Is it worth it ? - No claim protection - Steveieb

I often wonder when renewing my insurance if it’s worth paying £100 for the privilidge of protecting my NCD.

Simply to be told on renewal that the cost has gone up because I had an accident.

What is the truth ? Is this worth having or another extra you can do without

Is it worth it ? - No claim protection - Orb>>.

It c#protects the percentage of NCD but not the premium.

I have never protected my NCD and the money I have saved would pay a several years premiums...

Is it worth it ? - No claim protection - Bromptonaut

Pretty much the same answer as Orb. I've had a couple of at fault claims in the last 10 years including a Roomster that was written off.

While I'd have paid a lot more remaining with the company that paid out - IIRC LV - I got a much cheaper quote from Direct Line; less than I was paying before the write off.

Is it worth it ? - No claim protection - gordonbennet

Is it as much as £100, to be honest i haven't done a quote without protected cover but will make a point of checking how much would be saved by unclicking the option next time.

I'm saying nothing about whether i've needed it or not, fate is a fickle thing so schtum it is.

Is it worth it ? - No claim protection - galileo

Pretty much the same answer as Orb. I've had a couple of at fault claims in the last 10 years including a Roomster that was written off.

While I'd have paid a lot more remaining with the company that paid out - IIRC LV - I got a much cheaper quote from Direct Line; less than I was paying before the write off.

I heard that Direct Line is being taken over by Aviva, so probably will align with Aviva's practices if the brand remains live.

Is it worth it ? - No claim protection - gordonbennet

I heard that Direct Line is being taken over by Aviva, so probably will align with Aviva's practices if the brand remains live.

That is not welcome news.

Is it worth it ? - No claim protection - Engineer Andy

Pretty much the same answer as Orb. I've had a couple of at fault claims in the last 10 years including a Roomster that was written off.

While I'd have paid a lot more remaining with the company that paid out - IIRC LV - I got a much cheaper quote from Direct Line; less than I was paying before the write off.

For higher risk age categories, the difference between say a 5 year NCD and 0 is enormous. For those living in a low risk area, working in a low-risk career and in that 'sweet spot' age-wise, all other things being equal, the starting premium can be lower than the premium for one with a higher risk profile but 5+ years of NCD, even unprotected.

Essentially there's no one 'rule' as to what works best, but a combination of factors and how each insurer ranks them to how they calculate the starting premium and level of NCD or how much a protected bonus costs.

The firm's customer base and type of vehicles they prefer to cover will also affect the premium, as will what other business they do - other types of insurance, including in commerce, and other unrelated business.

Some will cross-subsidise profits from one part of their business during 'unusual times' to keep another part going, like when insurers do this when some big payout comes for some huge liability.

I personally don't pay that much to get a PNCD, mostly about £30 - $50pa on my policies over the last 15-20 years, where the overall premium varied between about £400 when I first bought my car (new) back in 2006 when I was in my 30s and now only £180 ish when in my 50s.

I've only had one fault claim, and on my previous car back in 1999, and I had PNCD at that time. My premiums did steadily rise from about £350 to £650 over the next 4 years, but then reduced back down to where it started as I hit 30, with the premium only going up because my current car was higher spec / performance than the previous one.

I would also note that moving home to a more rural, lower crime area helped reduce my premium by about a third.