Smart #3 Review 2024
Smart #3 At A Glance
If mention of Smart cars still makes you think of those diminutive, clever and progressively-uglier-with-each-generation two-seater citymobiles, then the firm’s latest models will be something of a surprise — a smart move or not? Read our full Smart #3 review to find out.
Smart’s former sole custodian, Mercedes, now shares ownership of the brand with Chinese auto giant Geely, which in turn possesses Volvo. Smart’s resultant re-focus has shifted to larger, family-oriented, all-electric offerings. This more pragmatic approach to mirroring customer demand has resulted in two hatchback-shaped SUVs so far — the Smart #1 and Volvo EX30.
With its rather striking coupe electric SUV form, the Smart #3 is very similar to its cousins under the skin, but its shape makes it quite hard to pigeon-hole in terms of rivals. Given prices range from around £33,000 and £45,500, you might consider the Volkswagen ID.3 and impressive Renault Megane E-Tech or something like the Kia Niro Electric.
Five flavours of Smart #3 are available, topped by the twin-motor Brabus model, which boasts all-wheel drive and the capacity to outsprint an Audi RS3 from a standstill to 62mph.
Driving range varies on the trim choice — the entry-level Pro can go for 202 miles between recharges, while the Premium with a larger battery and heat pump has a claim of 283 miles. The Brabus’s extra performance trims that higher figure to 258 miles.
Once aboard, you will appreciate the Smart #3’s roominess but doubts will immediately surface about how resilient the plastic trim is. Start the car up and prepare to be baffled by the cartoon cheetah prancing around the screen — luckily Android Auto and Apple CarPlay are available to hide that nonsense.
There is no stop/start button in the Smart #3, you just get in, engage D for Drive and go. That’s fine but it’s always an uncomfortable feeling walking away from a car you haven’t actually switched off.
In all, then, the Smart #3 is a good-looking, competent and competitively priced car desperately trying to shed the shackles of one or two engineering and software decisions sufficiently daft that we’d find them hard to live with. Pity.