My premium increased after a no fault claim - should the at fault insurer cover this cost?

Last December, my son's neighbour reversed into my car, which was parked across the road from him. My car was repaired by the neighbour's insurer after he admitted full responsibility, and I approached and dealt with them directly. However, now I've come to renew my car insurance, I've discovered I'm being penalised by as much as 40 per cent. Other insurers are no longer prepared to insure me on the basis that I'm now a bigger risk, yet my son had been parking in the same place for nearly three years without incident. The neighbour's insurer says that they are not liable for my increased premiums, but the increased premium seem to me to be a direct expense as a result of the accident - so his insurer should be responsible for reimbursing me. Please advise.

Asked on 16 October 2017 by Stephen McCorrie

Answered by Honest John
Yes, the at fault insurer are liable for your direct losses as a result of their client's negligence. Appoint a solicitor, or if you have legal expense cover, contact them. You would need to claim back under a special damages claim. I would be claiming the increase for the next five years.
Similar questions
Someone has reversed into my daughter's car while she was stationary in car park. It caused £300 of damage to her car. We have notified her insurer, who are processing it as a no-fault claim. However,...
My daughter recently notified her insurer, Hastings Direct, of her change of address for the remaining three months of her insurance policy. She then received a confirmation message from Hastings, followed...
My car was badly damaged all along its offside while it was correctly parked on the public highway. I was at a meeting some 200 yards away, when I returned the driver responsible had left a note on my...
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer