one would be BDL 0607 AA and so on.

To avoid too many similar registrations each sequence could "wrap round", thus if ADL 0607 GK was the last car sold in June, the first one in July would be ADL 0707 GL and so on.


The two drawbacks with this, which I guess is why they didn't do something like this, are a) they would have to change their computer software to cope with the extra digit and b) the DVLA would not be able to create and sell combinations that spell out words.

I suspect b) would have been the deciding factor!

Discuss???

Round The Bend

Well what at they for? I thought it was illegal to use them on the move but I?ve been travelling up and down motorways in poor road conditions (spray, dim light etc) for the past week and I reckon some 10% of cars have been relying upon their sideies only. It leaves them virtually invisible at a time when visibility is vital.

Is it possible that they don?t realise that they have n?t got their headlights on??
Read more

Round The Bend

Back to my OP. Appalling conditions this morning on the M5 and still some cars driving on sidelights. Like oilrag above, I can't believe that there people are deliberately selecting their sidelights in these conditions, which means that they are doing so in error.

This is a real safety issue which can't be solved by traffic cameras. Irrespective of the EU stuff, surely there is an argument that there should either be a separate switch for the sidelights only option - well away from the proper headlamp switch - or some sort of warning should be installed. Would it be possible to default sidelights to dipped if the engine is running?

CJay{P}

Could someone please guide me as to how to bleed the brake fluid from my car. Are there any special tools that I need?

Never bleeded a system before, but I am ok with spanners.

Thanks in advance. Read more

Lud

Does the Mityvac suck the fluid out through the bleed nipples on the wheels in the usual order, Aprilia, while one makes sure the reservoir stays topped up?

OldHand

Was just researching a car I was thinking of buying for my Father and noticed a small error in the BHP output of the Mercedes CLKW208

Here's a section

" or 242bhp 5.4 litre AMG 55 V8."

As far as I'm aware the AMG55 has a higher output than this- some 350bhp. I wasn't quite sure how to flag this up so I've put it here.

I think changing it would be a good idea as it almost put me off buying one-44bhp per litre!!! Such waste would be profligate.

If anyone has any experience of this pimp-mobile or feels that my father doesn't fit it's likely crack dealer demographic then let me know!

Fuel economy isn't an issue- he's loaded. Read more

Roger Jones

Ah yes, I should have checked chassis codes:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_C208

Here:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_W208

it says 347bhp for the CLK 55 AMG, and 510Nm torque -- more than enough.