Review: Peugeot 4007 (2007 – 2012)

Rating:

Terrific 2.2 diesel engine, excellent handling and decent off-road ability. Well equipped.

It's strictly a 5+2 because the rearmost seats are for small children only. Crankshaft oil seal failures are leading to slipping clutches.

Recently Added To This Review

26 September 2014

Report of clutch failure of 2010 Citroen C-Crosser with DCS (Dual Clutch System) automatic transmission at 42,000 miles. Probably caused by the common crankshaft oil seal failure. Quoted £4,500... Read more

23 September 2014

Report of repeat cranksaft oil seal failures on 2.2 belt cam PSA engine contaminating the clutch. Read more

31 December 2012

'Gong' sound means that car battery is failing to hold sufficient charge and needs to be replaced. Read more

Peugeot 4007 (2007 – 2012): At A Glance

Like the Mitsubishi Outlander of which it and the Citroen C-Crosser are really mildly repannelled clones, it's good to drive and conveys a satisfying impression of Japanese build quality.

Peugeot 4007 2007 Road Test

Road Test similar Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 DI-D 2007 Road Test

Road Test simlar Mitsubishi Outlander GX4 2011 Road Test

 

 

 

What does a Peugeot 4007 (2007 – 2012) cost?

Get a finance quote with CarMoney

Peugeot 4007 (2007 – 2012): What's It Like Inside?

Dimensions
Length 4635 mm
Width 1805 mm
Height 1715 mm
Wheelbase 2672 mm

Full specifications

Inside you get five comfortable seats, the rear three split, sliding and slightly reclining 60:40 with a sort of trigger mechanism that tumbles them forwards leaving a completely flat load floor with the folded seats as a bulkhead.

Exactly like the Outlander, a tiny rear bench pulls out of the boot floor, but these seats are so small and legroom so restricted they are only really of any use to midgets and small children. A full size adult could not reasonably be expected to travel in them for more than a couple of miles.

With the rearmost seats tucked away there is 589 litres of luggage space to the window line. And the rear end is split between a hatch and a low tailgate, very useful for sitting on at outdoor events, though the hatch does not extend far enough to keep the rain off your legs.

If you go for the optional satnav, it's a reprogrammable hard disc system like Peugeot's RT4, but actually Mitsubishi's, so no need to get stuck with last century mapping.

Child seats that fit a Peugeot 4007 (2007 – 2012)

Our unique Car Seat Chooser shows you which child car seats will fit this car and which seat positions that they will fit, so that you don't have to check every car seat manufacturer's website for compatibility.

Which car seat will suit you?

What's the Peugeot 4007 (2007 – 2012) like to drive?

Its great asset over the Outlander is its excellent PSA/Ford 2.2 litre twin turbo diesel engine. The same one you'll also find under the bonnet of the Landrover Freelander II, and from the autumn in the Outlander too.

It makes a big difference because where the 140PS VAG diesel in the Outlander lacks low down torque and has to work hard, the PSA 2.2 seems to have exactly the power the vehicle needs. It's relaxed. It's pleasant. It doesn't annoy or irritate in any way. And 0-60 in 9.6 seconds isn't to be sniffed at for a 7 seater 4x4.

It's also good to drive. Selecting Automatic 4WD sharpens up the front-end Audi quattro style. It feels a bit stiffer than a CR-V, without being any less comfortable. In any kind of inclement weather it's worth putting it into Auto 4WD, and only using 2WD for dry motorways, cities and suburbs.

The four-wheel drive system is straightforward. You can select 2WD, which gives front drive only, bringing rear drive into play in very extreme conditions, 4WD AUTO which brings rear drive in at a 70/30 split whenever needed to stabilise the vehicle, and 4WD LOCK which provides a lock to the centre diff distributing power 50/50 front and rear at low speed.

As Mitsubishi did with the Outlander, Peugeot sent us off road, through some muddy woods in the rain this time, and the car handled it very well. This is a ‘soft roader' that can do a bit of mild ‘off roading' if necessary.

If you had £22k to £25k to spend, needed 7 seats and had to choose between a 4007, a Santa Fe, a Captiva and an Antara, the 4007 is a much nicer car to drive on the road.

It's as good as a Captiva/Antara off road, but not as good as a Santa Fe.

There is no automatic option, as there is with the Santa Fe and Captiva/Antara.

And the 6th and 7th seats of the Santa Fe and Captiva/Antara are much better. Particularly good in the Captiva/Antara.

The on road driving experience of the 4007 is so very much better than the others, that would clinch it for me. But different people have different priorities, which is why I made these differences clear.

Engine MPG 0-62 CO2
2.2 HDi 39–40 mpg 9.9–11.0 s 185–194 g/km
2.2 HDi Automatic 39 mpg 12.5 s 189 g/km

Real MPG average for a Peugeot 4007 (2007 – 2012)

Real MPG was created following thousands of readers telling us that their cars could not match the official figures.

Real MPG gives real world data from drivers like you to show how much fuel a vehicle really uses.

Average performance

86%

Real MPG

27–41 mpg

MPGs submitted

28

Diesel or petrol? If you're unsure whether to go for a petrol or diesel (or even an electric model if it's available), then you need our Petrol or Diesel? calculator. It does the maths on petrols, diesels and electric cars to show which is best suited to you.

What have we been asked about the Peugeot 4007 (2007 – 2012)?

Every day we're asked hundreds of questions from car buyers and owners through Ask Honest John. Our team of experts, including the nation's favourite motoring agony uncle - Honest John himself - answer queries and conudrums ranging from what car to buy to how to care for it as an owner. If you could do with a spot of friendly advice before buying you're next car, get in touch and we'll do what we can to help.

Ask HJ

Do I have any recourse against Jaguar Land Rover for the EGR failure in my 2013 Evoque?

My 2013 Range Rover Evoque was in for a service a month ago. During the service they reported that there was a coolant leak. This was confirmed to be coming from the EGR cooler and this will require both the EGR and cooler replacing at a cost of £925. I have researched the issue on the internet and note that a significant number of JLR customers have reported issues across the range with EGR failures. I wrote to JLR to complain that this was a widespread issue and was surprised that this was not being covered on a recall. They have eventually responded and after going back and forth they have offered a gesture of goodwill of 50 per cent towards the cost as my vehicle was four years old and now out of warranty. My response was that this was a fault in manufacture and I shouldn't be having to pay for something that is clearly not a one off fail. They said they would review it again but have just come back with the same offer. A concern is that I could be looking at a similar bill in a few years time when the new parts fail again. Do I have any other course of action?
This is a PSA/Ford engine, not a JLR engine, and I have not seen a massive number of other complaints over other vehicles fitted with it. One previous report in the Evoque suggests that the problem may be the way it is installed in the car: http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/carbycar/land-rover/range-rover-evoque-2011/?section=good/ Only one report of an EGR failure in the Freelander II with the same engine: http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/carbycar/land-rover/freelander-2-2006/?section=good/ None reported in Discovery Sport, Outlander, 4007 or C Crosser with the same engine.
Answered by Honest John
More Questions

What do owners think?

Our view gives your our opinion, based on driving hundreds of cars every year, but you can't beat the views of someone who lives with a car day-in, day out.

  • 5 star 100%
  • 4 star
  • 3 star
  • 2 star
  • 1 star

See all owners' reviews