Why don't we hear more about vehicles that run on compressed air?

A while ago, I read an article about a firm in India (was it Tata?) that was developing a car with an engine that ran on compressed air. This seemed a brilliant idea, after all, air is all around us and is plentiful. Apparently the fuel tank was replaced by a compressed air tank, which held enough for about 150 miles. The tank could be replenished either from a compressed air line, or from a built in compressor that could be plugged in to the mains overnight. The engine was then just a pump of sorts. This seems an elegant solution to cheap, CO-free travel. Why have we not heard more of this? Is it because the large motor-producing firms have gone down their own expensive lines of research, and do not want to know about a simpler, cheaper possibility?

Asked on 17 November 2012 by GW, Abergwili, Carmarthen

Answered by Honest John
No, it's because compressed air is not free air. It takes a lot of energy to compress air. That's why scuba diving is so expensive. The idea works in a limited way, but only in a limited way.
Tags:
Similar questions
What in your opion is the most underrated SUV?
I purchased a BMW X3 2019 model in Jan 2023 and it has developed issues with its brake discs. I have given the dealer four opportunities to repair but they have not been able to. I have now rejected...
If I park on a wide pavement with double yellow lines painted on the road an I technically parking on double yellow lines? My son parked his van on a wide pavement so wasn't blocking either the pavement...