Polo 1.2. Vs Peugeot 206 1.1 - Shay uk
Hello everyone and thanks for reading my post.

After several weeks of searching and getting help from this forums as well, I decided to go for a polo 1.2 2005-7. I realized that the price would be something around £2000 to £2400. At the same time I have had a look at my older favourite car which is Peugeot 206 1.1, which I noticed that I can get a fairly much lower milaged one than polo 1.2 with £1000 to £1400 . Both insurance cost is the same for me.

So basically my questions is how do you see both cars and what are the weak points based on your own experience and/or skills? As I never had any of them, however a few friends and relatives were happy with their Peugeot 206 1.4 .

Please let me know if I missed something or you had any questions.

Thanks and best regards,
Shay
Polo 1.2. Vs Peugeot 206 1.1 - Gibbo_Wirral

I've never owned a 206 but I do see a large number of them on the road - especially much older ones. My neighbour drives an old "W" reg model. It looks like a shed, he does very little in cleaning and servicing but it just runs and runs.

Whether that's a testament to their reliability or ruggedness I can't say.

I do Peugeot diagnostics around Merseyside and Cheshire and this car is the one which I get the least custom from.

Edited by Gibbo_Wirral on 07/01/2016 at 13:21

Polo 1.2. Vs Peugeot 206 1.1 - 72 dudes

Some experience of the 206 1.1, as my late father had one, and I used to take it out for an "Italian tune-up" whenever I visited, usually with him in the passenger seat.

Not a lot of power, but revs smoothly and sweetly. My dad did a ridiculously low mileage with short journeys around town, but he never had any problems with it mechanically.

My only complaint was the choppy ride around town.

Edited by 72 dudes on 07/01/2016 at 18:33

Polo 1.2. Vs Peugeot 206 1.1 - Cyd

We bought an 03 polo 1.2 for my 18yr old son just 1 month after passing his test. It's a lovely ride, quite roomy for a small car, reasonably zippy and we are chuffed with it.

Check engine light with no 2 misfire code can indicate burned valves (we don't have this problem and use super unleaded).

Check the air con heatr control works properly from cold to hot and vice versa several times. Recirc flap too. Easy to fix but parts pricey (about £100 a motor unit).

Otherwise check all the usual stuff you'd do when buying any car.

Polo 1.2. Vs Peugeot 206 1.1 - elekie&a/c doctor

I think a 1.2 Polo with the 3 cylinder engine would be at the bottom of my shopping list,if at all.The engine is blessed with major issues that are expensive to fix.The 206 with the 1.1 engine are surprisingly good little runners with very few issues.It is a basic engine with a cambelt and no complications.Certainly worth a look.

Polo 1.2. Vs Peugeot 206 1.1 - Shay uk
Thanks everybody, please keep up the comments, I appreciate it.
Polo 1.2. Vs Peugeot 206 1.1 - Avant

We're at risk of repeating comments we made on your previous thread. The most important thing is that condition matters more than make or model at this end of the market.

But if you want a Polo you may be better to go for a four-cylinder 1.4. Even them, £2000 is a lot to pay for a 10-year-old car, and a cheaper, well-looked-after Peugeot could be a possibility (French electrics are suspect, but by 10 years old will probably already have gone wrong and been repaired!).

Personally in your position I'd have a Fiesta or Yaris in preference to either - but I've said that before!

Edited by Avant on 07/01/2016 at 22:26