Kerbing speed

There’s regular and understandable criticism in your column from you and your readers about the damaging effect of speed bumps. Whilst I don’t like them any more than anybody else it would at least be a bit of comfort to see some acknowledgement from you and others of the reason for these bumps being installed. Some drivers have absolutely no regard for the safety of others and do not apply consistent risk assessment to their surroundings (parked cars, children, junctions, road conditions etc.), which is a technique used by you and many of us whether consciously or not. We’ve all seen drivers at inappropriate speeds, even in supermarket car parks and leafy suburbs, many of whom are ‘rat-running’ for their own convenience. The speed bumps are simply an attempt to think for these drivers who can’t distinguish between a minor road and a highway and it’s not until driving standards and thought for fellow man improves that we’ll see an end to the blight of speed bumps.

Asked on 21 August 2010 by RC, Torquay

Answered by Honest John
My campaign against these dangerous obstructions will not abate. Speed cushions destroy the hidden inner shoulders of car tyres, leading to unforeseen blowouts that could be at high speed later in a car's journey. Speed humps and cushions destroy car suspension springs. Speed humps cause damage to car sumps. Elderly people trip over speed cushions crossing the road and break their legs. But the strongest argument against them is that the pounding from vehicles rising up over them then crashing down the other side destroys the sub-structure of roads, leading to potholes all around them and hugely increasing road maintenance costs, which we as a country cannot afford (and which is why our roads are in such an appalling state). There is also evidence that tremors from vehicles crashing over speed humps sends shockwaves into the walls of buildings adjacent to roads, sometimes leading to collapse. The answer, as I have proposed many times, is sections of roads completely block paved from wall to wall with no separate footways. These sections need only be a 100 feet long, but have been proven (in Holland) to disquiet drivers sufficiently to slow them right down, and protect any pedestrians in the vicinity, without dangerously damaging vehicles or the sub structures of the roads themselves.
Similar questions
I'm probably not going to get any sympathy, but being a builder I drive a van. I don't have explain what happens when you traverse four speed humps with a van full of tools and materials. Unpleasant is...
I have just finished reading the article "Green Mean & Clean" by Judith Woods and it occurred to me that the Millbrook Proving Ground could be used to demonstrate the effect that the ubiquitous speed bumps...
According to my local paper, in the first 3 months of 2010 motorists made 473 claims to Gloucestershire County Council for vehicles damaged by potholes. All but one were rejected. In the whole of last...