Suzuki Swift (2010 - 2017)
reviewed by Anonymous on 2 September 2023
reviewed by Anonymous on 7 March 2023
reviewed by Comical Engineer on 25 March 2020
reviewed by CHIRAG PATEL on 6 August 2019
reviewed by Anonymous on 28 September 2018
reviewed by Stephen Tindall on 24 November 2017
reviewed by Comical Engineer on 27 July 2017
reviewed by Comical Engineer on 12 January 2017
reviewed by Dabooka on 12 October 2016
reviewed by alw on 2 July 2016
reviewed by Anonymous on 7 April 2016
reviewed by GranTurismo on 25 October 2015
reviewed by gravy on 7 September 2015
reviewed by sweden on 14 June 2015
reviewed by Andy43 on 16 October 2014
reviewed by gliaviate on 1 May 2014
reviewed by Anonymous on 13 January 2014
reviewed by Orangezorki on 6 January 2013
reviewed by Halmer on 11 February 2012
reviewed by stebe on 24 July 2011
.jpg?width=420&height=250&rmode=crop)
GLX 1.5
reviewed by Biffer on 14 February 2011
4
Overall rating
5
How it drives
4
Fuel economy
3
Tax/Insurance/Warranty costs
3
Cost of maintenance and repairs
5
Experience at the dealership
3
How practical it is
4
How you rate the manufacturer
5
Overall reliability
Neat, compact, easy to drive
Had the car for nearly three years now and have had no problems. It is relatively roomy, provided you are not over 6ft 4in. and comfortable. Has the necessary extras-i.e. air con, stereo, heated mirrow, and pretty good all round vision. The one occasional drawback is the 'small' boot, which is split in two (a top and bottom section) but this can easily be made into one by removing the floor shelf. However, you would be hard pushed to load two medium/large suitcases in. Petrol consumption has been 40 mpg, according to the computer read out. I am due to change this and want a slightly larger vehicle and would probably go for the Suzuki SZ4 after viewing your video.
Write your review
About this car
| Price | £9,243–£15,143 |
|---|---|
| Road Tax | A–F |
| MPG | 44.1–72.4 mpg |
| Real MPG | 89.6% |
.jpg)
