Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - oilrag
Cars receive `care` via rigid schedules, laid down by manufacturers. At the dawn of the Motor Trade, over 100 years ago this approach would not have seemed out of place in certain aspects of societies attitudes to the poor and vulnerable. Time moved on, but the Motor Trade seemingly stayed fixed in its rigidity of `care` of its products, while Human care became more `needs` focussed.

Let me try to explain my view, by contrasting a Human care plan.

If you were writing a clients needs assessment for social and medical care, need would be assessed and re-assessed regularly.

For Example, while receiving multi agency care at home, as an outcome, constant re-assessment would mean that the discoloured mark on a clients foot would be noticed and they would not remain sitting there being fed `meals on wheels` while their foot deteriorated with gangrene. The vulnerability would have been assessed, monitored and interventions attempted.

Now, I`m prompted to write this topic following the recent thread on rusty sumps on cars serviced by the trade. Pretty simple really for a Garage to do something about it, rather than just looking at it worsening every year until the owner is notified a new sump is required.

The same with brake pipes, just crying out for a smear of grease from the mechanic who has just serviced the brakes.
Perhaps instead its a certain seam underneath that always rusts on a given model and every one knows about it in the trade, but does nothing. It could get a splash of preventative with a brush, but never does.

It seems to me to demonstrate, what I would once have called `Benign Neglect`. The Garage is not directly harming the car, but is turning a blind eye to its actual `needs`.

How many owners would not pay for an extra few minutes, while on the ramp to have a sump brushed with preservative, lines, the odd seam?

It seems therefore, that you could in modern times, perceive car servicing schedules as encompassing elements of `benign neglect`.
Any thoughts?

oilrag

Edited by oilrag on 27/06/2008 at 09:11

Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - pmh
As a spin off from this, there could be a web opportunity for a site that that comprehensively lists by car, those items that are not covered by servicing schedules but result in significant bills later in the life of a vehicle.

Car by Car lists some known failure points, but I envisage a database driven site, producing detailed check lists that could be used in a preventative way. A good starting point would be input from MoT testers who reguarly see the effects of benign neglect. A typical example that comes to mind is on the Mk4 Fiesta, there is a 'mud trap' on the rigid rear brake pipes (next to bracket/flexible join). Well known point of failure unless kept clear. I am sure that a site such as this could produce 100s of example of similar preventative measures.

????

pmh
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - 659FBE
Well said. I agree totally with your sentiments, servicing a car according to its weaknesses and modifying service regimens according to conditions of actual use can substantially lengthen its life.

This is one of the reasons I do my own work. The dealer structure is neither set up nor staffed with the necessary expertise to do this. Their business model would not permit it and customers are being short-changed as a result.

If you can't do your own work, an interested and knowledgeable Independent is the next best choice.

659.
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - ForumNeedsModerating
I would suggest that for many garages, doing the eminently sensible & thoughtful things you describe Oilrag would be disastrous for their revenues. Cynical, of course - but why would they want to 'turn away' future business by doing preventative maintenance over & above the bare minimum (be that legally and/or manufacturer defined).

Generally, many businesses (in any field) work just within what denies their customers legal grounds to sue for negligence or other contraventions under the various supply of goods acts.
I'm fully prepared for this & expect this 'standard' to be applied when buying any good or service; your title is very apt, the 'benign' part though perhaps applies to the enterprises' enhanced bottom-line when operating a businees model just the 'right' side of neglect.
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - L'escargot
Now I`m prompted to write this topic following the recent thread on rusty sumps on
cars serviced by the trade. Pretty simple really for a Garage to do something about
it rather than just looking at it worsening every year until the owner is notified
a new sump is required.


If you're referring to my Focus's sump, that's not the way it was/is. I was advised that the sump was rusting badly and would eventually leak. I was further advised to keep an eye on it and that the tell-tale signs would be oil spots on the ground. What else could they have done? I certainly wouldn't have wanted them to do something to it without my prior authority. You get plenty of posts on this forum from people complaining that a garage has done (and charged them for) something they hadn't authorised. No, I'm completely satisfied with the garage's actions on this matter. Since then I've been down my inspection pit and had a close look at the sump and I've concluded there is now nothing that could be done to prolong its life. This is an informed opinion, from the knowledge and experience I gained in my 40-odd years career in automotive R&D.
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - retgwte
well sumps can be kept going longer by simply wiping them with grease or vaseline at service time, garage should not need your permission to do this, its a common sense precaution

however the garage trade in this country is dominated by the big company car fleets, and their managers who drive down servicing costs, these folk together with car owners who shop around for the cheapest service even amongst main dealers of the same marque force the garage to trim their costs back to the bare minimum to compete on price with the other garages

and of course the fleet purchasing dept rarely keeps their cars past 3 years so preventative measure to prolong car performance beyound those years is of no value to them

etc

Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - L'escargot
well sumps can be kept going longer by simply wiping them with grease or vaseline
at service time garage should not need your permission to do this ..........


I expect a garage to do what I've asked them to do ~ no more or no less. And that's the way it should be. I can but iterate that I am completely satisfied with the garage's actions on this matter.

Edited by L'escargot on 27/06/2008 at 11:09

Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - mike hannon
Nice one, Oilrag.
I guess some people still think - probably mistakenly - that they are paying someone to care for their car, rather than just carry out scheduled servicing items.
On the other hand, the trade has shot itself in the foot by raising people's suspicions as to its motives by playing the 'dodgy brake discs' card and the like too often, so that when a garage or dealer raises a genuine wear or safety issue with an owner the immediate response is to think they are simply on the make rather than showing a caring attitude.
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - yorkiebar
Im probably a little naive, but not living/working in major town/cities possibly has benefits?

This seems an ideal "plug" for a qulaity independant. Let him you know that you want your car looked after (not just serviced by the book) and no doubt the extra little care will be there!

As said before. main dealers look after new/nearly new cars with no/little regard to their long term life. At the prices they (have to) charge any additional work/care is expensive for people who probably dont require/need/want it so it is not done.

Independants are probably more likely to know you as a person and treat your possesion as an item of care ?

Not always true I accept, but possibly far more likely?
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - RichieW
We all know that most servicing, like everything else in this country, is not done up to a standard but down to a price. Dealers will try and get vehicles in and out asap. There's little or no room for doing anything extra other than the scheduled requirements.

I think its a case of do it yourself or as Yorkiebar says, go to an independant who are usually motivated to do a better job.
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - L'escargot
<< go
to an independant who are usually motivated to do a better job.


I've discussed thoroughness of work with the Service Manager of the Ford dealership I patronise, and without being prompted he said that he knew that if a customer wasn't happy with the work carried out then they were likely to go elsewhere in future. His policy, therefore, was to make sure that the work his team carried out was satisfactory and that customers were happy with the work.

You can't tar all franchised dealers with the same brush.

Edited by L'escargot on 27/06/2008 at 18:01

Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - MikeTorque
Interesting topic this one, a whole book could be written on this subject matter.
Sure it could be said there is benign neglect at work in some garages, there is also willful neglect and that is a much more serious issue.

Personally I consider it good practice for a garage to notify me of anything and everything it considers is of concern or may needs attention, Something along the lines of servicing/MOT amber alerts for tyres etc. is good practice to be shown on the documentation handed to the consumer after any work carried out by a garage, and the garage verbally goes over any issues raised.

The major problem is the vast majority of car owners/drivers out there don't have a clue about the mechanical/electrical aspects of their car, and when/if they are informed their reaction is often one of defensiveness, scepticism, and cost judgements. If it's going to cost them money then far too often they usually don't want to know.

The other problem is were a garage or mechanic chooses to do something to a car that is outside the specified service schedule, they then may inadvertently fall into liability issues even though their intentions were goodwill based, so why risk it. It's such a pity our society has become so money and litigation obsessed otherwise there would be a lot more goodwill about and a lot less hassle in life in general.

The way forward is for a garage to always inform a vehicle owner/driver of any additional work that needs to be done and what options there are to carry out that work. A rusty sump, for example, has a number of possible solutions and putting grease all over it out of goodwill may upset someone when they would have preferred a proper paint job or replacement instead.

Good communications between all concerned is the vital component that is so often missing or lacking and it is this area where we all can and need to contribute.
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - Roly93
I would say in more simple terms, but along the same theme, if the aviation world was like the motor trade, we would all have an airliner in our back gardens sooner or later !
There have been many instances in the US following their early de-regulation of airlines that some of this motor trade mentality has crept in, with fatal results unfortunately.
(Like the Air Alaska flight which crashed into the Pacific due to lack of grease on a control component, and a work order to replace this component being falsified by a line mechanic.)
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - MikeTorque
Too true Roly, I wouldn't fly a Typhoon if I didn't have confidence in the people around me. The quality of their work shames your average garage mechanic, even the tiniest of defects gets picked up and rectified, there is absolutely no room for errors.

Edited by MikeTorque on 27/06/2008 at 13:36

Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - Ian (Cape Town)
The quality of their work shames your average garage mechanic even the
tiniest of defects gets picked up and rectified there is absolutely no room for errors.


A few years back my BMW developed an annoying rattle from thr engine bay, shortly after being serviced by a 'reputable' dealership. Mods please explain? {see reply below}
I looked in the bay, and found, on one of the sills next to the front wheel well, a set of mole grips.
Lovely.
I went back to the clowns and asked
(a) If they've left a set of grips in there, what ELSE they left around;
and
(b) What the *pink fluffy dice - with respect to the mods* were they using mole grips on the engine for, anyways? Excuse the pun, but moles are the blunt instrument of engineering. What fitting/stud/bolt/nut of my engine had they stripped, which required them to use moles?

Edited by Dynamic Dave on 27/06/2008 at 19:54

Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - Mapmaker
Strange, but I thought that the thread would be more along the lines of:

Cars go out with a recommended cambelt change interval of 80k. Following a string of broken belts, this is reduced to 40k. But what about going the other way? Perhaps the belt is over-engineered - so why not lift it to 160k?



As for Ian's Mole Grips, point (b). What did they say in response? Nothing, I'll bet.
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - Ian (Cape Town)
As for Ian's Mole Grips point (b). What did they say in response? Nothing I'll
bet.

Grovelly apologies, actually, Mapmaker.

And a refund on the labour, but not on the parts. Understandable, really.

Also, I kept the grips - PROPER set as well, none of this made in Fong Kong rubbish, and I still have them!

The chap asked for them back, and I asked, slightly impolitely, in which orifice he would like them. (Obviously I didn't use those specific terms).


Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - DP
The vast majority of any service schedule is a list of checks. If the list is comprehensive, and the garage doing the work they are charging for, they should pick up early signs of work needing doing and advise the customer. If something is on a checklist for an x,000 mile service on a particular vehicle, and you pay for an x,000 mile service on that vehicle, failure to pick up an early stage failure on one of those items means the dealer hasn't done what you've paid them to do.

I have a little bit of sympathy for the dealers here though. If they ignore warning signs of work and the problem gets worse, they are blamed for not being thorough enough. If they say there's a problem that is going to need attention, they are often accused of inventing work for the sake of it. Look at the discussions we've had on here about brake pads for example.

There are also attentive and professional main dealers out there who treat cars as their own. Not as many as there should be, but they exist.

Cheers
DP

Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - steveo3002
100% agree with the orig poster

a dab of oil on a nut/bolt thats starting to rust, blob of waxoil on a underbody scrape , maybe some tape on some chafed wires etc

all goes make things easier in the long run
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - oilrag
"If you're referring to my Focus's sump,"

Hi L,Escargot, This thread was not intended to be focussed on your particular sump like that and I apologise if it seemed so. There was a thread (I did say thread in my OE post) about them and as we all know its a pretty common issue. Inspiration from there for this thread, yes, along with my past occupation as a contrast ;)

Sorry anyway, for any annoyance caused.

Regards

Edited by oilrag on 27/06/2008 at 18:42

Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - L'escargot
No probs, oilrag. I'm not at all annoyed. I do, however, feel that franchised dealers in general come in for a lot of unjustified criticism and get tarred with the same brush that is used on the few dealers which actually deserve the tarring. It just so happens that I like to give credit where credit is due.

Edited by L'escargot on 27/06/2008 at 18:52

Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - oilrag
Thanks for your generosity L,escargot.

I sometimes think i`m too verbose. ;)
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - BrianH2
Volvo 245 1989 360k Bi-fuel.
Having driven this car for 20 years from new, I now know how long pads, discs, water pumps and clutches last. Clutches are too heavy for me, so off to the main dealer (cant find an independent).
The clutch have change times of course, but as the gear box is out at an average of 175k, there are other things to do. So I request.......Please can you do the engine mounts, the clutch master, slave and tubes, the spigot bearing, main oil seal, centre prop-shaft bearing and seals, rear back axle oil seal. This was no problem with the satellite, now this is a timed clutch change....so they did run out of time for the day. Some of those items were not done, though I was pleased they picked up the gear box first motion shaft oil seal and this was replaced.
Although disappointed at the time, I should have known of these timed times.....................

'Sir you are only booked in for a clutch change.'

I booked a complimentary car but.......................

Recommended body shops are good, and pick up what needs to be done, but as above need good instructions.

ALWAYS ask for replaced parts back

Brianh
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - Dynamic Dave
Mods please explain?


www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?v=e&t=32...0
&
www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?v=e&t=32...8

ps, changed it, as per above reason.
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - Lud
It's true that a really ace indy will do things beneficial but not specifically requested, without charging much or indeed at all, if he has time. But so will a really ace main dealer workshop. I remember Eurocars at Marble Arch with great affection for their mustachioed French foreman, who always got my Dyane to run noticeably better just by doing the service properly.

I am afraid this thread reminds me of my own benign neglect of my own cars over the years, in the matters of brake fluid and coolant changes in particular but also checking gearbox oil levels and so on. And I have seldom changed brake pads before noticing poor braking or even hearing metal on metal. Of course I have taken better care of some cars than others.
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - Armitage Shanks {p}
Mike Torque The budget for servicing a Typhoon is almost unlimited and comes from taxpayers, not individual 'owners' who have to foot their own servicing bills! Not really comparing like with like IMO!

Edited by Armitage Shanks {p} on 27/06/2008 at 20:14

Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - Ian (Cape Town)
Servicing that Typhoon's Napier (Napier Bell?) must have been fun.
Sleeve valves, weren't they?
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - Lud
Sump full of mechanics' fingers...
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - Ian (Cape Town)
Better than bananas, Lud. And there are famouse tales of 2CVs traversing africa with a monkey-food gearbox...
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - Lud
I've never gone that far... but when I was younger and ate more I often used to think that a gearbox or back axle full of steak would start to smell strangely and mysteriously appetising for a while, perhaps some time before the unit failed definitively...
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - oilrag
Thread was intended to be more about the first and last paragraphs in my original post, schedules in changing times. Next time I`m going to leave the ham and cheese out of the sandwich, Why won`t anyone gnaw on the crusts for a while...

;);)
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - Lud
You ask in the op oilrag whether owners would be prepared to pay a bit extra for those dabs of waxoil, grease, underseal etc, in the known but hidden places as well as the obvious ones.

Owners would be willing to pay, in my opinion, if they valued their cars and meant to keep them. Not everyone does. Many here indeed would say it was lavishing money on some future owner who won't have to pay any extra for the car and may be a ghastly fellow as well.

Others just want to preserve machines in decent fashion. It's a matter of principle for them. I agree with their attitude but I don't behave like that myself. Perhaps I might under different circumstances, who knows?
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - oilrag
Agree Lud,
Especially about the "future owner"...
Bought 16 inch water pump pliers earlier today and like the look and feel of them. As SWMBO says, "there`s no hope" ;)

All the Best ;)
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - gordonbennet
I suppose we fall into two camps here, one the one hand some, including myself who treat our vehicles far too well and have an affectionate feel for them and know when something isn't right, possibly treating our vehicles as a friend to be shown care, courtesy and generosity.
From cleaning out any salt residue, to dabbing the old wax-hoyle around the brake pipes and anything else that looks a bit neglected, to over servicing of all mechanical parts, probably far too frequently. And to excessive care of the body.
Yes i am guilty of all those, i like to check my engine oil and and still find the oil translucent on my diesel, i swear the engine sounds sweeter after its had an oil change less than half the mileage recommended.
Its a pleasure to open a door thats had a drop of oil on the hinges and the locks and stays, to pull the greased bonnet cable, and to feel a smooth action instead of having to yank the thing out of the dashboard to try and bring the outer cable up enough to ping the bonnet.

The other camp treat their vehicles as a tool, to be given the minimul maintenance and care as stated bible like in the handbook.
Nothing wrong with that either, but the differences between us cause some posts here.

I wonder if the way we buy our vehicles has an influence on our care of them.
We bought the old MB some 6 years ago, really for swmbo, as she is a confident and very swift driver and loves unique things.
It was the car she fell in love with, and was searched out as having the colour combination she wanted, with a very low mileage, good history and 1 owner.
It was i suppose a present, and is cared for in the same way an antique might be.
The hilux was a different type of intended use obviously, but was researched and tested and is intended to possibly last many years, hence it too is babied.

If on the other hand a car was required by someone normal, (and i do know we are a bit potty), to cost x pounds and was reqd to last x years and be worth x pounds at reasale, then it would only be a tool and wouldn't possibly be such a heartfelt purchase.

I've waffled again, sorry. and my speelings have gone a bit awry..;)

Edited by gordonbennet on 27/06/2008 at 23:14

Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - MikeTorque
Mike Torque The budget for servicing a Typhoon is almost unlimited and comes from >> taxpayers, not individual 'owners' who have to foot their own servicing bills!
Not really comparing like with like IMO!


AS, "almost unlimited" - actually it's strictly controlled and monitored, unless something hits the fan then it's a new ball game !

I'm a tax payer like anyone else and I like to see everyones hard earned cash used efficiently and effectively. There are good quality mechanics out there going a good job in the motor trade, not because they are paid lots of cash but because they apply themselves and settle for nothing less than doing a first class job. It's the poor quality workers who skimp, cut corners and lie about the work they do (or don't do) that causes the profession to get dragged down far too often. It doesn't matter who is paying the bill, be it private or public, there is no excuse for poor quality and shoddy work on equipment that essentially saves a persons life, an excuse may cost someone their life.

When I have my car serviced I expect the work to be done to quality standards, and if something gets missed or isn't fixed properly I will then discuss it with the service people who then usually apologise and offer to rectify asap.
Car servicing schedules, `Benign Neglect`? - L'escargot
One big problem I see with allowing a garage to do unauthorised additional work at their discretion is them knowing where to draw the line as to what they ought to do. Also, some customers might applaud their conscientiousness whilst others would say they had taken liberties and exceeded their remit.

All in all I think it's far better if both customer and garage are clear on what work is to be done. Then there will be none of the arguments and bad feelings that is so often reported on this forum. Don't get me wrong, I'm all in favour of a garage advising a customer that additional work would be beneficial. But I'm adamant that the approval of the customer should be obtained beforehand.