Hankook are South Korean. They are OEM fitment on some models of Mondeo so Ford must think they're OK. Apparantly the latest ones (is it Ventus VR4, KO4? - something like that) perform very well.
I have had a pair of Kumho ECSTA tyres (also Korean) fitted to a sports car recently and I can only say that they perform excellently in the dry. Not had chance to try them in the wet yet.
|
Michelin took out a substantial stake in Hankook about two years ago, along with an agreement resulting in Hankook being able to use Michelin's PAX-system run-flat technology.
Compre the price you've paid with the offers at:
www.blackcircles.com/?c1=YSM&source=hankook&kw=han...s
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
What\'s for you won\'t pass you by
|
|
I had a set of Hankook Ventus on the front of my car. To be honest I didnt like the feel of them, just not enough grip. They also wore out quite quickly as well. But two things to bear in mind - my car has a 2.9 VR6 lump and is fron wheel drive, and the fact that they were cheap kind of offset the wear rate.
|
It is interesting that you got some response, as I asked about Hankook tyres earlier this year (I think) and got absolutely nil response.
They do get good ratings on www.mytyres.co.uk
|
Thanks everyone, seems like a good call then seeing as the whole exercise took a little under 5 minutes. Much easier than spending hours searching and going to the back of beyond to have them fitted in order to save a tenner.
Will probably get the same when the other pair's time is up and have all four matching, I find that works a bit better.
Blue
|
Speak as i find replaced Hankook 225/70 R 16's on Hyundai Santa Fe at 44,000 at total cost of £331.02. Fitter informed me that 2 tyres still had 5to 7 thousand on them. How does that compare?
|
The Hankook Ventus K104s that I had on my previous car, a 2.5 V6 Mk3 Mondeo, were great. They cost a third of the price of Coninental Contacts and under half the price of Brigestone Potenzas and wore at a slower rate. They were not as grippy in the wet but just as good dry as the Brigestones but better than the Contis wet, but the Contis were phenominally grippy in the dry. They were a lot quieter than the Contis but noisier than the Bridgestones.
|
|
|
|