October 2005
I've just asked the AA Routefinder to suggest a route from Sheffield to Oban and it's come up with M1, A1, A66 then M6 and so on. I thought the obvious route (and the one I took last time) was A57, M76, M60, M61, M6 etc.
Is there something happening to the roads round Manchester that I don't know about? Or is the M1, A1 A66 route actually quicker?
Thanks! Read more
thanks to all that responded to my usa car rental question
the dodge neon is sounding like a good deal..but im going to do a fair amount of miles in it and keep it for 3 weeks
anyone driven a late one..what are they like?? i dont want to be bombing about in a really nasty car
or can anyone comment on what car they got Read more
I had a Neon in Toronto some years ago from Hertz. It was ok, but I think the suspension was softer than the UK version. Had no problems and cheap on the gas.
Hi Iv got a problem with my rover 200 engine . while acclerating the speed cutting off and back again is like the engine (or gaskets..) is droping compression .
is it something to do with valves ; pistons????
could you help me plz!
thanks for ur informations
Read more
What date is it?.sounds more like an HT fault/leads/ distributor cap-rotor or coil breakdown under load
--
Steve
8 < SNIP 8<
Yes, I know it's Friday, but we still don't allow the backroom to lower itself to that level, thankyou.
DD. Read more
For sale ad in The Times
tinyurl.com/cf3ww
{Link changed as we don't allow direct links to the times - copy and paste the tinyurl link into your address bar of your usual browser if you wish to view; but as No FM2R has pointed out, the link doesn't take you directly to the relevant article - DD} Read more
Owned by a Mr. Lobb.
I am bored.
What is the cheapest fun intro to motorsport ?
I'm thinking hill climbs, rally, track. Dont fancy grasstrack. I would like to do something which can feed through and improve my ordinary driving (I am of course excellent already ;-) By which I mean vehicle control, understanding limits etc that you cant/shouldnt play with on the open road.
I know that there are road rallies which seem to be about mapreading and planing, and I could do trackdays but neither of those really appeal.
Any suggestions ?
Thanks
M Read more
Check out:
www.mroc.co.uk/mainindex.html
and have a look at the Comp Safari link. This involves
timed circuits of a off road track at up to 70
- 80mph. Did it with a mate's dad in the eighties.
Very exciting, on tree lined forest tracks in a V8 powered
SWB Land Rover.
I think going straight to Comping is not the best route for the unititiated. You need a highly specified well put together vehicle that will not be road legal, to either build or buy one of these will set you back a fair bit plus the budget for running a season will be high due to the regualr repairs that will be repaired.
I would suggest trying a bit of RTV'ing first of all with a fairly standard vehicle that, if you like that you could gain some experience there and then move up to CCV which is the halfway house between RTV and Comp Safari. I would imagine Comp Safari's to be quite a way down the line from just starting out.
www.staffs-shrops-lrc.co.uk/trial.html
Just been stopped by a mobile VOSA unit who claimed the windows on my old Land Rover Discovery are excessively tinted (they were factory fitted by Land Rover). They've issued me a prohibition notice & I have to get the front & side windows changed within 10 days or risk prosecution. Also have to have another MOT done (current one is only 2 months old!!)as well as going to the local VOSA centre to get the prohibition order lifted. The tinted windows are not part of the MOT process. What in God's name is going on here!!
{Subject header amended so as not to be confused with yet another general discussion on tinted windows - DD} Read more
I spoke to a VOSA bod this afternoon at a family party. They are clamping down and have been looking at windows in a more serious way over the last couple of years.
I am told that the standard policy is that for windows passing less than 30% of light, vehicle is immediatly off the road (They recently came across an suv which had only 2% through the side windows - and the driver had sunglasses on!). 30% - 45% is followed by the action that started this thread, 10 days to sort out and fix. 45-70% gets a warning and they note the vehicle - don't get caught again. In all cases they will try to encourage the immediate removal of the film.
(dont hold me to the figures - I didnt write them down)
Apparently, a lot of 'privacy' glass is not done at the factory but at the dealers, either by the dealer or by a third party so no manufacturer involvment. Some dealers have had action taken against them as well, although I didnt ask under what legislation.
People do get fined, a recent case involved someone who got a notice, took the car in to be checked after removing the glass. The car had to be passed as OK, but when the owner was stopped again they prosecuted. £500+costs.
It seems that it doesnt take much to drop the figure below 70%, even quite a light tint combined with the standard tinted glass. The person I spoke to had not verified it, but it is reported that some of the new small bmw/mini's arrive from the factory with a figure of 68%. If that is the case then I guess that there will be some activity between vosa and bmw that will clarify the situation.
Hi
Do grooves in tyres increase cornering traction? I'm thinking if the edges of the groove catch on the ground surface and help prevent sideways sliding?
--------------
Mike Farrow Read more
No. Grooves decrease cornering ability hence F1 having increased the number of grooves over time to try and reduce cornering speeds. The groove allows the tread to move sidewise under cornering thereby reducing the overall grip of the tyre. In dry weather a true slick is the best performing tyre.
Fullchat
I am considering changing my 2001 Punto for a nearly new Panda. My local Fiat dealership is offering brand new 55 reg 1.1 Active Pandas at £4995 on the road which seems like an absolute bargain to me. Alternatively they have 12 month old 1.2 Dynamic models at £5295. Has anyone experience of these cars? I know HJ rates them highly and it seems a more modern car than the Punto which is due to be replaced. Would you think it better to go for the 1.2 model with 12k showing rather than brand new 1.1 base with zero miles? My Punto is a 1.2 and I imagine in a smaller Panda it would be plenty fast enough.
Thanks Read more
I have had a 1.2 Dynamic (SkyDome) since new and have done nearly 18,000 miles. It is a fantastic car - economical (over 55mpg according to the computer) and great to drive. I can report no problems whatsover with it. It's red by the way - and the yellow is definitely a better choice than the green, which was originally called Guacomole Green - yum! Can't help you with deciding about the 1.2 or the 1.1 Active, but I think it's really nice to have a brand new car that hasn't been driven by someone else...
Excellent choice either way!!
Having seen a couple of threads where some confusing information has been given about load transfer under braking and cornering, I thought I might have a go at clarifying the subject.
Firstly, I want to restrict the post to steady state behaviour - by which, I mean once the car is settled into the corner, or has been braking for some time, and the car body is no longer continuing to roll or pitch any further. Considering the full response including transients is much too dull for a leisure time activity!
Tyre load transfer under braking is *solely* due to the fact that the tyre force occurs at ground level and the vehicles centre of gravity is above ground level. (This is the vital idea people tend to get wrong)
A pitching moment or torque is created by the braking force multiplied by the height of the centre of gravity - this is entirely balanced by the load transfer multiplied by the wheelbase. Whether the braking is done by the front or rear wheels does *not* affect the amount of load transfer.
Note here, I'm talking about how much extra vertical force is pushing the front wheels down into the road, not how far the vehicle's body pitches - that's a different matter.
The response of the vehicle body to this weight transfer, i.e. how far the car pitches is proportional to the weight transfer, the pitch angle, while governed by the stiffness of the suspension, may be modified by anti-dive and anti-squat suspension geometry, so that the pitch angle under braking can be related to how much braking occurs on the front compared to the rear.
Exactly the same situation occurs in cornering - with one extra significant complication.
The *total* amount load transfer across the car is governed by the height of the centre of gravity, and the track width of the car, together with the car's mass and lateral acceleration, that's all there is to it.
The amount of roll angle is governed by the roll stiffness of the car. But, this may be modified, both by suspension geometry, and by devices like anti-roll bars.
Here's the complication - in roll, the weight doesn't need to be transferred equally front and rear. As an aid to picturing this, consider chopping a hypothetical car into two functioning halves, left and right, only joining them with a ball joint type bearing at the centre of gravity. If you were to drive this car in a straight line and then brake, the two halves of the car would still move as one (you have mirror symmetry about the cut). If you took another car, and replaced the cut along the length of the car with a cut across the car with the same type of ball joint at the centre of gravity and try to go round a corner, you would find that either the front of the car, or the rear would roll further - depending which end had the stiffer suspension in roll.
An anti roll bar attracts more vertical load. For example, consider a car with a 50:50 weight distribution and a stiff front anti roll bar (or a suspension geometry naturally stiff in roll). During a corner, the anti roll bar will make the front outer wheel carry more than 50% of the load transferred from side to side.
For a given lateral or longitudinal acceleration, all you can do to reduce load transfer is to reduce the height of the centre of gravity, reduce the total mass, or increase the track or wheelbase respectively.
Number_Cruncher
Read more
To amplify a little on Cheddar's reply;
For a given amount of deceleration (or a given amount of total braking force), the amount of weight transfer is not at all dependent upon whether it is produced at the front or rear - it happens purely because the centre of gravity is some distance above the road surface.
Cheddar is quite right to point out that the front wheels become more heavily loaded and can produce more braking force than the rear before the wheels loose traction.
The equivalent in cornering is that the outside wheels are more heavily loaded than the inside. For passenger cars, an onerous load case for carrying out stress analysis on the front suspension was a combined braking and cornering load - if I had a better memory, I would be able to remember the values in 'g' for each direction.
Number_Cruncher


Well www.mappy.com is my usual but it doesn't recognise Oban!