Nissan Juke (2010 - 2019)

4
reviewed by Mrs B C Smith on 14 January 2024
5
reviewed by Trevor Bean on 18 May 2021
5
reviewed by Robin Merritt on 20 January 2021
4
reviewed by Ian Corley on 11 January 2021
5
reviewed by Anonymous on 4 January 2021
1
reviewed by alun crockford on 19 November 2020
2
reviewed by MONIIXS on 16 September 2020
2
reviewed by Anonymous on 15 July 2020
5
reviewed by Anonymous on 15 July 2019
3
reviewed by Anonymous on 20 June 2019
3
reviewed by Anonymous on 11 August 2018
3
reviewed by Alan Peebles on 8 August 2018
2
reviewed by Anonymous on 24 April 2018
5
reviewed by Thomas Walton on 12 November 2017
1
reviewed by Anonymous on 11 November 2017
5
reviewed by Anonymous on 2 November 2017
4
reviewed by benson1 on 21 September 2017
5

1.5 dCi 110 Tekna Stop/Start 5dr Hatchback

reviewed by Miniman777 on 28 October 2016
5
Overall rating
5
How it drives
3
Fuel economy
5
Tax/Insurance/Warranty costs
5
Cost of maintenance and repairs
4
How practical it is
5
How you rate the manufacturer
5
Overall reliability

Great to drive, good equipment levels - more than happy.

Chosen as a new company car, my other options were a Kia Ceed, Hyundai ix30, Renault Megane, Seat Leon, etc. Could have had an entry level Qasquai, but I felt a top spec Juke would frustrate me less because of the good equipment levels.
It’s worth pointing out that some of the negative points in the car-by-car review (boot space) don’t apply to 2014 models onward, which should be in a separate category.
That said, the Tekna is very well equipped, keyless entry/start, heated leather seats, sat nav, DAB, reversing camera, full bluetooth iPhone/music integration, four electric windows, etc.
Many see the Juke as a ‘marmite’ car (love or hate), but there is a certain funkiness in its styling. Another plus point for Juke’s from 2014 is that Nissan has substantially improved the boot space and had a slight restyle to the grille and back end, so you can identify the older and newer ranges.
Having had an 4x4 SUV before, I like the higher driving style, and the maximum seat height of the Juke is only a few cms lower than my previous SUV. The seats are comfortable and supporting, and after a 100+ mile journey there were no aches.
I have to admit to initial reservations about the power from the sixth generation of the Renault 1.5 110hp diesel unit compared to a 2.0 163hp Ford powered car I’d driven before, but the Juke is surprisingly nippy and has not left me wanting in respect of acceleration for overtaking or its ability to maintain pace. Power is delivered in a smooth manner – even more so now it’s run in - and there's a bit more pep in sport mode. As for MPG, the jury is still out as I’ve not broken the 60mpg barrier yet, but with a couple of thousand miles on the clock, it’s still tight.
Niggles? Very very few, but specifically the silly position of the heated seat switches under the armrest which means raising/lowering of arm rest and the position of the mirror adjustment control. Overall, I’m more than pleased with my choice and a plus point is no squeeks or rattles.

UPDATE: I’ve had the Juke for exactly a year, so a review of my experiences would be apt.

With 23,500 miles on the clock, the car has been utterly reliable. No faults, breakdowns or failures. It’s had once scheduled service in that time, and prior to that underwent a Nissan recall for mods related to emissions which amounted to replacing the DPF and revised engine management software.

The engine has loosened up nicely, oil consumption has been around one litre per 15,000 miles, and the mpg has settled at around 60. I also prefer to run the car in
‘sport’ mode, which suits me when swapping to and from the partner’s Cooper S.

Still can’t fault the comfort especially on long journeys, the keyless entry is a boon, and now it’s getting colder, the heated seats are wonderful.

So what am I less happy with? A bit more boot space would be nice, but now the dark nights are here again, it’s a shame the car come with xenon headlights as they can struggle on the country roads, so I am looking at replacement high intensity bulbs.

Finally, tyre wear. The Continenal Sport Contact 5s have been very good indeed, their B grade wet rating justified, and as of today, the fronts have 3-4 mm of tread left and will be replace in the next few weeks. The rears have 5 mm, so overall for my style of driving over fast A roads/Motorways and country roads with hard braking shows a very acceptable level of wear.

Report as offensive

4
reviewed by BN10 on 27 April 2016
3
reviewed by Happy Blue! on 19 October 2014
5
reviewed by sarcelle on 28 August 2014
4
reviewed by jovacastle on 27 August 2014
3
reviewed by Daz3467 on 2 June 2014
5
reviewed by Jukeman_Stez on 22 April 2014
2
reviewed by ClaireEll on 27 March 2014
4
reviewed by Anonymous on 2 January 2014
5
reviewed by ivanches on 25 January 2011
5
reviewed by usap on 19 January 2011

Write your review

About this car

Price£13,200–£26,030
Road TaxB–H
MPG37.2–70.6 mpg
Real MPG79.5%

Just reviewed...

5
submitted by J N HATT
4
submitted by Anonymous
5
submitted by GARY LIDDER
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer