February 2009
I took my 1996 Fiat Punto to be mot'd it needed 250+ work doing so I had this done and paid for it. When I got in my car I noticed a 8" crack in my windowscreen I immediatly told the garage who admitted it was their fault as it had happened in thier care, and would contact their insurance.
I have waited a week and not heard anything so contacted them today and was told that after speaking to their insurance they will not be replacing the windowsceen and 'it may of had a chip in it and the frost has caused this to happen so they are not at fault.'
I have checked my advisory notice and no chip is mentioned on there, I was wondering where I stand on this matter and who is at fault?
Also the odometer reading is out by +30000 miles????
I would appreciate any help at all on this matter as I cant afford to buy a new windowscreen and really need my car for work.
Many Thanks in advance,
Lucy Read more
Thats right, 3 years for six lives. Surely so called ' professional drivers ' like this should be subject to bigger sentences to make them work that little bit harder on their concentration .
'Mr Rushton said Da Silva admitted in court he had seen the electronic signs warning the M6 was closed and said he reduced his speed "but could not explain how the collision happened".
Mr Rushton added: "The prosecution said that it was clear that for a period of around a minute, Paulo da Silva was not paying proper attention to the road and fatally hit the Stathams' van with his 40-tonne lorry."'
tinyurl.com/cu2cz2
Read more
Having said that, if one's careless driving leads to horrific consequences for others, a jail sentence is entirely justifiable.
Can anyone tell me why it is recommended that you disconnect the negative battery terminal before taking the MAF sensor out for cleaning ? Read more
Makes no difference with battery connected or disconnected.What could make a difference is if the maf is un-plugged with the ignition switched on.hth
Arnold Clark (see website) currently have £605 off the fixed RRP of a Fiat 500 1.2 Lounge, which works out much cheaper than even adding a few extras to the very basic £8100 Fiat 500 1.2 Pop.
This deal seemingly does not apply in conjunction with Fiat's PCP deal where the price then reverts to £9500 costing £146 for 36 months (£900 deposit) and a Guaranteed Future Value of £4505 on 8000 miles. Any dealer will offer you this. It still works out cheaper than a 6 year loan of £8895 though.
With the worsening euro exch rate the cost of Fiats and other imports can only go up.
Read more
>>get her to test drive a panda 100 hp bet ya she would change her mind
In my albeit limited experience (one wife - to date) many women don't buy on the basis of how the car drives on a test drive. SWMBO has never test driven a car she has bought - she's had me drive it and sat in it (in her 500 the back of it as the sales guy wouldn't sit in the back!) She fell in love with the looks and her Picanto was gone! Didn't look at anything else, hated the looks of the Panda and the MINI and the Clio and the Yaris and the Jazz and .... Last thing I was going to do was guide her towards a car that might be a bit quicker or a tad more composed over a bump and have her regret not going for the 500 every time she got in the car for the next 3 or 4 years.
FWIW I disagree with the comments about impossibly bumpy ride and no guts - SWMBO's 1.2 goes well if you keep the revs over 3,000 - it picks up really well from 4,000 and is rapid enough with an excellent gearchange and light controls. OK in town you don't drive it like that but its fine and a comfortable, bright and quiet place to be. Perfectly at ease on the motorway and enough torque to accelerate from 70 mph if you need. I wouldn't have one myself as I do too many miles and the seats are short on squab and when you lower them the back of the seat base dips but not the front leaving an uncomfortable hole where something should be supporting. The C pillars are too wide making reversing much more difficult than it should be but helping the rigidity no doubt. None of this matters to SWMBO she loves it as much as her 2CVs from yesteryear.
I note with interest that Hyundai have tried to answer the question of insufficient toilet facilities along our road network. The new i20 is described as 'commodious', though I think we ought to be told which seat has got the hole in it ;-) Read more
Monring All,
Just hoping somebody might eb able to offer some advice.
My Sister is currently at Uni, and is insured to drive my mothers Polo when she is home. During one of said trips home (18 months ago), my sister is alleged to have knocked somebodys wingmirror off along a narrow road.
The first we knew of this was a lteer from the Police saying she had been spotted at the scene. She responded to them, denying the claim.
Next a letter arrives fromt he Insurance company, detailing the claim and saying that they will be treating it as a fault incident. A quick phone call to the Insurance company revelas they have an independent witness and a picture of my mother rear numberplate. Whilst my sister still denies it, and a picture of somebodeys number plate seems scant evidence, my parents feel theres nothing more they can do, other than admit fault and let the insurance sort it out. Presume all is well and carry on as usual.
However, on saturday morning a letter arrives from Northamton County Court detailing a small claims court summons, for £1200! The claimant is after £690 for a hire car, and the rest is repair cost for the wing mirror.
Supposing my sister is guilty, my two main questions are these......
1) Why would you need £690 worth of a hire car for a smashed wing mirror on a v-reg golf GTI?
2) Whay have the insurance companies not settled between them, and why has it gone to small claims?
Thanks in advance
{sorry, pet hate of mine where cars are still referred to as having wing mirrors, hence the edit in the subject header. DD} Read more
I would have your day in court. My sister has twice been to court due to car accidents,and won.This was despite her insurers originally wanting to settle 50/50. she has refused and gone to court to prove her innocence. In both cases the cleverness of her barrister soon unravelled the pack of lies the other party told and had them tied up in knots and contradicting themselves.If your Innocent, the truth will out.
Hi I have ford focus 2.0 tdci and what i have noticed recenlty is a loss of power in third gear at 3000 revs, the car suddenly feels like it is going to stall and losing power. It suddenly kicks back in and is fine again. It is always around 3000 - 4000 revs, but more often nearer the 3000. any advise would be appreciated
Read more
Part of post snipped because it was no longer in context once I'd tidied up the thread - PG
I personally think ANPR is a great tool if it helps rid roads of uninsured drivers etc etc but I also feel it is a very reactive system. We let people buy and sell cars, drive cars etc and its only when they happen to pass through ANPR that they get caught and really, the fines etc are not a deterrent at all as can be seen with the number of repeat offenders.
There needs to be a better system of car ownership, the car is yours until DVLA know otherwise. That is supposed to happen just now but how many times do we see that a car has no registered keeper? Read more
Discuss ANPR not each others' thoughts etc
Hello
I currently have a 1998 Vectra Hatch and was looking to either replace it with a newer model or a different make altogether.
I like the boot space size because i can comfortably carry my equipment in there for my work without having to pull down the seats and take out the parcel shelf.
i was wondering if i changed make would anyone know if the Nissan Primera (old and new shapes) boot space is the same size or bigger than the vectra? also poss. considering a Passat or Mondeo as well. Any help on this would be appreciated thanks.
Read more
how cheesed off am i?
there really must be something better than paint on steel for car exterior?
Read more
Did you do it, or was it done deliberately by someone who was jealous that you had got a brand new car?


> It's skating on very thin ice to claim for some damage that's already been incurred ..
I can see the purity of this argument, but it says that merely because I don't know the cause of the crack, I can't claim. What about the trader? - he probably doesn't know either (I'm sure he didn't) so he can't claim on his warranty ? As ins.co's offer special terms for screens, they must be well aware of this situation. It is a safety matter in any case. I agree that in an ideal world, the trader should have fixed it, perhaps at his own expense, but he didn't.