Car MPG reading vs calculated reading - why the big discrepancy?

I recently purchased a 2015 Vauxhall Astra diesel 1.6 CDTi, attracted by the high quoted MPG of 76 (combined). I always calculate the cars MPG when I fill up, as well as recording the figure the car says. Having now done close to 10,000 I am surprised that my figures are always so far from what the car says, averaging 7.4mpg lower - both values are also much lower than the quoted MPG, with the car claiming 68.3 and my calculations yielding 60.8. I know that cars seldom reach the quoted MPG, but was wondering what would cause such a big difference between what the car thinks it is doing, and what it is actually doing, and whether this is common to all manufacturers/models?

Asked on 20 April 2017 by Alastair Penman

Answered by Honest John
The system in the car does not measure actual fuel used. It merely calculates it from a set of parameters, and the calculation is usually set to give figures that are 5 - 10 per cent better than reality. 60.8 is good for this engine. I'm only getting 48 from the same Renault engine in a Renault Kadjar 4WD.
Similar questions
I have a Jaguar XE, nearly two years old, which averages around 39mpg on the computer set for long periods. 2000 miles ago I decided to check real mpg by checking fill-ups against mileage and was surprised...
I've been monitoring the mpg of my 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML250 since purchase. I would say 95 per cent of my driving is done around London. According to
I'm currently running a 2009 Volkswagen Golf Plus 2.0 TDI that I've had for almost five trouble-free years. It'll be at 90,000 miles soon and I think I should get out before I have to spend money on it....
Related models
Solid all-rounder that’s good in all areas, cheap to run, excellent value as a used car and loads around, five star Euro NCAP rating.

Value my car