June 2003
I have a Nissan Micra 1.0 16v 1993 (the newer shape one).
It starts and idles OK, but complete loss of power when the accelerator is pressed and cuts out.
I have changed the fuel filter, rotor arm and distributor cap with no significant benefit.
Could it be a faulty fuel pump or something else?
Many Thanks
Keith Read more
JC, on Top Gear on Sunday, put as strong a case for the Jaguar as he did for I K Brunell - and I tend to agree with him on both - IK {Brunell} and the XJ {Jag}
He appears to say that the Jag is better than anything Merc, Audi or BMW etc have to offer.
So is the XJ still 'The Best Car In the World' as the Series I Jag was named by the motoring press over 30 years ago?
I tend to think so - but I'll never know, can't even afford the 8 year old £6k example that he talked of!
If i turned up at a Jaguar Dealers in my 1991 Volvo Estate, would they give me a 24 hour test drive in an XJR ????????????
but then JC spoils it and says the new VW could be a match ??????????? Course not - a VW - come on !!!!!!!!!!!!
Is JC on a retainer from Ford?
Paul {Forest of Bowland} Read more
Given his merciless slagging of the Focus RS, I think not...
Been looking at Triumph Stags
Many say converted to Rover V8 3.5
Cost / originality aside,
whci is better
a Stag with Triumph 3.0 - often 3 speed auto
or a 5 speed Rover V8?
I understand that the Rover V8 weighs less?
Ta
paul
Paul {Forest of Bowland} Read more
Yep HXJ
you're right about the fax machine, but the fax as we know it was a 1980s invention?
Is this the longest post ever?
The first facsimile equipment for use in communications was the chemical telegraph invented by Alexander Bain (1810-1877) in 1842 and patented during the following year. This consisted of a metallic contact resting on a moving paper slip saturated with an electrolytic solution. The wire and the tape formed part of an electric circuit and when current flowed, discoloration of the tape occurred.
It is thought that the first working model of Bain's chemical telegraph was constructed and operated at about the time of the World Fair held in London in 1851. At this fair a second facsimile machine was demonstrated by Bakewell, who had been granted the relevant patent in 1848.
In principle the two machines operated in similar fashion using damp electrolytic paper as a recording medium and relied for transmission on a scanning stylus being in physical contact with the text of the message, the text being in relief form with raised lettering. Both systems also depended on associated pendulums and electromagnets for synchronisation. The Bain machine was essentially a flat bed machine while in Bakewell's model the relief text and receiving electrolytic papers were wound on drums.
For many years the development of facsimile equipment was directed towards improving the mechanics of the scanning and reproduction functions. In 1865 the first working trials for a commercially viable facsimile machine was set up in France by an Italian, Caselli. Shortly after this Meyer facsimile machines were also tried out in the French telegraph systems.
Although the Caselli and Meyer machines had been brought into service there were still two major areas of difficulty to be investigated: synchronisation and contact transmission. A practical method of synchronising the early facsimile machines was finally worked out, and culminated in the La Cour tuning fork controlled motor synchronisation.
Facsimile was first used commercially in France as an electromechanical telegraph. In 1870 there were some 17 Meyer facsimile instruments in service in the French telegraph system in conjunction with 4000 electromechanical telegraph machines. It appears that the facsimile facility was used to a large extent by the French government and to carry information relating to stockbroking. The main advantages seen at this time were the virtual elimination of errors in transmission and the availability of a facsimile signature.
The contact type transmitters used up to the early years of the 20th century were not satisfactory and limited the speed of transmission via facsimile. This was overcome through the development of a suitably sensitive photoelectric cell by Dr Arthur Korn of Germany in 1902, and his application of this cell to phototelegraphy work. The technique of this system was to transmit light through a photographic negative of the original, wound on a glass cylinder, to a photocell which converted the light pulses to electrical signals. The receiving medium was sensitised paper and the picture was reproduced in positive form. By 1910 Korn had established phototelegraphy links from Berlin to Paris and London, and in 1922 successfully transmitted by radio a picture from Rome to New York. In 1926 a commercial radio link for facsimile working was opened between the London office of the Marconi Wireless and Telegraph Company, and the New York office of the RCA.
The need to have material photographed to provide a negative for transmission, and the consequential high cost of the equipment developed on this principle, led to further research, and a system of transmission based on reflected light was evolved. In 1935 the Associated Press of the USA installed a country-wide network based on this system.
By the 1920s pictures for publication in newspapers were being transmitted around the world. Later developments of the service in the 1930's included the introduction of weather maps and wire photo services. Technology had improved sufficiently beyond the late 19th century equipment to ensure that facsimile was a technically viable proposition even though the basic techniques and concept were unchanged.
Among the later adaptations of facsimile service by a telegraph company was that of the Western Union in the 1930s when they made facsimile machines available in public places for the transmission of messages to the nearest Western Union office. The message was then forwarded from the office in the normal telegraph manner. Unfortunately this system proved prone to vandalism and was phased out. Western Union was involved in another similar venture: "Desk Fax" introduced in 1948. Using this system private companies who rented transmitters were able to send short messages via a Western Union telegraph office.
The main area in which facsimile proved successful in augmenting telegraph facilities was in the transmission of photographs i.e. phototelegrams - mainly newspaper pictures, but also pictures of documents, machine drawings and fingerprints. This service grew from the start of the New York - London link in 1926 and continued to thrive. By 1950 access to 24 countries was available and in 1963 the Post Office phototelegraphic system was operating services to and from 56 European terminals and 38 extra-European terminals. In January 1976 these figures were 47 and 51 respectively to a total of 65 countries.
The success of phototelegraphy was not reflected in other uses devised for facsimile. Attempts to introduce home news broadcasts in manuscript form and thus bring facsimile into the residential market failed. Such systems were tried as early as 1929 in America and throughout the 1930s. Once television was introduced there was no possibility of facsimile competing.
As a telecommunications medium facsimile remained from the 1930's to the early 1960's essentially a system for specialised applications with sophisticated expensive machines - the two main sections of use being in distributing weather charts and in the newspaper industry.
Although suitable telephone coupling devices were available from the 1930s it was not until the 1960s that relatively cheap facsimile machines were available for connection to the PSTN. Growth in the market was prompted by declining postal services in the USA, and in Japan by the pictorial nature of the alphabet. These new machines became known as document facsimile machines and were used for transmitting handwritten, typed or printed text and drawings. A contributory factor to the late development of a simple dial-up facsimile unit was the relatively late stage at which solid state techniques were introduced to the facsimile system.
Europe lagged behind the USA and Japan, but early growth followed agreed standards on machine design by the International Telegraph and Telephone Consultative Committee (CCITT). The introduction of Group 1 standard in 1968 was a significant step in the development of facsimile, despite slow and unreliable terminals and lack of full compatibility. It took 6 minutes to transmit an A4 page, but the machine stimulated interest in the concept of sending text and graphic material by telephone around the world instead of heavy reliance on the postal service.
A Group 2 standard was agreed in 1976, which halved the time of transmission to 3 minutes and improved quality with a scanning density of 100 lines per inch. But the density remained unsatisfactory for sending documents containing small print and the time for transmission still meant that a 10 page document took half an hour to receive.
A further CCITT standard was agreed in 1980 for Group 3 machines, which used digital transmission techniques and took less than one minute per page with an improved scanning resolution of 200 lines per inch. All were compatible and could communicate with most Group 2 machines regardless of supplier.
Paul {Forest of Bowland}
I have a 2.0 Vectra GLS with factory-fitted 15" alloys wearing a set of 195/65/15 Michelins. I have been offered a very nice set of 16" alloys off an SRi at a good price. I'd like to fit them to my car but I wanted to check a few things first. Sorry if these are stupid questions but I'm not an expert...
1. What size of tyre do I need to fit to the larger 16" wheels? (presumably I can't just transfer my existing tyres.. or can I?)
2. Will the larger wheels have any effect on the steering/braking characteristics of the vehicle?
Thanks,
Rob.
Read more
I know - what a retard!!! Of course the 15" tyres won't fit on the 16" wheels! In my defence, I figured that out on the way home from work last night.
Thanks for the advice David, much appreciated. I think I'll go for the wheels as (IMO) they look 'wheel' nice (get it?). Sorry.
Hi All
At last, a broker flogging the 2003MY Honda Jazz for £1200 off the list price (thanks to HJ for the info). Has anyone used DC Cook Direct before? I have never been with a broker. Has anyone encountered any problems with this company, or are there any pitfalls which i need to be wary of?
Any help you can give would be greatly appreciated, and treated in the strictest confidence if necessary!!
BW Read more
Thank you for your comments, both. I had checked with them and they assured me that it was an 03 model with 3 years warranty, and i was aware of the on-costs of metallic paint and VED. Since then i have found out that a local Honda main dealer has the model and colour i want in stock, so i will probably take that route. Call it my conservative (with a small 'c') nature!
Cheers
Browsing the web today, I found an MX5 turbo for sale.
As I've never knowingly seen one before, I wonder if anyone has any (and I mean any at all) experience of them. I've looked at the CBC breakdown already.
Read more
Well Maz I've only ever span her once and the tyres were low but still legal so I reckon you need to have decent tyres but she's not twitchy at all. The power is progressive with the turbo and drives like a torquey 2 litre rather than a peaky blown motor. She's white with black roof and has different nose cone and five spoke alloys. She was rebuilt as a turbo about 26k ago with a recon engine and fully serviced since, in the process of servicing her again actually. I'd probably be asking more than book value for her as she's is special and in very good condition probably around 5 and half mark. Let me know if you're interested and I can probably dig out some pics to send!! Cheers
This may have come up before but I am a little perplexed with what could be going on here.
I have a 1990 BMW E30 (318i) with an M40 engine. I service the car myself completely since I have owned it and have always used the onboard service indicator to determine when the service is due.
On the most recent oil change I noticed the valve gear to be unusually noisy (The car has done 146K). I have been using fully synthetic oil in the past and have only changed brand to a Halfords own brand fully synthetic oil on this last change. The viscosities are the same (and protection factors A3/B3 etc) as my previous oil.
When I start the engine, it is quiet and smooth and idles smoothly but after driving for about 30 seconds the valve gear gets noisy (Like a tappet / cam lifter not adjusted correctly) yet there is no degredation of performance from the engine. When I am sitting at lights for instance there is this tappety noise for a short time and then it goes away to leave the normal engine noise.
Am I right in thinking that this is an oil starvation problem rather than a tappet problem - If the tappets are worn wouldn't it be noisy all the time? After a long run on the motorway the engine runs relatively quietly, except when I am waiting at lights or travelling slowly in low gears. I have taken the rocker cover off and briefly turned the engine over to see if the oil is correctly lubricating the cam and there is a spray from the oil pipe onto each cam eccentric indicating that there isn't a oil blockage.
The question remains, should I put the car into a workshop for further investigation, or should I return to my original oil at the next change? The engine does not burn any oil and doesn't appear to be low on power, the fuel economy has not changed either.
Thanks for any advice Read more
Well, The car went in for its MOT last week and failed on a few minor things, Suspension bushes and a ball joint. I also took the car to an engine specialist in Southampton who has been reported to know all about BMW's. He has said that it is a regular thing with these engines and agrees with the comments other people have made on this forum.
Euro car parts (set of 8 Tappets) = £56 + VAT
Fitting = £40
More expensive than an oil change but it now sounding very noisy. I feel this month is going to be expensive.
Thanks for the advice everyone.
Mike
A bit of a bugbear of mine this. What does anyone else think?
Near us is an urban dual carriageway with a small retail park on one side. If you are heading into town and want to go into the park you have to drive past it to a gap in the central reservation and do a U turn back onto the other carriageway and then a left into the park. The gap in the carriageway is traffic light controlled so this is a perfectly legal manouvere. The gap is also rather wide and can accommodate 2 cars side by side. There is also a sort of short slip road thing on the dual carriageway to allow a small queue to form.
Now, what annoys me is when I stop at the light another car will almost invariably come and stop next to me. More or less the only reason to stop in this gap is to go into the retail park and since the distance from the gap to the entrance is short it oftens results in some cutting up.
Is it Ok to stop in this side by side manner?
Read more
Saw through that one Robin. I mean it couldn't be a mobile stationary shop now could it?
With the new A3 coming this month, what's the probability of 1 to 2 yr old 5dr A3s dropping in price and if so how long before we can expect to see any price movement. I appreciate that the new model is 3dr only at launch so the effect on old model 5drs may be less. My wife wants to change fairly soon and I wonder how long it's worth waiting. Your views welcome! Read more
We are shortly due to change our car and I want to take the current private number plate and transfer it to the new car. I have no idea what to do to achieve this!
Advice please experts
Thanks very much in advance
CavV6 and cavWeb fan.
Read more
I recently did this, a few weeks before selling my old car, I transferred the number to retention, (form from DVLA office). I then gave the certificate with private number on to the dealer, who registered my new car with my private reg. Be carefull though, you have to send off your V5 to do this, so make sure you give yourself time (Although they said 2 weeks to get it back, it came back about 5 days later!)


Hi,
Thanks for the help, it appears to be the fuel pump.
Though nissan want £104 + vat (apparently only available through nissan dealers) :o
Cheers again
Keith