Bangernomics - The down side - dxp55
Met a mate yesterday who had bought a very nice looking X type Jag about three months ago - Y reg 3.0ltr Sport 98k for £2.500 -- very nice car - He turned up yesterday in borrowed car - seems the Auto box won't select or keep a gear - they think it's a solenoid in box but not sure - He is gutted. -- at least it is easy to get box out as it's RWD (yea) ;-))
Bangernomics - The down side - Clk Sec
With many years of bangernomics under my belt, I can't really think of an upside.

Clk Sec
Bangernomics - The down side - Cliff Pope
Bangernomics is about buying cheap reliable cars. That doesn't include:

1) paying £2500
2) Jaguars
3) automatics

Bangernomics is buying a Volvo 240 for £100 three years ago, and still using it reliably every day.
Bangernomics - The down side - oilrag
Happy relaxed bangernomics is being able to comfortably afford a brand new car paying cash. But instead choose to spend £300 on a banger.

allegedly ;)

Edited by oilrag on 24/11/2008 at 10:06

Bangernomics - The down side - Dr_Duffy
Luxury cars depreciate heavily for a reason. They have lots of complicated equipment on them that can go wrong. When they do go wrong its usually expensive to fix and very often there are not many places that know how to fix it, so you have to pay what they ask.
If you are going to buy older cars then buy something that is relatively simple and with an established reputation for reliability. Jaguars are by no stretch of the imagination a reliable car. I bought one brand new in 2000. Big mistake! I was soon on first name terms with my dealer's service manager. I sold the car after only one year. I really feel for the poor devil who's got it now, it wasn't a reliable car when brand new. It may have been scrapped though!
Bangernomics - The down side - oldnotbold
"Bangernomics is about buying cheap reliable cars. That doesn't include:

1) paying £2500
2) Jaguars
3) automatics"

Seconded.

Fools, money, parted, - complete to make a well known phrase or saying.
Bangernomics - The down side - mike hannon
>Bangernomics is about buying cheap reliable cars. That doesn't include:
1) paying £2500
2) Jaguars
3) automatics<

Seconded. Paying 2.5k for a reasonably young Jaguar might seem clever for a minute or two but has nothing to do with bangernomics.
Bangernomics - The down side - OldSock
1) paying £2500
2) Jaguars
3) automatics



I'd agree with the first two, Cliff, but not necessarily with the third.

My 'bangernomics' steed is a W124 280E, and the auto box still shifts seamlessly at 160k. A clutch change on many an older car can easily cost more than its value if paying someone else to do it.

I believe that effective 'bangernomics' calls for a certain level of competence with the spanners :-)

Edited by OldSock on 24/11/2008 at 11:07

Bangernomics - The down side - pyruse
£2500 is definitely not banger territory.
The point of bangernomics is that if you only pay a few hundred pounds for a car, you can throw it away of something expensive goes wrong.
So points 2 and 3 are irrelevant. If he'd bought the Jag for £250, he would scrap it and buy something else and not be gutted.
Automatics certainly aren't inherently less reliable than manuals.
Bangernomics - The down side - OldSock
This notion of 'scrapping it when it goes wrong' can be hard to quantify.

Would you scrap a £500 car because a numberplate lamp failed?

Because the water pump failed?

Because the clutch needed changing?

The higher the (repair cost)/(car value) ratio becomes, the easier it ought to be to make the decision to move on.

Unfortunately, our old 'bangers' can worm their way into our affections, making it much harder to part company with them when 'the time comes'!
Bangernomics - The down side - GJD
Would you scrap a £500 car because a numberplate lamp failed?


No
Because the water pump failed?


Maybe
Because the clutch needed changing?


Probably
Unfortunately our old 'bangers' can worm their way into our affections


They can't half worm their way back out again PDQ when the rate of expense ramps up.
Bangernomics - The down side - FotheringtonThomas
If to him a £2,500 car is "bangernomics", and it's gone wrong, he should simply scrap it - just as the person who's bought a car for £250 will. If £2,500 isn't a throwaway sum of money, it's not bangernomics! Simple as that.
Bangernomics - The down side - Mapmaker
Bangernomics is about buying cheap old cars cheaply, and throwing them away when something expensive goes wrong - which 9 times out of ten doesn't happen for 2/3 years.


It is not about paying nearly £2,000 above book for a car. Glass's gives the following (trade) valuations for a 4WD car 2 years younger than your mate's. Can't find an older one with a 3.0 engine, but whatever can't be bothered looking.

Jaguar X-TYPE SE 3.0 Petrol 4-door Saloon 5 Speed Manual Four Wheel Drive
Year: 2001 51 Mileage: 98,000

Excellent condition: £1535; Average condition: £1380; Below average condition: £1215

If he'd paid £800 for it, which is probably about what it is worth (running!), then he'd put it on eBay and get £500 for it and get a new one. £300 for 3 months' driving a nearly-new Jag = bangernomics. If he hadn't overpaid in the first place, he'd be laughing; it's exactly what bangernomics is about, you take the rough with the smooth, and this would have been a bit rough.
Bangernomics - The down side - Rattle
If I spent £1000 on a car I would want to get at least four years out of it, I would expect bills to be all servicing and plus an unexpected fault.

My dad paid £850 for his banger, 15 months and 13k later its still going strong (its all city milleage) it has its faults but it is safe and reliable and has luxeries such as quickcleaer and an electric drivers seat.

£2500 is not a banger!, it is a long term investment, unless you're rich.
Bangernomics - The down side - pd
That Glass's value looks a bit odd to me. CAP put a 51-reg 3.0 V6 SE Auto with 98 @ £2500 trade and they're not normally that far apart.
Bangernomics - The down side - oldnotbold
"£2500 is not a banger!, it is a long term investment, unless you're rich. "

£2500 is about as a horrible amount as you can spend. Too much to throw it away if the bills get huge, and no more chance of getting a good 'un than if you spend £500.

If you want cheap motoring you spend £500, and expect to replace it every two years, or you could spend £5,000 and keep it for a decent length of time and maintain it properly. We have one of each, and SWMBO's £5k Focus is starting to look like a bargain.
Bangernomics - The down side - Rattle
Oldnotbold I completly agree with you. I had a budget of upto £1500 to spend on a car, I ended u spending £350. I knew I had would have to get niggles fixed [in the garage as I speak] with my car but it is all fairly cheap.

If I spent £1500 on a car I am sure I would have the same problems and also would be worried about cambelts and the rest of it.

For this reason I think all my cars will be either be nearly new/new or very cheap and old.

I never want a car that suddenly snaps a camshaft at 5 years old, I have a very tight budget and could never be able to afford £800 for an engine rebuild. On a £350 it dosn't matter too much.

Edited by Rattle on 24/11/2008 at 13:15

Bangernomics - The down side - Mapmaker
If I spent £1000 on a car I would want to get at least four
years out of it I would expect bills to be all servicing and plus an
unexpected fault.


If you expect bills to be servicing and unexpected faults, then that's car ownership, isn't it?

I'd cheerfully spend £1,000 on a car and be prepared to bin it after a couple of weeks for a major failure. My motoring over the last 8 years owes me nothing whatsoever.
£2500 is not a banger! it is a long term investment unless you're rich.


No. A 2.5k Jag is a money pit. The most dangerous way known to man to blow 2.5k...
Bangernomics - The down side - dxp55
Oh well - glad it wasn't me then -- I will have to call it Dopernomics - And I see petrol is down to .89p - Can now get the barge out again.
Bangernomics - The down side - Andrew-T
>And I see petrol is down to .89p - Can now get the barge out again.

Funny how things change ... it's not long since people were complaining about petrol at this price :-)
Bangernomics - The down side - DP
I tend to spend £2.5k for my commuter cars, banking on getting 2.5 - 3yrs / 40-50k worth of reliable use out of them before getting what I can for them and moving on. I need a presentable car for ferrying the odd client about, and I spend up to three hours a day commuting, so I need something that's pleasant to be in. The current Volvo S60 ticks every single box.

It's not bangernomics though. A friend is an expert at that. He buys the cheapest thing he can find by sticking 'diesel' and '12 months MOT' into Autotrader, really not caring what, and runs it into the ground. No maintenance unless it stops, and simply driven until something expensive breaks, or it fails an MOT on something drastic.

He got £100 for his L reg Astra diesel on Ebay a few months back, which he bought two years before for £300, and spent literally nothing on apart from fuel, and a £50 battery. Now he has an F reg Peugeot 205 GRD which was also £300 and which he's also aiming to get a couple of years out of. I think he could probably do even better out of it by doing some basic maintenance, but he'd rather be on the golf course or chilling out with his son in his spare time. Can't argue with that, or such paltry motoring costs under his current system.

Cheers
DP

Edited by DP on 24/11/2008 at 15:01

Bangernomics - The down side - Rattle
That would work well if you don't mind risking dodgy brakes etc. If you don't need to touch them then great but nearly all cars will need work on brakes etc within 2 years. I am sure I could run my Fiesta (paid £350 for it) until the MOT runs out but I would be risking driving it with dodgy brakes hence its in the garage now. I think some people take bangernomics to extremes. I may paid £300 for his Fiesta two years back, it is still working and has got through the second MOT with him, it has been a very very cheap car to own but it still costs £200 at MOT time.

Bangernomics - The down side - Mapmaker
>>but nearly all cars will need work on brakes etc within 2 years.

Scarcely. In 8 years of car ownership, I've replaced one set of front pads and discs that needed doing when I bought it.
Bangernomics - The down side - Andrew-T
>In 8 years of car ownership, I've replaced one set of front pads and discs that needed doing when I bought it.

Well done. But unless you are extremely thorough, you can't rely on previous owners having done the same.
Bangernomics - The down side - TimOrridge
I may be wrong and someone may have picked up on this, but I dont think X Types are RWD are they not based on a ford FWD platform? Sorry off topic I know
Bangernomics - The down side - movilogo
Luck often plays a major role in bangernomics!

Some people can be winners and some others can be losers.

But with some cars (eg. Jaguars), probability of losing money is very high.

Bangernomics - The down side - Niallster
Tim,

The X type was initially only offered as all wheel drive and then later a front wheel drive option was added. As far as I know it has never been offered in rear wheel drive.

(anorak mode off).
Bangernomics - The down side - Bill Payer
I have a work colleage who did something very similar to the OP's mate - after years of having pretty top of the range BMW company cars he started out on his own and was very please with himself when he bought a BMW 728i for £3K.

Within days something had gone wrong with the climate control and it would only blow max-heat. Estimate to fix was...£3K (although, I've told this story elsewhere and been told it should be possible to fix for a lot less). Anyway, he was certainly driving around with all the windows wide open for some time!
Bangernomics - The down side - Rattle
My plans for the day are out of the window, ended up going to a scrapyard to get a new door latch and a reverse switch. Oh the joys of bangers.

Bangernomics - The down side - dxp55
The climate control on my Barge has stuck on 21.5 deg - fortunately it warms up to that and A/C cools it down to that so I am leaving well alone.
Bangernomics - The down side - oldnotbold
The heater vents are permanently open on the 405, so in summer I stuck a cornflake packet in the heater intake, and it wasn't too bad. Lovely now...
Bangernomics - The down side - Mapmaker
>>Oh the joys of bangers.


You are driving a banger. In this day and age, a far cry from bangernomics - which isn't about running nasty cars, expensively (as both you and OP's mate do).

There are 123 cars listed on autotrader between £500 and £1,000 engine size 1.6-1.9 litres, UNDER SEVEN years old.

Mondeos, Primeras, Xsaras, Vectras.

And 116 engine size 1-1.3 litres with the same spec.

Most of these will be cars you wouldn't need to touch for three years, save for changing the oil (and cambelt). Let alone faffing about with scrap yards (use eBay, they'll be delivered to your front door, ordered from the comfort of your armchair).
Bangernomics - The down side - movilogo
I was recently reading the book "Undercover Economist". It has an excellent description why it is tricky to buy used cars.
When a seller is selling a used car, he has more information about the car than the buyer. So, buyer assumes that there is a fault in the car (for which seller wants to get rid of it) so offers less. Seller, aware of the fault, agrees at a cheaper price. This reduces the overall price of sold vehicles. Now sellers of cars which are in really excellent condition are put off by such a low price. So, they hold their cars on. As a consequent, only "faulty" cars will flood the market. This will further reduce buyers' confidence and price will go down. So, the author concludes that it is very difficult to buy a good used car at cheap price! (just because people will sell lemons and hold on peaches)

Ok, like all economic theories. this is not a gospel. For example, some very good cars will come into market as owners won't be able to meet monthly payment.
But at least it explains why you need to be lucky to buy a used car :)

Edited by movilogo on 25/11/2008 at 16:38

Bangernomics - The down side - Rattle
Mapmaker you don't seem to understand the concept of very high insurance premiums for young male drivers in Manchester. 1.6 Mondeo £120 a month, 1.6 Premeria £130 a month, compared to £66 I am currently paying.

Bangernomics - The down side - oldnotbold
Movilogo - that's why buying cars from the deceased's estate is a good one. They are often well-cared for.
Bangernomics - The down side - Pebble
- that's why buying cars from the deceased's estate is a good one. They
are often well-cared for.


Agreed! In my case, the deceased's family donated his car to a charity used car lot, which is where I found my New Yorker. One advantage of buying from a charity lot is you pay no sales tax, so I got the car for...ummm...click currency converter...a shade over 800 pounds sterling. Brilliant!
Bangernomics - The down side - Mapmaker
Mapmaker you don't seem to understand the concept of very high insurance premiums for young


Rattle, quit trolling, because I specifically mentioned small cars for you.

There are 116 cars listed on autotrader between £500 and £1,000 engine size 1.0-1.3 litres, UNDER SEVEN years old.

Kas, Fiestas etc. Surely one of them would do for you, rather than the alleged wreck you (allegedly) persist in taking to the garage weekly at ruinous expense.

There are even 5 Matizes (sub-7-years, sub-£1,000) with engines smaller than a pint and a half.

Bangernomics - The down side - Cliff Pope
>>
When a seller is selling a used car he has more information about the car
than the buyer. >>


That is only the first falacy in the economist's argument. A seller is just as likely to be completely ignorant about the car. He may simply be trading on because he wants a more modern car, or getting rid of it on the basis of misinformation gained from his mate in the pub.
The buyer on the other hand might have done his research, consulted more knowledgeable friends for common faults, looked up magazine articles, etc, and be prepared to judge a car on inspection.

You only have to look at a typical reason for a car changing hands;

Seller - car now has what he panics into thinking is a "high" mileage, and imagines lots of horrendous bills approaching.

Buyer - sees a car with a nice healthy motorway mileage, running well, and knows he can fix any of the standard items that might need doing in the next few years.

Result - the seller sells in ignorance, the buyer buys with knowledge and experience.
Bangernomics - The down side - Andrew-T
A seller is just as likely to be completely ignorant about the car ...

Hardly. The chance of a buyer knowing anything about a seller's vehicle (except in general terms) is just about zero. Many, perhaps most, cars for sale privately will have been owned by their sellers for some time, who may well (as many backroomers have stressed) be selling for a good reason. But your point must be valid for forecourt cars which have been traded in. A few may have been maintained at that garage, but the 'sellers' there are unlikely to know much about them.