Sergeant Pepper

I have recently acquired a new KIA Picanto 1 and a very accomplished little car it is too. Naturally, the engine will need to go through it's ‘break in’ (as the manual puts it). Also, I would not expect to achieve the official combined mpg figure 67.3 anyway, as I don't use my cars for driving in a laboratory. However, I certainly did not expect to get a mere 47.91mpg either. (Duly entered into the Real Life Fuel Economy Register on your website.)

This is less than the urban figure, when I'm doing over twenty miles on the motorway every working day. Over 5 years of measurements, my previous car achieved 95% of the official combined mpg (I don't spend my evenings doing doughnuts in Tesco's car park), and yet in its first week the Picanto has returned only 71%. In your opinion is this indicative of a serious fault with the vehicle, or just the owner?

Asked on 15 August 2011 by TS, Lancashire.

Answered by Honest John
There is a serious fault with the way the official figures are measured because cars are tested running in a manner they cannot run in real life. That's why we established the Real Life Fuel Economy Register at www.honestjohn.co.uk/realmpg
Tags: real mpg
Similar questions
My wife has a Vauxhall Meriva 1.6 Club which is three years old in August and has done about 15,000 miles. It cost just under £9000 new as it was the last of the old models. I am considering replacing...
I recently bought a secondhand 2009 Insignia 2.0 CDTI SE to replace my 2001 Toyota Avensis 1.8 VVTI. I hoped to improve fuel economy with my change in car. The Insignia, which is a diesel, has only just...
I am looking to purchase a 3-4 year old car. What is the best petrol vehicle that provides 55 miles to the gallon?
Related models
Excellent small car for the money. High quality and neatly designed interior. Great to drive and cheap to run.
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer