Review: Volvo V50 (2004 – 2012)

Rating:

Classy-looking compact estate with very good ride comfort and tidy handling. A fine long-distance cruiser. The UK's most popular Volvo.

Not everyone gets on with the floating dashboard. Boy Racer packages like the expensive R pack not suited to Volvo clientele. Expensive problems with diesels more than three years old.

Recently Added To This Review

1 April 2018

Report of 2011 Volvo V50 SE Lux DrivE 1.6 diesel failing completely at about 120,000 miles. The engine seized and could not be restarted, and had to be transported to the local Volvo dealer in Havant... Read more

8 November 2017

Volvo S40 2.0D vehicle failed to start and and showed error message: TURN STEERING WHEEL and ATTEMPT RESTART. Owner thinks this is a sympton of a common ECU problem. Volvo dealer replaced steering... Read more

16 July 2016

Report of 2009 Volvo V50 D5 Sport indicating steering lock service required. Although the steering lock is not activating with the key removed and the steering is moving freely, the car will not start.... Read more

Volvo V50 (2004 – 2012): At A Glance

Last year I wrote a rave review of the new Volvo S40. It was the first time for a long time a car had exceeded all my expectations. That test covers the 170bhp and 220bhp 5- cylinder automatics, so if they are the engine and gearbox combinations you are interested in, you'd better read it after this.
Here I look at the new Ford/PSA 2.0 litre diesel version of the V50, which is anticipated to account for 50% of V50 sales, and the All Wheel Drive 220bhp V50 T5, which arrives later in the year.

There's no doubt it's a gorgeous looking car. Like the Audi A4 B6 Avant which is its most direct competitor, the V50 has even more eye appeal than the saloon. It's attractive from all angles; beautiful at the front, neat at the side and butch at the back.

Volvo V50 2004 Road Test

What does a Volvo V50 (2004 – 2012) cost?

Get a finance quote with CarMoney

What's the Volvo V50 (2004 – 2012) like to drive?

Most of the technical details are the same as the S40, so no point in repeating what's already in the S40 test. Significant differences are, of course, the luggage space and a bit more headroom in the back seat. This was the first time I had driven the 2.0 litre version of Ford/PSA's new 16 valve common rail all alloy diesel. (For the 1.6 version, coming in S40s but not V50s, see the Mazda 3 road test.) In the V50 and S40 it's mated to Ford's new 6-speed manual box with reverse up alongside first. It's not the same engine and gearbox as the X-Type Jaguar diesel which uses the Mondeo Duratec diesel and the earlier Mondeo 5-speed gearbox.

Volvo's test route for this car was almost all Spanish Autopista, which the company felt was its natural habitat. And there's no doubt it's a fine cruiser with an extremely tall sixth gear giving around 38mph per 1,000rpm, which means you're turning less than 2,000rpm at the absurdly low UK motorway limit. It's quite and smooth even at much higher speeds, and extremely punchy in 4th gear. But whether it will make a good caravan tower is a bit doubtful with that tall 6th gear because peak torque isn't developed until you're doing about 76mph, which is a bit quick with a bungalow behind.

As well as on motorways it's good on quick two lane A roads, with bags of grunt for overtaking quickly and safely. Ride comfort is very good indeed. And handling is fine. But get it onto a narrow B road or worse and, while it doesn't go to pieces, it simply stops being impressive. Nothing like as smooth and assured as the 5 cylinder petrol automatic S40s I drove last year. And in these conditions the electro hydraulic power steering felt more like Mazda's than the 5-cylinder S40's. Don't get me wrong. It's still a fine car. And preferable in handling, steering and power delivery to an Audi A4 TDI PD 130. So where the anti BMW 320d brigade previously only had one excellent alternative, they now have two and I can imagine endless test drives and poring over catalogues before user chooser company car decisions are finally made.

On to the V50 T5 AWD and that's a different animal altogether. The manual box is Volvo's own, as on the S60 and V70 T5, with reverse down beside 6th. To give clearance for the front to rear propshaft, the suspension is jacked up a bit with thicker anti roll bars to help compensate. The other advantage, of course, is a bit more clearance for driving on bumpy tracks.

This car puts its considerable power down very well and builds up speed extremely rapidly. The Haldex clutched four-wheel drive system does its job brilliantly and you're not aware of any unpleasant drivetrain whirrings. Push into a greasy corner too fast, though, and in spite of the sophisticated and unobtrusive DSTC system, you will ultimately experience understeer, as a couple of our colleagues discovered when they hit a diesel spillage and slid into the front wheel of an oncoming truck. I mention this because it proved to be an excellent test of the Volvo's crash safety system. In this glancing impact, only the side airbags were deployed, which is exactly what should have happened, and, despite the shock, neither driver not passenger were injured in the slightest. In normal circumstances, most drivers will never get near these limits, but it is comforting to know the car will look after you if the crunch ever comes.

Volvo also offered an opportunity to try the V50 T5 AWD automatic on a typical rough and hilly farm track. Precisely the sort of access road buyers of this sort of car buy it for. And it was fine, adroitly switching power to the wheels with the most traction and probably making it the best caravan or single horsebox tower in the range.

I'd better also mention that I drove to the airport in Ford's latest 2004 model Mondeo 2.5V6 6-speed manual Ghia X and before that drive had started to forget what a fine car Ford's Mondeo now is. Smooth, quick, surefooted and capable, it's easily as good as the lower powered 5-cylinder S40s. It simply lacks what Volvo call ‘form over function' appeal (it doesn't buy you the status of an S40 or V50).

But when the decision is between a V50 or the equivalent A4 Avant, it's a really hard one to make. The Volvo diesel definitely does nudge ahead of the A4 TDI PD 130. Whether the V5 T5 AWD beats the A4 3.0 Quattro is a much tougher call. All I can say is I'd be very happy indeed with either. And If I went for the Volvo I'd definitely find something to do with the £1,500 I'd save.

Engine MPG 0-62 CO2
1.6 39–40 mpg 12.0 s 169–171 g/km
1.6 D 57 mpg 12.1 s 132 g/km
1.6D DRIVe 63 mpg 11.5 s 119 g/km
1.6D DRIVe Start/Stop 72–74 mpg 11.5 s 99–104 g/km
1.8 39–39 mpg 11.0 s 172–174 g/km
1.8 FlexiFuel 38 mpg 11.0 s 177 g/km
2.0 37–38 mpg 9.6 s 176–177 g/km
2.0 D 49 mpg 9.6 s 153 g/km
2.4i 33 mpg 8.3 s 203 g/km
D2 66 mpg 11.5 s 114 g/km
D3 49–55 mpg 9.6–9.7 s 134–154 g/km
D3 Geartronic 49 mpg 9.7 s 154 g/km
D4 49–55 mpg 8.8–8.9 s 134–154 g/km
D4 Geartronic 49 mpg 8.9 s 154 g/km
D5 45 mpg 8.0 s 166 g/km
D5 Geartronic 45 mpg 8.0 s 166 g/km
T5 31–33 mpg 6.9–7.3 s 203–211 g/km

Real MPG average for a Volvo V50 (2004 – 2012)

Real MPG was created following thousands of readers telling us that their cars could not match the official figures.

Real MPG gives real world data from drivers like you to show how much fuel a vehicle really uses.

Average performance

84%

Real MPG

24–68 mpg

MPGs submitted

670

Diesel or petrol? If you're unsure whether to go for a petrol or diesel (or even an electric model if it's available), then you need our Petrol or Diesel? calculator. It does the maths on petrols, diesels and electric cars to show which is best suited to you.

What have we been asked about the Volvo V50 (2004 – 2012)?

Every day we're asked hundreds of questions from car buyers and owners through Ask Honest John. Our team of experts, including the nation's favourite motoring agony uncle - Honest John himself - answer queries and conudrums ranging from what car to buy to how to care for it as an owner. If you could do with a spot of friendly advice before buying you're next car, get in touch and we'll do what we can to help.

Ask HJ

I recently bought a faulty Volvo V50 - the dealer won't respond to me, so how can I reject the car?

I bought 2009 Volvo V50 on 11 November and it went to my Volvo garage for a service on 21 November. Pre-service showed numerous faults, some serious. I have contacted the trader asking for my money back with no reply. What is my next step as I am aware this is time-sensitive (within the 30-day rejection period)?
Formally reject the car by letter, outlining the reasons, sent to the trader by Post Office Special Delivery, telling him that you will be returning the car to him on a specific date within the 30 day period and that you want a full refund of everything you have paid him or you will sue. Take a copy of the letter and staple to it the Post Office Certificate of Posting so that becomes a matter of record. Assuming the cost of the car was less than £10,000, if the trader does not refund our money you can sue him for it using: https://www.gov.uk/make-court-claim-for-money
Answered by Honest John
More Questions

What do owners think?

Our view gives your our opinion, based on driving hundreds of cars every year, but you can't beat the views of someone who lives with a car day-in, day out.

  • 5 star 17%
  • 4 star 50%
  • 3 star 17%
  • 2 star
  • 1 star 17%

See all owners' reviews