I bought a car 10 months ago that already needs the brake pads changed. Is this level of deterioration to be expected?

I bought the above car from a main dealer on 15 August 2020. They stated that a service and MOT had been done and it was ready to go. The car had 24,994 miles on the clock.
Last week, a warning light came on to check the brake pads. I took it to a local garage who told me that that the front needed pads and discs, plus wire, while the rear only needs new pads. I have done 3707 miles since the purchase. What state were they in when the MOT was done on 14 August 2020 and could this level of deterioration be expected within the mileage I have done? I would welcome your help in this matter. Regards.

Asked on 10 June 2021 by Calvin Clark

Answered by Dan Powell

If the car has been standing outside for long periods then yes, because the discs will have rusted and pitted and chewed through the pads. If the damage is general wear and tear (no disc corrosion) then the brakes may have been heavily worn when you bought the car. It would then be worth raising a complaint with the dealer.

Tags: brake discs brake pads

Similar questions

Can I claim new brake discs and pads under warranty?

I purchased a car in May 2021 that had been previously registered by the dealership in March 2021. The car went for its first service two weeks ago and they said the brake discs and pads needed to be...

Do I need matching brands of pads and discs when replacing brakes?

My Subaru Outback is in need of a braking overhaul. On their websites I can see pads and discs from Brembo, Pagid, and Delphi, but I can't find a supplier. One of the local garages will offer Delphi...

My brake discs and pads only lasted 24,000 miles. Is this acceptable wear and tear on a brand new car?

My 2019 Skoda Kodiaq is at 24,000 miles and I've had to replace both the front brake discs and pads, which I consider unacceptable wear. Before the Kodiaq, I owned (from new) an Octavia VRS estate for...