The Gov't doesn't decide what is safe - or not - in terms of a new vehicle type. Or at least, not directly. Those standards (and you're an engineer and, allegedly, a professional, so you should know about standards) are international, and have been well set up for a long time, and regularly get reviewed and modified.
So maybe the regulations are 'smothering'. They're also there to stop you from being dead or crippled in a 'normal' accident - hence why the number of road fatalities has dropped quite so dramatically over the last 2-3 decades, in spite of the roads being busier than ever.
To want to bypass all of those standard and, as I said, "bodge" something together that has no real crash protection - or none that has been tested to any real standards - smacks of idiocy. To then go on about your proficiency as an engineer, whilst still wanting to do the same - ignoring all good standards of workmanship and testing protocols - rather calls into question any such 'proficiency'.
As to paramotors being 'safe'. A few seconds worth of research found, on the BMJ (British Medical Journal) site, some accident statistics. Out of nearly 400 accidents, roughly 12% were fatal, 31% resulted in 'major' injuries, with the remainder being 'minor' injuries.
Think about that. You have an accident, 1 in 8 chance of being dead. 1 in 3 chance of 'major' injuries'.
Over 50% of the accidents involved pilots with considerable experience - 40+ flights or instructor level.
Over 70% of the accidents involved 'flat' terrain.
Finally, the number of paramotor accidents looks so low because so few people use them, compared to other types of transport.
My initial reply might have been excessively blunt. But your 'idea' really does look stupidly half-baked.
You've got to create and build an entirely new design, you've got to have somewhere to store it at home (and possibly at work), you've got to be able to repair and maintain it, you've got to ensure you don't breach any regulations (paramotors and restricted areas of airspace, for example), you've got to be adequately insured (if only for potential injuries or damage to other people or property). For a paramotor, you've got to have a restricted (to other people) area for take off and landing, you've got CAA issues ...
If it was so easy, then someone would have already done it and made a success of it. The fact that all the 'attempts' made on 'alternative transport', flying cars, the suchlike, so far have been utter failures, swallowing millions of pounds or other currencies, with nothing apart from a few prototypes or curiousities to show for it, says it all.
|