October 2008
Will give a background in case that helps of other problems that may be related.
Previously the car would occasionally lose power when low on fuel (below 1/4 tank near the low fuel light) you would notice it when revving just above 4k or when you went round a corner fast she would cut out.
The other day on about 1/2 a tank it felt like it was stuttering/hunting a little when you tried to put your foot down but only slight. Was on way to get shopping, when I got near the store it was starting to get worse... but thought ah well.. did shopping got back to the car and she wouldn't start.
Green flag came out, took off the pipe going to the air filter housing and sprayed something into the air filter housing and also in the other end through MAF towards throttle body. It started again and ticked over ok and I manged to get her home but still very rough no EMLs or anything tho. Dude reckoned it was the MAF and suggested I clean it...
Cleaned MAF.. no difference.. car will start.. sometimes will tick over ok but as soon as you put it in gear and give it ANY juice at all even the slightest it will just hunt and cut out. If you are very very gentle with the throttle it will sometimes move.
Changed MAF for known good MAF off my dad's 1.8... still the same so I suppose that rules out MAF.
Now car doesn't want to start at all
Not really sure where do go yet... the green flag guy said he didn't think it was the fuel pump as he reckoned it would either work or not and wouldn't even tick over if the pump was gone?
Can anyone give me any ideas?? I'm quite stuck now and can't even get it to a garage.
Other possibles I've been thinking of myself are ignition coil/catalyst collapsed/fuel pump.
If it is the fuel pump (which seems like worst case senario) does anyone know how to change it? Read more
I have recently changed the engine in my car and it is a passat motor that i have used,my query is do I need the injector pump reprogramming or should I use my original pump from the A4,Thanks Tom. Read more
people say it needs programing,and people saying it doesnt ,ive had advise from you before and its been spot on.audi want £170 to do this ,do you think it could be done with vag com?thanks again screwloose!!
Been around a few garages with a view to buying a Focus (still looking). I'm a serious buyer with cash plus p/x in my pocket. There are a lot of Focus/s/i about, but many are strongly priced with no hint that there is a cash crisis.
Shown dealers the colour of my money, but am getting truly silly offers on the Getz. An 05 getz ,with FSH and in good nick. Offered £1700 today. What a laugh. They may just ask me to give it them for free. I don't want silly money on it, just a fair price to change. I don't know how desperate they think I am..but they're in for a shock.
The Getz is a very reliable and keeping it won't be a hardship. I would imagine that the dealers are actually more desperate than I'll ever be. Read more
Want the focus because of the extra luggage room and to silence a grumbling 9 year old complaining about his legs.
Tailgating.
At some point during early every journey I glance in the rear view mirror and find it filled with some goon who seems intent on parking in my boot.
Tailgating is ignorant, inconsiderate, dangerous, annoying and just plain damn stupid.
Now, I fully concede to making the odd mistake myself.
Sometimes forget to indicate, lane discipline can be a bit sloppy, pull into a junction before rather than after the driver already there, that sort of thing.
But tailgating? Never.
So the most annoying thing on the roads for me is tailgating.
What is it for you? Read more
Drivers who speed up just as I go to overtake (Im on cruise control) on the motorway,then slow down again when I pull in behind them.
Idiots like the one on the M74 last Friday, two lanes that merge into one at road works he sits in both lanes preventing others passing so effectively causing a 4 mile jamb behind. Once passed the road works drives at 40 MPH. Thinks that he has the right to enforce some kind of traffic control.
Cyclist with no lights and think traffic lights are not to be obeyed.
Lorries that site behind each other for miles then site side by side on the next strech of dual carriage way,A9 typical example.
the list is not exhaustable
i have got a peugeot 206 cc and the clutch bites right at the very top!! the pedal is nearly fully up before you feel the bite! i was just wondering if this was normal for whats classed as a sports car, because none of my other standard cars have bitten so far up, and i am unsure if its right.
any advice on whether it is right, or if it can be adjusted (i have been informed that it is a hydrollic clutch) or even if it needs replacing, any response would be appriciated.
thanks in advance,
a confused cc owner Read more
its got 51 thousand on the clock, we have just bought it second hand, from the owner who has had it from new.
we were lead to believe that these types of cars did have "high clutches" but speaking to people now we are unsure,
any advice would be welcome
thanks
"More than 60 cars were seized during a police operation to target travelling criminals in East Yorkshire.
It comes a week after a similar operation around York, the biggest the city has seen, which led to 278 cars being taken off the roads."
Full story here:
tinyurl.com/3shcho
Read more
Must be like the retreat from Moscow on those blizzard driven slip roads around Liverpool then ? :-)
I see on today's news that Ford and GM are having major problems in the US due to very poor sales. Ford shares are down to '1950's levels' apparently and the US government is offering them £14bn of loan guarantees to help them stay afloat! Read more
Bloomberg might disagree about Ghosn's prowess; he's made Renault into a joke....
www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601090&sid=ageZX...e
Looking at the car by car breakdown, there is the following for my Accord:
"Reports of problems with swirl chambers of 2.2iCDTIs at high mileage. Best to have replaced before the 3 year 90k mile end of warranty."
How exactly should I go about getting this done? I've never had much luck with getting things that are actually broken fixed. Surely the dealer will just tell me to get lost if I start asking for something that isn't broken to be replaced?
Any thoughts? Read more
I've just re-read that, and it sounds like I'm whinging.
Not only am I not convinced that's how you spell it, that wasn't my intention. I was trying to ask whether anyone had tried to get a pre-emptive warranty replacement done? In particular, what proof of the problem existing would I need? I don't think "it says so on the internet" is very convincing.
So yeah the other night I used the M25 for only the second time and??roadworks.
I didn?t get flashed, im assuming I?d have seen it as im told its very bright right?
Camera wise all that?s bothering me is those average speed ones.
A couple of times I had issues with speed limits. I try not to go over any speed limit at all. I like REALLY try. But its unhelpful when you just aren?t sure whats right. I went through areas flashing 40mph, 50mph, and 60mph. any time I go those speeds people get very annoyed.
At one point im sat there and my sat nav is telling me 70mph, as well as flashing to alert for speed cameras wanting me to do 50mph, with road signs telling me 60mph. Not really a great help. I cant remember what speed I went through places at ? but never above 70, and other people were passing me all the time (unless it was single land traffic in which case tough ? they had to wait). So im figuring, why am I worried when people were passing me?
The cameras I mean are in Kent, I travelled from Dartford to Woking, so that stretch of road was the issue for me.
I didn?t blast my way through roadwork areas, there were scores of cars going faster than me, I didn?t see any flashes, do you think I should be concerned, in particular about the bit where I wasn?t sure of the speed limit which was going on? Are they the Gatso flashing ones there or another kind?
Read more
Here is a link to a picture of a SPECS camera gantry.
tinyurl.com/3jybbo
Note the large 'L' shaped gantry and the strange logo in the right angle between the vertical pole and horizontal beam - it looks a bit like a Motorola logo. The cameras are also distictinctive. Just search Google images for "Specs Cameras and you will get loads of piccys, They aren't easy to see at night and they work 24/7 without flashing - infra red is used.
Apologies ? a long one?.I have just renewed the insurance on one of my cars, the one where our au pair is the main driver but I am the owner and policy holder.
We had a claim earlier this year - a burst tyre which resulted in £1200 of bodywork damage. The au pair was driving at the time.
I also picked up 3 points last November for parking opp a solid white line (TS20 DVLA code)
Now, ploughing through three or four comparison sites to get quotes I have mistakenly indicated a different DVLA offence code (MS10, parking in a dangerous position) because I was doing it without my licence to hand to check the code and I genuinely didn't spot the TS20 in the drop- down list so made a guess that MS10 must have been the right one.
Also although I told the insurer that our au pair was driving when the claim occurred, when I got the policy doc through yesterday it showed two claims in March this year, one with the au pair driving and one with a slightly different date with me driving.
I called the insurer as soon as they opened yesterday to clear up these errors. This is the result of me calling the insurer to check a quote over the phone and according to their records i told them during that call that I had made the claim (probably because I didn't understand at that point that is it is the driver rather than the owner and policyhold who makes the claim, which seems quite a logical thing to assume but obviously not...)
After several long calls they came back and said that the renewal would actually be £1800 not £800, principally because they believe that an au pair driving is business use as they consider him to be an employee of ours. I explained that they had been insuring us for the last year on social domestic and commuting (as I have done for the two years previous with other insurers whilst we have had an au pair) even though the policy docs clearly states the main driver is an au pair with no access to other cars and they said that this was a mistake and the policy would have been void in a claim.
During the course of the call I said that other insurers accept au pairs as if they are members of the family and that I felt their view of au pairs as employees was wrong and therefore the price was incorrect and that I would seek alternative prices. The insurer said I had two weeks period of grace during which the policy can be cancelled.
Feeling that I was getting the ?talk to the hand? treatment and having had my confidence in them knocked by the confusion that I had actually had invalid insurance I took out a policy via major high st broker for £1300 effective from 00.01 this morning.
I called the first insurer back yesterday to tell them to cancel but the department had closed at 5pm and the call centre could only pass on a message.
They called me this morning and said I can either accept their £1800 premium or void the insurance but this would mean that on renewal I would have to state that I had had insurance declined.
I think that this is an outrageous way to deal with a policy which had genuine errors from both sides which I sought to correct at the earliest possible opportunity when they became clear. I ended up speaking to someone in underwriting who simply repeated ?you have a choice between taking the policy and voiding it? and would not listen to my argument that this was not actually choice since the first was based on an erroneous belief that au pairs are employees which drove the premium to an unrealistic rate or the second where I get the money back but will face hideous problems on renewal of trying to insure a young driver with a record of insurance refused.
I have spoken to the insurer?s customer complaints department who tell me that they have voided the original policy and they are investigating. I have asked them to make it clear to me that they have taken this decision of their own volition.
I need some advice please on how to argue with a ?computer says no? insurer that is behaving in a more than inflexible way.
Read more
I think you're right, but you'd think there would be a definitive answer.
The big problem I had with this insurer was that they insured our au pair (who is staying with us for another year) as main driver last year and had him listed as an au pair on the policy on social domestic and commuting use and even paid a claim where he was the driver but then on renewal turned round and said that he was an employee and must have business use. This added £1000 to their quote!
This is the fifth year that we have insured this car for an au pair as main driver and have had not had these problems before although once I did have to have a conversation with the insurer at the time who agreed that an au pair isn't an employee.
The policy we now have is with Zurich who are perfectly happy to have the au pair as main driver (verified by the broker before the policy began) on social and domestic use.


But not if it's a diesel!!!!