Quantcast
Do you know your car's MoT and mileage history? Our user profiles will show you for FREE | No thanks

Skoda Reviews

New Cars
Good: Small car based on Volkswagen Up. Ideal for town. Economical and cheap to run. Fun to drive. Lower prices than Up and SEAT Mii.
Bad: Cheapest versions not under 100g/km CO2. High incidence of gearbox and clutch failures lost it a star. Timing belts need replacing at 3 years or 30k miles.
Good: Practical cabin with an impressively spacious boot, DAB radio and Bluetooth as standard, comfortable and easy to drive.
Bad: Base model doesn't have air con or alloy wheels.
Good: Solid build quality. Impressive interior space. Good range of small and frugal engines. Composed ride and handling.
Bad: Basic 1.0-litre engine can struggle with a full load on board. Twin boot floor is optional. Materials could be more tactile. Hardly exciting
Good: Effectively a replacement for the Yeti but with more space. Promises to be affordable to run. Similar to SEAT Ateca.
Bad: Not arriving until late in 2017.
Good: Very quiet, comfortable and easy to drive. Practical, spacious cabin. Good value for money.
Bad: Some of the best technology is only standard in top models. Seven seats not standard on lower trim levels.
Good: Saloon shape but actually a practical hatchback. Far superior interior quality than outgoing model. Very practical with a large boot. Feels solid.
Bad: Comfortable but not exciting to drive.
Good: Roomy. More load space than the old car. Flexible and practical. Haldex clutched 4WD Scout version.
Bad: More expensive than before.
Good: Practical and refined performance version of latest Octavia. Available with excellent TSI engine or more economical TDI unit. Handling much improved over the standard car.
Bad: Top vRS 230 gets more equipment but a considerable firmer ride.
Good: Looks like a saloon but is actually a hatch. Sits between the Fabia and Octavia. Good value for money. Very practical and spacious.
Bad: Some interior materials aren't great. No engines have emissions of below 110g/km. Early models criticised for poor ride quality.
Good: Spacious and practical. Comes with an efficient range of engines. Represents good value for money
Bad: Entry-level models aren't generously equipped. A little on the dull side. Cabin materials could be nicer
Good: Upmarket hatchback that offers excellent value for money. Acres of legroom and bootspace. Efficient range of engines.
Bad: Driving experience is more functional than fun. Suspension can feel a little unsettled on rough roads.
Good: Pretty much near perfect as a practical family estate car. Great value for money. Comfortable and quiet on the move. Huge amounts of rear legroom.
Bad: DSG automatic can sometimes lack quick response and be hesitant.
Used Cars
Concept Cars
 

Ask Honest John

Value my car

Amount to borrow
Sorry. The minimum loan amount is £1000
To pay back over

My credit score

Best available rate 9.20%

Total repayment £9,304.93

Total cost of credit £1,804.93

£155.08

60 monthly payments

Apply now

Representative example

The Representative APR is 13.2% (fixed) so if you borrow £7,500 over 4 years at a rate of 13.2% p.a (fixed) you will repay £199.21 per month and repay £9562.20 in total.