Ask a Question

Is a turbo petrol or naturally-aspirated engine better when it comes to long term reliability?

I drive about 3000 miles a year and have always owned normally-aspirated petrol engines with torque-converter gearboxes. I'm wanting to buy a replacement but seem to have little option other than a turbo engine and/or a non-torque-converter gearbox. I've looked recently at a Ford Kuga which gives me a 1.5 petrol turbo engine and a torque-converter box and a Mercedes GLA which gives me a normally-aspirated petrol engine and a 7G-DTC gearbox. Leaving aside other differences, which of these configurations is likely to be most reliable during a 12-year-or-so ownership, please?

Asked on by

The big advantage of a petrol turbocharged engine is that the turbo shares its water cooling with the engine and, because the coolant is having to cool extremely hot exhaust gases rotating the turbo, the engine heats up much more quickly so is much more efficient on short runs from cold.
Similar questions
I'm looking to buy a used 4x4. We are likely to do a lot of short drives - because of this we're only considering petrol cars to avoid DPF issues and we already have a diesel for longer journeys. Our other...
Our 6 year old Jaguar XF Portfolio, which we like, is due for a change. Annual mileage is around 8000 - mostly short journeys, but 4/5 times a year 700 mile return trips. Main requirement is comfort on...
I currently have an almost six year old Honda Jazz 1.4 ES which I have had from new. It has been very reliable and I have been happy with it. I thought of replacing it with a new Jazz but noticed in one...

Ask Honest John

Value my car