"How much did you pay for your car?" "About £5800" "When was that ?" "2 years ago" "It's only worth about £2300 now. But if you take out Gap insurance now, you will get a payout of a total of £5200 if the car was written-off, regardless of whose fault it was. And that's for a cost of £115. Think of it as insurance against depreciation."
Yeah, right. It's not insurance against depreciation though, is it. You only get back the original value(ish) of your car if it's totalled. Hang on though... ...for an outlay of £115, if my car then accidentally gets torched on November 5th by an errant firework - say, -I get given £2900. Yummy!
Anybody see any drawbacks there? (!)
What I don't get is: I could understand how this seems a reasonable option to apply when you first inform your insurer about a change of vehicle, but how can the insurance industry sensibly offer to insure a car for a value near its purchase price, retrospectively, 2 years down the line? What about if I hold off on it for a few more years and wait until my car is only worth £900, and THEN take out the insurance?
|