I know what the received wisdom is, but please just humour me for a sec.
I know that this doesn't seem to be a popular idea, but I'm just wondering why not.
The (probably silly) idea I had in my head was that, on a FWD car, one could use two "all-season" tyres on the rear of the car, and more specialist rubber on the front depending on the time of year.
Now I know that mixing summers and winters is a daft idea in winter due to the widely-differing responses of the tyres. But if an all-weather tyre is seen as being "half-way" betwixt one and t'other, what would be the problem with this approach?
The all-season tyre would be at least as good as a "budget" summer tyre in the summer at pretending to be a summer tyre, and at least as good as a "budget" winter tyre in the winter at pretending to be a winter tyre. So where exactly is the problem with this?
At the first sign that this is a *bad* idea I will forget all about it, and either go the "replace all four wheels" approach or buy the Kleber/Vredestein all-seasons etc that have been mentioned.
|