I don't think it helped that many car buyers were duped into buying cars that were not suited to their usage patterns, e.g. diesels or high-performance cars (Mazda RX-8 being the obvious example) for short journeys, which then break down because of such issues.
I've found that quite often a medium-large sized car such as the Octavia would be better suited to a larger engine for out-of-town driving, as the famed "extra mpg" of the new small-sized TSIs just doesn't materialise because you have to thrash them to get them going.
Same applies to the "eco-X" cars - they're so underpowered that you have to cane them just to make progress under ordinary driving conditions: not 67mpg combined, more like 50mpg max. Don't forget that a larger engine that doesn't have to be stressed as much (not laboured though) will almost certainly last longer than a small engine that does. All the extra mpg £savings (not as much as is stated though) is eaten up by having to replace parts or the car itself at an earlier stage, and I'd rather have a car that makes smooth progress than one where I feel like I'm having to race it.
I think that's a huge sweeping generalisation. I am no VAG fan but I have driven dozens (literally) of TFSI engined cars in the last year or so - hire fleets are full of them all over Europe. I am always startled at how good the 1.2 105bhp (especially) is and how well it powers a Golf. Far from being thirsty and having to be thrashed they go exceedingly well and seem to return between 6 and 7 per 100km fuel economy (guess that's around 45mpg) in most conditions. Very refined too though Skodas seem to have a kettle-like whistle that you can't hear in VW and Audi installations - guess that's saving money on sound deadening.
The 1.4 125bhp is also great but I have limited experience in a couple of Audis only.
I've lots of experience of the TwinAir FIAT engine too in a 500C and get 50mpg without trying, nearer 60mpg if I try.
|