Insurance excess mitigation on hire cars?

I have use of a hire car after a minor ‘no fault’ incident. The hire company damage excess being £300 (reflecting that of my own policy) regardless of how any damage is caused. I have rightly but begrudgingly chosen to negate this with £70’s worth of excess mitigation insurance to the hire company.

If, for example, some unknown person ‘keys’ my car, I have the option of having it cosmetically repaired at my expense at around £70, thus avoiding my own policy excess costs. If on the other hand the hire car is damaged in this (or any other) way, I’d have to fork out £300, with little chance of any change.

It cannot be morally right that I cannot re-claim this premium from the other party’s insurer via my own policy's Legal Protection, and I’m down £70.

Asked on 7 December 2015 by Whatdowepayourroadtaxfor

Answered by Honest John
I'd guess that your hire car is actually a Credit Hire car, the cost of which you are directly liable for if the 3rd party insurer challenges the cost of it. Accident Management is a racket, Credit Hire is a racket and the excess mitigation situation you describe is also a racket. There are more crooks in the Insurance, Accident Management and Credit Hire businesses than there are in prison. But no private individual has the money to take a case to the High Court and challenge them (£200k), so they don't.
Similar questions
I had an accident in October, I was not at fault. It has been shambolic from the start. I saw in one of your columns an article about Tort law, which I thought also applied to me. My car was a write off...
If I make a claim on car rental insurance cover, does it affect my premiums for my personal car insurance?
A school bus reversed into my sister's car while she was dropping off her grandchildren at school. She sounded her horn before the collision but the driver then drove off. While still in a state of shock,...