Road closures are sometimes necessary in the aftermath of a road accident.

I am a retired Metropolitan Police Traffic constable. I was for some time attached to the investigation unit. Whilst I agree that 100 per cent of fatal accidents cannot be accurately reconstructed, nearly all can. Evidence is always left at the scene in some form or another, allowing one to reconstruct the speed and direction of vehicles, pedestrians etc. It would be a serious neglect of duty if police did not investigate every sudden or violent death, which must be presumed criminal until proved otherwise. I will however agree with you that it not always necessary to completely close roads, providing the scene and personal are protected from passing traffic. In my day, we were in charge of the streets, but this did not mean that we demonised drivers.

Asked on 14 October 2010 by IW, Petts Wood

Answered by Honest John
A fair and reasonable attitude, which is all the public asks of its police.
Similar questions
My daughter, a bicycle courier, was knocked off her bike while working. The driver who ran into her admitted liability, but doesn't want to go through his insurance. He has offered to give her the equivalent...
I was in a serious collision, which left me with head injuries and loss of memory. I was given the details of the other party involved by the police, which I forwarded to my insurer - Esure. They now want...
My daughter had her car damaged while it was parked outside her place of work. This was reported to her by two witnesses because the car drove off without leaving any details. The witnesses took the car's...
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer