Not really sure on this one, could be because of memory problems, maybe because i'm more inclined to see the positives in an otherwise poor car?. Also could be something I have noticed on the forum from some members in particular which would suggest the only way a car can be enjoyable (or not disappointing) to drive is by handling really well.
Vehicles I have enjoyed driving (for various reasons other than handling prowess or performance) but perhaps shouldn't have include a Nissan Serena 2.3d, Daihatsu Move (850cc n/a 3 pot, 3sp t/c auto), Vauxhall Midi van (with a column change manual), Suzuki ST90 panel van, Daihatsu Sirion (1.0), my recently departed Piaggio Porter. Plus various buses, including one town service bus which was pitifully slow in accelerating but made late town service more interesting because of the challenge in keeping to time.
If pushed, i'd say my first car, a 1977 Fiesta 1.1, was a disappointment, as was my third, a 1978 Opel Ascona 1.9, but that was more to do with the fact that I shouldn't have bought either due to the exceptionally poor condition they were in.
Actually, one other has just came to mind, 4th gen Golf V6 4Motion. Too softly sprung to be fun to drive and no apparent (in the dry at least) benefits to being 4wd, notchy manual shift and no auto option (if memory serves). As a cruiser, the V5 was better (made a nicer noise and could be had as an auto) and for a twisty road (accepting no 4th gen Golfs were that great), the lighter (especially in the nose) 1.8 turbo was more fun.
Incidentally, i did also have a Capri (1.6 Laser) and loved it!.
|