November 2005

horatio

**WARNING**
IMHO it is imperative that you keep an eye on your NCB and demand a letter stating exactly what your record is. Don't let them waffle their way out of giving it to you.


I have 11 years no claims. This is constantly giving me a headache at renewal/change of insurer.

I was with Tesco, and when I went to them in 2002 I gave them a letter saying I had 8 years. Before I took out the policy I asked CS (customer service) when it came to renewal would they supply me with a letter stating I had 9 years, she said 'yes'.

Ok so I took the policy and stayed with them for 3 years. The in between years I was never given anything saying more than 6 years, no problem because I wasn't changing insurer. Until now, I have have changed insurer this year to Nationwide. Whilst Nationwide only goes up to 5 years or more, there are companies out there who accept more than 5 years. and if I accept a letter from Tesco now which is innaccurate then I will have lost my true record.

I asked Tesco CS last week to send me a letter saying 11 years, and the guy I spoke to agreed it was 11 years and I would recieve such in a letter. Today the letter arrived saying 6 years. And so starts the merry-go-round.

I phone up Tesco and the usual arguements come back at me.
"we only go up to 5 years or more"
"no other company goes over 5 years"
"no other company goes over 65%"

Ergo it is irrelevant what you are asking for and we only issue letters saying "5 years" (even though mine said "6 years")

My responses to them:
"It is irrelevant what *you* go up to, other companies go over 5 years and I need to keep an accurate record, When I arrived here in 2002 I supplied a letter saying 8 years."

"Many companies do go over 5 years, Frizzell and Esure are two but there must be more."

"Many companies do go over 65%, Frizzell, Esure, Norwich Union are just 3 to name a few."

The merry-go-round continues until they finally conceded to send me a letter saying 11 years. Took at least 15 mins on the phone...luckily I had phoned via their head office freephone 0800 number and asked to be "put through"....see this website..."saynoto0870.com".

Frizzell goes up to 9 years and offer up to 68% or 70% for those with 9 years.

Esure goes upto 20years iirc and offers upto 75% for those people - though I have not confirmed exactly who gets the 75% and what is the meaning of them asking about ncb upto 20 years. It may just be that although Esure is not competitive to me at the moment with 11 years, in 5 years time when I have 16 years, they may be the cheapest. I have to be able to prove my 16 years at that time.

I hope you all keep your records accurate. If these companies are going to offer more than 65% for more than 5 years then *all* the companies should be aware of this and supply the accurate details upon renewal. Read more

Alan

I am very pleased that Norwich union seems to have increased their no NCD. When I was with them a it only went up to 4 years so a VERY minor claim on from another party, (there was no damage to our car) put my NCD from 25 years down to TWO.
I haven't been with them since.

gollygosh

Driving home from work on Saturday morning, the amber "check engine indication lamp" came on and the engine power dropped sharply. I stopped the car and checked the owner manual which says this light comes on when there is a problem in the emission control system. I started the engine again and the light went out and drove home without any problems at all. I don't know whether I should take the car down to my local dealership, or if the light doesn't come on again, the problem was maybe a one off. Any advice appreciated. Read more

gollygosh

Hello Pete, thanks for the reply. The car is a year 2000 2.0 GLS. I phoned my local Mitsubishi dealership who told me that if it happens again to bring it in and they will do a diagnostic check, but if it doesn't happen again it is ok to carry on driving it. He said it could be the oxygen sensor and warned me they aren't cheap. I have just had the 54k mile service done (not by Mitsubishi) and I was wondering if this could have had anything to do with it. I've been driving it since it happened last Sat without any problems. I will keep you updated if it happens again, or if I get the check done. Thanks for the link, I found it very interesting.
Andy.

Babygotoo

I've noticed a weeping from the seam just under and around the area where the fuel filter is. I'll have a go with some sort of patch system, any products that you recommend would be warmly accepted, however, should the tank have to be replaced does anyone with any experience have any nuggets of info that would help me along. I've spoken to my local garage who didn't want to give even a rough price due to "rusty bolts, cracking pipes etc etc".

regards

Ellis Read more

Dynamic Dave

On another forum I frequent, someone recently got a brand new Cavalier tank from www.fueltanksdirect.co.uk for £63.10 including next day delivery. Just took a browse on the fuel tank site, and that offer still stands.

satflyer


Hello,

I have recently purchased a Escort (N-Reg Feb96) and have a few questions.

1) Which MK is the car? Some people told me MK5, others told me MK6?

2) Where can I get a user manual for the car? I am looking for the same manual that came with the car not a workshop manual (HAYNES). I have tried a FORD main dealer and was told they are not available anymore.

3) Also looking for a parcel shelf.. Anyone has any contacts or where I can get one from?

Many Thanks,
Read more

sierraman

Quite a few lovely Mk1s and 2s at the classic car show yesterday,from standard to Colin Mcrae's Mk2 beast.No Mk3s though....

daveyjp

At 5pm On Saturday I had to travel from Headingley in North Leeds to the M621 in south Leeds - 5 miles. This journey took an hour, the inner ring road and surrounding roads in Leeds were gridlocked. I thought the reason was beacuse Leeds United were at home and the ground is next to the M621. This was partly to blame, but two other issues were causing problems.

The inner ringroad on the carriageway in to the City is being worked on and the outside lane of three is sometimes coned off. On Saturday all three lanes were open and the lane closed signs were flipped over - fine if you are heading in to the City, but heading out the signs could be seen through the frame and it appeared the outside lane of our carriageway was closed! This is near a major roundabout so drivers thought a lane on the roundabout was closed and were moving lanes!

Secondly the newly installed lights for our exit on the roundabout near Elland Road were on sequence of green for 15 seconds, red for 1 minute 45 seconds - I presume to get traffic away from the ground. The irony was there was barely any traffic leaving Elland Road and for most of the time our lights were on red and no traffic could be seen.

Leeds have just failed in a bid for a tram system and gridlock is envisaged. Maybe the traffic engineers could look at sources of gridlock other than volume of traffic. The problems on Saturday were both their own making. A simple rephasing of lights could have solved this - surely intelligent lights have been invented which monitor the traffic speeds and sequence the lights accordingly.



Read more

David Horn

I'm quite pleased the tram scheme got rejected. You could buy a lot of buses for 500 million quid.

$till $kint

A comment made in the Road Safety thread reminded me of something I've been meaning to explore since little mi$$ was born some 6 years ago.

What do you do if you want to take a taxi and have a small child with you? Ignoring the logistical nightmare of carrying your own seat with you wherever you go, are any of you aware of cabbies that routinely carry a child seat in the boot for passengers with a small child?
$$ Read more

horatio

An excellent bit of research still skint, thanks for that, now we all know where we stand. And we know that passengers under 3 do not require a seat belt where there is no special child restraint available.

Which is why I when I *was* a taxi driver would always drive extra carefully when I had very small children onboard because they were invariably unrestrained. Had they been restrained though it would make no difference I still would drive that much more cautiously. And like I said earlier I never allowed young (under 10 - 11) into the front seat.

It is good to see the rules will not apply to taxis because it would not have been practical.

romeo156

Hope someone can help

My wifes aging fiesta is suffering from all sorts of problems, however, this morning, driving along there seemed to be a lack of battery power (although the car started first time). At one point, the radio turned off, the blower worked at half speed and the internal and external lights were all very dim. After about 90 seconds, it reverted back to normal.

We also get a screeching noise (alternator?)

Anyone any ideas?

Thanks
Read more

Altea Ego

Clean up and tighten all the battery terminals and connections

top turkey

My family and I were waiting for a bus to take us home on Friday night from a council organised bonfire. As we were waiting, I saw a family of at least 3 adults and 3 children get into a modified H reg XR3i. The children were all sitting on adults laps in the back and were clearly not secured.

As the car was waiting to pull out, the driver started to talk to at least 2 local policemen who were walking around the area. To my amazement, they said nothing to the driver about the number of passengers or their lack of suitable restraint, despite the conversation going on for at least 10 minutes. I was only about 8 foot away. The police even moved the bus queue to help the car get out!

This seems an amazing paradox that many of us will get a fine and points for'unsafe' driving as determined by a safety camera, but a clear case of unsafe practice where the lives of inncocent children are at stake is literally ignored.

Could there be any reasonable explanation as to why at least two police officers thought such a practice was safe?

One couldn't make it up....

TT

--
Top Turkey - the fastest hands in Brum Read more

Pete M

Just to add to my post above, the coroner commenting on the case made some interesting remarks. The link to the full Herald story is:
tinyurl.com/aat4k

PM

henry k

I noticed that there is a 4mm tread depth minimum as stated below.
Seem logical to me but I was unaware of this to date.

www.bridgestone.co.uk/
When is a tyre considered to be worn out?

In Europe, the legal requirement is that the tread grooves retain a certain minimum depth, when measured at any Tread Wear Indicator (TWI), located around the circumference of the tyre. For summer tyres, the figure is 1.6 mm, while for winter models it is 4 mm.

It may nevertheless be advisable to change a tyre at an earlier stage if there is a discernible loss of grip or deterioration in handling performance ? or if you are driving regularly at high speeds, under extreme weather conditions or over hazardous terrain.

Read more

Ruperts Trooper

The legal minimum tread depth is 1.6mm.

There is a recommended minimum (different to a legal minimum) of 3mm for "summer" tyres, ie common UK fitment.

It would seem entirely reasonable to me that "winter" tyres should have more tread depth than "summer" tyres.

It's generally down to the individual to determine when tyres are "worn out". In days gone by when I had lease cars I used to find it impossible to get new tyres until the old ones were down to 1.6mm.

I now change at 2.5mm which I regard as a reasonable compromise between cost and safety.

Nsar

In the torrential rain last night my sun-roof leaked, probably because the drain holes were a wee bit clogged up/couldn't cope.

Two points:
1. Add clearing your sun-roof drain holes to that list of little jobs you should do from time to time
2. Does anyone know how to get rooflining material to tighten back up again? Running the aircon at nuclear setting today has made some difference, I haven't tried a hairdryer yet, but any sane suggestions would be most welcome. Read more