October 2006
This weekends' HJ column had a comment from a motorcyclist that tinted windows prevent him making eye contact with the driver. "If I can't see him, can he see me ?"
I'd like to support him. It's a matter of relative brightness on either side of the window. When the the day is a bright one the driver will be able to see out perfectly well. But can he at night ?
Deviating; the first time that I saw really dark tints was in Jeddah, where the 4x4s have fairly normal front and side screens and a chauffuer's mid window. The rear windows, and the chauffuer's window were so dark that it was impossible to see through from the outside. (Not that I tried; not advisable !!). I got the impression that the drivers wives etc. were in the back without their veils. Read more
Posting this for reference.
Paraphrased:
Motorists pay more than £44.6 billion a year in fuel tax, vehicle excise tax and Vat.
Total Whitehall budget for roads (building and maintaining) is £7.3 billion.
http ://tinyurl.com/y5kcj7
Read more
>>Auz and the US solved the road usage problem the simple way: abolish road tax, and charge higher fuel tax instead. So, the more you drive, the more you use the roads, the more you pay.
>>The Aussie's bright idea was to also add third party insurance as a fuel tax, so all third-party claims processed through the courts are paid from a central fund. Result: less insurance fraud, because equitable payments are in the treasury's interest, and no losses from uninsured drivers.
I like the thought of these solutions, however I can still see a few extra solutions and some extra problems.
1. Abolishing road tax would certainly ensure that no car would be without tax, as it was included in the fuel tax. This would reduce the number of people needed to administer road tax - a cost saving for all of us.
2. Adding 3rd party insurance to fuel costs would also mean no uninsured car on the road, great for other drivers whose cars have been damaged in an accident knowing their car will be repaired or they will be compensated if written off. This only replaces the proportion of our existing insurance that goes into a central fund to meet these claims. The big drawback to this would be that good low risk drivers will pay more as a proportion than high risk groups.
3. High risk drivers driving old low value powerful cars would not to have any additional insurance as the current statutory minimum has already been met. Or should all drivers have compulsorary insurance to drive vehicles, this would be price according to age, risk and cars within certain bands?
4. At present all cars over 3 years old have to have an MOT, and this has been checked, along with insurance, when road tax is applied for. Computerisation has recently meant records are available to check both. Would this mean MOT reminders would be issued to the registered keeper? Would the ANPR then be used to find cars without an MOT, rather than road tax/insurance? If so this would be a good safety check for all road users to take unsafe cars off the road.
5. The cost of fuel would rise, I would guess, by about 20p a litre to cover the road tax and 3rd party insurance. Not a popular move politically, but you would not have road tax or 3rd party insurance to pay. Once our pockets grew used to this benefit, I feel sure vehicle maintence standards would get better as well.
6. There would be no way for foreign drivers not paying, unless over for a short trip with fuel they brought with them. This would mean they pay slightly more than at present to use our roads and we would be guaranteed they had 3rd party insurance.
7. The large rise in fuel costs would mean that fuel smuggling would become more likely as the profits would be greater. Alternatively, other fuels might be used (chip oil instead of diesel) to save money. This might mean large teams of customs testers checking legal fuel is being used.
There may be additional points I have not thought of, but overall I think it would be a brilliant idea.
--
Roger
I read frequently, but only post when I have something useful to say.
I saw two incidents recently where rathwer expensive add-ons were removed.
1.0 A young chap with an air-dam down to about 2 inches from the ground entered the fast food resturant (yes, that one !) car park. With a resounding clatter the speed bump removed his air dam. I wonder how long he had had it on.
2.0 A car with one of those roof top streamined capsule luggage boxes entered the council recycling depot. There is a sign reading barrier height 5' 9". Nobody notices signs, and the driver didn't. Another resounding clatter and luggage scattered all over the entrance. Read more
Took my old 330d (owned by BiL whose away in Canada doing some low flying stuff where nobody complains) to the local dealer today to attend to an Airbag warning light - just felt slightly miffed (only slightly). The car has now got in excess of a 100k on it and has had never had anything replaced on it beyond service items - not even a bulb.
The car was booked in and reeived the usual service whilst there - the diagnostic revealed a faulty bit of wiring loom which was replaced - which wasn;t horrendously expensive, what miffed me was being charged £25.00 for the diagnostic check - which I know is a Laptop check plugged into a socket and takes 5 minutes. As I say I suppose you expect to get ripped off butthere got it off my chest now. Read more
.. an enigmatic smile and just said "this one's for Dalglish". He was dead chuffed ..
>>
pugugly - thank you on behalf of the stranger you did the "good deed" for , you are a man of your word.
I had both sets of rear wheel bearings replaced 15 months ago by a main dealer on my Honda Accord. Mileage at that time was about 65,000 miles. However, one side has gone again after approx 20,000 miles. The dealer said that the parts were only covered by a one year warranty so they would not replace them for free. I asked them to consider fitting them for free if I payed for the parts. They are still saying no. I feel that either there was a fault with the bearings or they where not fitted correctly. Can I claim that they were not fit for purpose and put pressure on them to replace them by suggesting I will go to the small claims court? The cost of replacement is £200. Is this a reasonable price? Read more
I've also experienced a tyre causing this on my old Focus. Inner edge had worn strangely and had "steps" in it. Caused a drone just like a wheel bearing.
New tyres and silence for the remaining 30,000 miles I had the car.
Cheers
DP
The temp gauge on my Mondeo (Mk3, 2.0 Petrol) is taking a long time to register 'normal', whereas up until now it reached 'normal' wihtin about a mile or 2. I had gone about 20 miles yesterday before it was on the normal mark. Checked top hose after short run today and it was warm. Also, after a short stop when I start the engine again, it registers normal again. So any experience as to what is the most likely cause?
Thanks, Y. Read more
At what age/mileage did it go ?
just interested - got an 05 one now
Ta
I have a 53 plate with 23k & in the car by car breakdown HJ states that plastic timing belt tensioners of 1.4 and 1.6 16v engines now failing regularly. What sort of age/mileage does this apply to & what's the best way of preventing it? Read more
It should be noted that these engines have two cambelts& tensioners, the second couples the two cams together. Best also to change the waterpump at the same time.
I have a 54 plate passat 130. It time for new tyres. Has anybody got suggestion as to what type of tyre I should put on my car. I do a 50% spilt between motorways and A roads. Read more
Yes, this is the size I have (205 55 16). I was also thinking P7 next as these were my favourite on my Omega, however, the Primacies have another year or so left, so the market may have changed by then..
Here is a letter written by my wife to a central London borough council, suitably amended so the council isn't named or shamed, although it ought to be. It is the third letter she has had to write so far on this matter.
The only thing I disagree with is her assertion that she is an old person. She is younger than me and I am only verging on middle age. Apart from that I think the letter is exemplary for its restrained indignation.
"I appeal against Penalty Charge Notice Number 00000000 issued on 3 July 2006 on the grounds that the contravention did not occur. I parked my car in a designated pay and display bay and put the correct amount of money in the meter. Your letter of 28 September states that ?it is the driver?s responsibility to always check the conditions of use for any bay, in which they intend to park, to ensure that they have parked in accordance with the regulations?. I had checked the conditions of use and I did park in accordance with the regulations.
"I maintain that it was (the council in question) which violated its own regulations. It claims that ?Pay and display machines are serviced bi-monthly to ensure that they are in good working order. A Parking Attendant will also arrange to have a machine checked if it appears that it may not be working correctly.? The pay and display meter I used was not marked as out of order although the parking attendant I spoke to knew it was out of order. He also knew that all the other pay and display meters in the area were out of order. The meter I used was still not marked out of order half an hour later when my witness tried to use it.
"I would further like to point out the extreme inconvenience imposed on motorists by the (council in question)?s failure to maintain its pay and display meters. A pay and display bay contains space for four or five cars. If the system for a whole area is out of order, and that area is, as you say in your letter of 13 July, one of high demand for parking, then it is extremely unlikely that a motorist will find anywhere at all to park that is within reasonable walking distance of their destination. I am an old person and was accompanied on the occasion in question by my four-year-old granddaughter.
"I would like to point out the further inconvenience of unwittingly using a defective meter which then fails to refund the money inserted. It is absolutely no help for someone who has put all their change in a defective meter to be told to ring a certain telephone number to arrange a refund. If I know I am going to be using a parking meter, I make sure I have the right coins for the amount of time I need. But given the high cost of parking, and the need to put in at once all the coins needed for the time I wanted to park, I did not on this occasion have enough left for a second attempt. It is not feasible to ask a passing stranger to change a banknote. In the XXXXX Square area, where I was, my only option was to go to a shop in DDDDDD or MMMMM NNNN or their immediate environs, where it is not possible to stop let alone park a car. Given the time it would have taken to walk, I would probably have been given a parking ticket anyway."
Read more
What is it about the City of Westminster? People keep mentioning it in these negative contexts.
Never go there myself and nor does my wife I hasten to add.
Smirk.
Wish I could say the same for Camden and Islington which bestrew one of my favourite crosstown routes with tiresome 'temporary' traffic lights.
Temporary indeed.... Permanent more like. Permanent on red it often seems. And one of them today wasd so ill-adjusted or ill-timed or otherwise faulty that stuff was crossing long after green, dangerous, thought the bike overtaking me was going to get it after all the delay but he survived. How long before someone doesn't? And what are these excremental clowns playing at for week after week?
This morning I stupidly reversed my Ford Sierra into a low lying set of brick steps and have damaged the rear left corner of my bumper (not sure if that part is actually the bumper) - but anyway it's no longer fully connected round the corner but still feels secure. The rear facing part (the main bumper) seems undamaged. The thing is my MOT and Tax is due and I'm concerned this will fail the MOT and I understand it will be quite difficult for me to find a replacement bumper for this car.
Does anyone know if it will fail and/or if there's anything I can do to repair it, even just superficially with tape? Other than that the car is in great condition considering it's '92 sierra so I wouldn't want to scrap it. Is it something that might vary depending on the MOT test centre?
Thanks in advance to anyone who can help advise me. Read more
I had similar damage a few years ago on my Orion after my daughter glided into the car in front. Two long cracks and a hole approx. 2 inches by 1.
Covered it with liberal quantities of black insulating tape and it passed another three MOTs no problem.
Good luck.
Profession!! wot 'bout bilders!
MD