Mercedes-Benz CLK (2002 - 2009)
.jpg?width=420&height=250&rmode=crop)
CLK 3.2
reviewed by Philip O'Connor on 30 July 2022
5
Overall rating
5
How it drives
5
Fuel economy
5
Tax/Insurance/Warranty costs
4
Cost of maintenance and repairs
4
Experience at the dealership
5
How practical it is
5
How you rate the manufacturer
5
Overall reliability
Reliable superb engine great cruiser and handles well
Owned since July 2010, car First Registered March 2005 well maintained with six month oil changes and annual service. Last service by Ex Mercedes mechanic in which he observed that this model and engine configuration and design is exceptional and utterly reliable. Now done 135,000 miles, Mechanic advised that you should keep for as long as possible. He even looked at the double chain Cam on last service and said it was in very good order and replaced supporting parts which kept the costs down.
If you can find one with a decent history and want a comfortable cruiser with a sweet engine this is your choice. A car that is easy on the eye and built to last.
reviewed by Chris Ads on 25 March 2022
reviewed by Prdro on 13 October 2021
reviewed by Anonymous on 30 June 2020
reviewed by Anonymous on 28 May 2020
reviewed by Anonymous on 22 August 2019
reviewed by Andrew A C Clark on 18 April 2018
reviewed by Anonymous on 31 October 2017
reviewed by Boon Tan on 3 May 2017
reviewed by GlassHalfHull on 6 November 2015
reviewed by ace35 on 1 May 2014
reviewed by dads army on 1 May 2014
reviewed by alastair kirk on 18 February 2014
reviewed by Doubledeclutcher on 23 January 2014
reviewed by locque on 30 August 2013
reviewed by CLK on 7 March 2012
reviewed by tescodirect on 7 September 2011
reviewed by Doubledeclutcher on 12 June 2011
reviewed by 098pierre on 14 December 2010
Write your review
About this car
| Price | £29,887–£68,923 |
|---|---|
| Road Tax | H–K |
| MPG | 19.3–44.1 mpg |
| Real MPG | 89.4% |
Just reviewed...
.jpg?width=205&height=140&rmode=crop)
.jpg?width=205&height=140&rmode=crop)
Elsewhere on 
.jpg)
