Trussed me

The email from BK (Smack, the knife, 21 February 2009) prompted me to relate my experience of the all-too-common supermarket carpark shunt. When another party backed into my car, they freely admitted liability, and they agreed to pay for repairs without involving insurance. This all changed once I forwarded the estimate to them, and their insurance company contacted me to dispute liability. Several letters later, I was advised by my insurance that the best outcome was 50:50 liability, which I accepted. Because I had trusted the goodwill of the other party, I neglected to assemble adequate supporting evidence against them. This would have included photographs, independent witness statements, and carpark CCTV coverage. I have learned the lesson and, I’m sorry to say, I will not trust in human nature again, because it is too easily swayed by the insurance companies.

Asked on 28 March 2009 by

Answered by Honest John
You said it all. Many thanks.
Similar questions
I was involved in a car accident last year and the other party admitted liability. His insurance company rang and confirmed liability both to me and my insurers. My insurance duly paid for all the repairs...
My wife's car was a 1995 Mazda 323 with 70,000 miles with FSH and in good condition. She loved it, put a personalised number plate on it and had intended to use it until she is too old to drive. Now it...
Is it any wonder car insurance is so expensive? A couple of days ago, my wife had a 50/50 door mirror clash on a narrow country lane. Both mirrors were broken but there were no other damage or injuries....
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer