Why is my premium so high for a 10 year old, low value car?

I've noted that to insure my car, which is 10 years old and is worth about £1000, costs the same as insuring a similar size car and engine that costs £12,000. In the event of a write off, I will get back approx £650, whereas in the newer car I would expect approx £9000 - £10,000. Also, in three years I will have paid insurance equating to the value of my vehicle - but I would have paid out approx 10 per cent in a new car. Am I paying too much and, if so, what are the reasons for this?

Asked on 13 November 2017 by Mark Millar

Answered by Tim Kelly
You're not insuring just the vehicle, but the inherent risk in using it. The value of the vehicle plays a very small role in the underwritten risk. The "inherent" risk is in you causing injury or loss to others. The easiest way to understand this is to look at the cover for third party liability, should you permanently disable someone in your vehicle, your insurer may well provide up to £20 million of cover. It doesn't matter if you have a ten year old car, or a new car, the loss incurred through your negligence is the same. The proportional risk of the vehicle itself is about 10 - 20 per cent of your premium, the larger part of the premium being for third party claims. For example - when your car was new, it probably cost not far of what you pay now to insure it. The vehicle has not changed, and neither has the underwritten risk that is attached to it, i.e. the insurance group rating.
Similar questions
How much is my premium likely to go up following a minor at-fault bump?
My husband bumped my Land Rover into a bin. The side door is dented and has a large scrape on. What would be cheaper, to claim on the insurance (I have nine years protected NCD) or pay for the repair independently?
Should I take up the option of a courtesy car following an accident? The extent of damage to my Honda Civic has not been estimated as yet but, bearing in mind that the car is a Y registration, it my well...

Value my car