Is legal cover insurance worth it?

I am about to renew my car insurance and have read online the pros and cons of including legal cover. Peace of mind seems to be the main pro and I think the main con is that the insurance company may settle for 50/50 unless there is compelling evidence that the other party is at fault. I have also read that these policies can be restrictive. What is your opinion of legal cover and would you recommend it?

Asked on 31 January 2019 by colin h

Answered by Tim Kelly
I think you may be getting confused, "the main con is that the insurance company settle 50/50" has nothing to do with legal cover. Legal cover is there to cover the cost of solicitors or legal fees in recovering your losses as a result of a third parties negligence. Due to the changes in the Criminal Reform Bill increasing the claims threshold from £1000 to £5000, it means you cannot recover your legal fees for claims less than £1000. This is the direct area where whiplash claims occupy. Last year I would have advised you do not need legal cover, this year and moving forward, I would recommend everyone to purchase it. Just read the terms and conditions and research the provider to make sure the policy covers your demands and needs.
Similar questions
My wife had a non-fault personal injury accident some time back and obviously contacted her insurance company. Her insurance company in turn put her in touch with a Claims Management Company who (from...
I have fully comprehensive car insurance with motor legal cover and personal injury cover. My car was written off by a farmer's loose cow at 4am. My family were injured and I have suffered a big financial...
My car was parked in a private car park and I returned to find damage down the side of the car caused by the car next to it. The person concerned has admitted liability and is claiming on her insurance...


Value my car