July 2005

oldpostie

Got to work at usual early start yesterday, i.e. still dark. When I went to park up and go in couldn't lock the car, although I had just emptied my things out of the boot. Next thing, couldn't undo boot, lock rear doors. Remote key not working, which I thought was the battery. Found I had no indicators, or rear wipers. Everything else was OK.
Assumed it was simply a fuse, so called in the Ford dealers to ask which it could be, and saw how many there are. I examined all the likely culprits but everything looked OK. The workshop was full, and wouldn't take the car in to look at it, but one of the partners had a look, but couldn't see anything broken.
The car is left with them now, and I am driving a Ka, which is a great little car, if a bit small.
Have to wait to hear from them whenever they can look at it.
Surely it can only be a fuse, but what caused one to blow, if that's what it is ? Read more

oldpostie

It's a 53 reg 2003 TDC130 (2.0) hatch.
I signed a paper to do with the warranty claim and there was a figure of some £92 shown.

heraultcatman

I have continuing problems with the suspension in my P-reg Activa. It has been back to the workshop (local main agency) several times, all the spheres have been replaced and the system thoroughly flushed through, but the ride is still very hard, the car is sometimes lopsided, and sometimes is very sluggish in getting its back end up. The garage says it has tried all it knows, and can't trace the source of the problem. I want to use the car for a lengthy holiday trip quite soon, so suggestions as to what else to explore would be very welcome! Read more

RichardW

Activas are a law unto themselves - even when they are working! I would defo recommend a thread on Andyspares - there's a lad there who is quite into the system and might be able to help (certainly the lopsided bit, which I think is a known issue). There are also a couple of guys working through problems with hydractive suspension not getting into soft mode that will be of relevance, since the hard/soft bit is (probably!) nothing to do with the Activa bit, but restricted to the hydractive part of the suspension.
--
RichardW

Is it illogical? It must be Citroen....

adverse camber

Interesting article in this mornings new scientist. An interview with the swedish director of traffic safety.

road deaths in europe are the equiv of a jumbo jet crashing every three days.

putting a little wire barrier in road centres reduced frontal accidents by 95% (does it also stop overtaking?)

ESC is twice as effective at saving lives than airbags. It is thought to half the number of single vehicle fatal accidents. Presumably also drastically reduces accidents.

All swedish vehicles will have alclocks by 2012, which prevent the car being driven if the driver has been drinking.

They are testing gps based speed limiters (and the uk DOT are said to be very interested)

The Director has (before taking this job) been banned twice for speeding.



I know we have several backroomers who spend time in Sweden, whats with the wire barriers ?

Mark Read more

madf

Statistics like th above are misleading.

ESP is an additional expense for many cars so one "could" assume the buyer was more safety conscious and therefore more likely to drive more carefully and hence have fewer accidents...



madf


tomG

I'm in the market for a car around the 6-8k mark.. Want decent size and high performance. Was looking at impreza turbos but for that money the mileage is too high or they're too old..Insurace group not so much of a big deal as I'm on fleet cover.

Does anyone have any thoughts? Saw the previous thread and there was a lot of mentions of the Focus but I'm not mad keen on how they look.

Any help would be great - thanks.

Tom Read more

v8man

Forget cars, get a Kawasaki ZX12r. 200 mph in derestricted form! Not practical for a family I know, but will annihilate anything on the road.
--
\"Nothing less than 8 cylinders will do\"

Hawesy1982

In the pub last night a mate of mine was telling me his plans for increasing the power on his car.

It's a 51 plate Peugeot 307 XSi (2.0 138bhp)

After his sandard exhaust fell off, he replaced it with a 'performance' one which he was told should give him about an extra 8bhp. The company he bought it from then suggested that he could get a K&N filter and induction kit, an air intake which actually cools the air as it passes through, and a re-map/chip with the following benefits.

Filter and Induction kit: +12bhp
Air Intake Thingy: +10bhp
Remap/Chip: +30bhp

This would in theory give him a total of almost 200bhp from a normally aspirated 2.0 engine. They don't provide telemetry to back up the power increases however, so the only way to tell what diffence these mods would make would be driving feel.

I was pretty doubtful that these performance boosts could be acheived on a non-turbo car, but he swore blind that this was what they claimed. Are they taking the Michael? Read more

Round The Bend

Pah! If I had all the promised performance benefits from all the golf products I'd bought over the years I'd be hitting the ball further than Tiger Woods.

Forum An idea
Xileno {P}

Following on from the 10K in an 'ugly duckling' and the Citroen C3 opinion threads, why don't we have a separate section purely for owners to write about their experiences with their cars, whether good or bad. I know this can already be done in 'Discussion' but I think a separate thread would focus it a bit more, rather like the 'I have a Question', we could have an on-going thread called 'My Car' or something. When 100 entries are made, the thread is archived and we start again. This sort of information is valuable for others to look at when considering a new car. The thread could be strutured so that you answer certain questions such as why you bought it, what you like most about it, what you dislike, would you buy it again etc. Then everyone can follow the same format. It would also be easy to research a make and model since you could search on 'My Car' and 'Citroen' for example.

Thoughts? Read more

Hawesy1982

Expanding on that, how about an "Owner reviews" section in the CBCB, like a number of other car sites have?

Roly93

The new VW Passat has been round a couple of months now and I was wondering if anyone had any impressions of the car generally. I am looking to change my car soon, and I was wondering whether to stick with the Audi A4 or whether to go for the new Passat which is cheaper.

I know the new Passat now has a transverse engine and is based upon the Golf floorpan which is a bit offputting, whereas Audi have gone their separate way sticking with the longitudinal engine/gearbox layout. Basically, is the the New Passat going to be as solid and durable as the old one ? Read more

Halmer

Mr J Clarkson doesn't think much of the latest (or the previous) VW Passat (yesterday's Sunday Times). Then again, I don't think much of him.

fjz

Hi ive seen a passat that im intrested in buying its a 2001/y reg 1.8t sport reg and done 91k vw/fsh im slightly worried as the lambda light is always on. the owner said it normall and it wont go out. Ive also heard a lot of bad things about passats is there anyone out there that can advice me what would you do. the condition of the car look great im also worried about how much it cost to do repairs. any info would be a real help


thanks Read more

DavidHM

Compared to a diesel, no argument - the VW units are exceptionally economical in the real world, and on paper. The Ford tdci units are good, but not that good for economy.

The Passat in question is a 1.8 turbo petrol though - perhaps not comparing like with like but worth bearing in mind if you're considering paying a VW premium for a used car that you could pay the diesel premium instead and get better economy, or get a cheaper petrol one.

Big Vern

I stumbed across the following data from Admiral at www.admiral.com/pressOffice/pressReleases/250105.p...l and found it very interesting:


The best and worst places for motorists in 2004 revealed
Motorists in the Harrow area of London had the worst driving record of anywhere in the country last year, according to research by a leading insurer.

Financial intermediary Admiral has looked at the claims frequency of one million motorists across the UK in 2004 and produced a list of the ten best and ten worst places in the country. Motorists in the Harrow postcode area are top of the list, 9.6% of motorists living there had an accident that was their fault.

The list of the worst places for accidents in 2004 is, not surprisingly, dominated by places in and around London. Second in the list is Uxbridge with 9.2% of motorists there having a fault accident and third is north west London, with 9.0%.

People who want to avoid having an accident should consider moving to Scotland, as towns north of the border dominate the list of places with the lowest percentage of accidents. The Galashiels area is top of the list of areas with the lowest frequency of accidents. Just 3.9% of motorists there had an accident last year that was their fault.

Northern Ireland's motorists came second with 4.1% of those living in the Belfast postcode area causing an accident and third was Lancaster with 4.5%. Other Scottish districts in the list of best areas are Dumfries, Perth, Inverness and Aberdeen.

Admiral managing director, Jane Stone, said: "Our figures show the percentage of drivers within each postcode area of the UK who had an accident that was their fault last year. The difference between the best and worst area is quite astonishing. Motorists in Harrow were almost two and a half times more likely to have caused an accident than those in Galashiels. Our research goes some way to explaining why where you live has such an affect on insurance premiums."

The tables below show the ten best and worst postcode areas for fault accidents in 2004. The UK average rate is 6.5% of motorists having a fault accident.

Best Areas

Position Postcode Area %age of motorists with accident 2004
1st TD Galashiels and Scottish borders 3.9%
2nd BT Belfast and Northern Ireland 4.1%
3rd LA Lancaster 4.5%
4th FY Blackpool 4.7%
5th DG Dumfries and Galloway 4.8%
6th PH Perth 4.9%
7th WR Worcester 5.0%
8th IV Inverness and eastern Highlands 5.0%
9th AB Aberdeen 5.2%
10th LN Lincoln 5.2%


Worst Areas

Position Postcode Area %age of motorists with accident 2004
1st HA Harrow 9.6%
2nd UB Uxbridge 9.2%
3rd NW North west London 9.0%
4th CR Croydon 8.8%
5th SM Sutton 8.6%
6th N North London 8.5%
7th IG Ilford 8.4%
8th EN Enfield 8.4%
9th TW Twickenham 8.3%
10th AL St Albans 8.1%


Jane Stone, commented: "Although you would expect motorists in London to have the most accidents, it is interesting that those living in the outlying parts of the city, such as Croydon, Ilford and Twickenham had the worst driving record last year. Maybe those in the centre of the city drive less, or are just more careful."

Issue date: 25-01-05
Read more

Obsolete

In central London speeds are too low for accidents. In outer London speeds are higher, and traffic density is fairly high leading to more accidents. In rural areas traffic density is low, and thus less likelihood of accidents, and less likelihood of getting wound up and angry. I might be wrong, but arguments along these lines must be a factor.

Leif

doctorchris

New Panda 4x4 has been making a strange rubbing noise when pulling away in 1st gear.
Ooo 'eck, I thought.
Had a look under the front wheel arches and found a bar-coded plastic tag hanging off each spring, must have been rubbing on the tyres, so I removed them (plastic tags, not the tyres).
Phew! Read more

No Do$h

Soo much for the PDI. Speaks volumes about the dealership if they didn't pick this up on the test-drive prior to handover.