Fiat Panda (2004 - 2012)

4
reviewed by Big John on 20 February 2023
4
reviewed by Anonymous on 22 February 2020
4
reviewed by P W JAGGARD on 7 February 2017
5
reviewed by RENPANDA on 1 November 2015
5
reviewed by MondeoMonkeyMagic on 24 August 2015
5
reviewed by Anonymous on 13 August 2015
3
reviewed by RevRog on 14 July 2014
4
reviewed by maryandbuzz1 on 11 June 2014
5
reviewed by panda 2008 on 23 January 2014
4
reviewed by fudgepanda on 5 December 2013
1

1.1 Active 8v 5dr Hatchback

reviewed by lowflyingpilot on 5 November 2013
1
Overall rating
1
How it drives
3
Fuel economy
2
How practical it is
4
How you rate the manufacturer

A let down. Scary handling at the limits, windscreen arch A pillar obscures vision, in a dangerous way.

I used this car for my time on Lanzarote. I deliberately selected it because I run classic Citroen cars (XM, GS, DS (the original) & have had classic Fiat cars in my personal collection.

Fiats historically have been good handling, zippy cars. With great regret the (new shape) Fiat Panda is a let down on many fronts. I thought I would love this car.

At the limits the handling became scary. Completely the opposite of my 1990 Fiat Uno which is a handling joy and stable on the limit of grip. I have considerable car experience. This was one car that left me wondering what was going to happen on the limit of grip.

The other major disadvantage that I noticed, particularly on the twisting narrow roads of Lanzarote...is the fact that the windscreen A pillar blocks ones vision around the curves in the road. This left me waving my head around inside the car in an attempt to see what was around the twisting country lanes. Simply put the pillar architecture is terrible and in the wrong position. I have never noticed this much vision interference on any car. It also obscured the low walls found on Lanzarote mountain roads; leaving me wondering how close I was to the edge!

In 'normal' straight road driving you may not notice this windscreen pillar issue so much. But think of kids and bikes in city driving, and I think this 'city car' leaves much to be desired.

These factors really let the car down for me.

Coupled with this the door lock was in the drivers door only. In tight parking on tiny streets when the drivers door was against a wall, (meaning I had to move across the car to get out the passenger door), presented me with a locking car problem!

I felt like I was circus act trying to push my arm between the car and the wall to try and lock and unlock the car.

My opinion is they are a let down for Fiat. Legendary historic Fiat handling and practicality has been lost in this car. They are not as good as they appear to be.

I handed this car back, and got another Fiat Uno again for myself. A 23 year old 1990 Fiat Uno, that is more practical and does return 58 miles per gallon when not pushed all the time for performance, and is a far better car to use than the new model Fiat Pandas.

Report as offensive

2
reviewed by Anonymous on 25 August 2013
1
reviewed by NBLondon on 14 February 2011
5
reviewed by Pong on 7 January 2011
5
reviewed by LST524 on 14 November 2010
5
reviewed by LindaS on 9 September 2010
4
reviewed by luvvie on 28 June 2010

Write your review

About this car

Price£6,860–£12,285
Road TaxB–G
MPG43.5–67.3 mpg
Real MPG92.1%

Just reviewed...

4
submitted by Anonymous
4
submitted by Anonymous
5
submitted by Anonymous
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer