REAL MPG:
Mercedes-Benz A-Class (2005 - 2012)
.jpg)
000367
27–60
Real MPG
41.9
Average
Much better execution of original A-Class concept. Feels far higher quality, especially inside. Easy to park.
Not 'special' to drive. Smaller petrol engines are underpowered. Expensive compared to the competition. Rust problem in doors emerging.
Select engine for more Real MPG information:
| Engine | Official MPG | Real MPG Avg. | Real MPG % | |
| A150 | 45.6 mpg | 37.7 mpg | 83% |  |
| A150 BlueEfficiency | 48.7 mpg | 39.0 mpg | 80% | |
| A160 Autotronic | 41.5 mpg | 34.4 mpg | 83% | |
| A160 BlueEfficiency | 42.8–47.1 mpg | 39.4 mpg | 88% | |
| A160 CDI | 57.6 mpg | 47.3 mpg | 82% | |
| A160 CDI Autotronic | 52.3 mpg | 46.9 mpg | 90% | |
| A160 CDI BlueEfficiency | 52.3–64.2 mpg | 54.1 mpg | 93% | |
| A170 | 42.8 mpg | 38.6 mpg | 90% | |
| A170 BlueEfficiency | 46.3 mpg | 36.0 mpg | 78% | |
| A180 Autotronic | 39.8–41.5 mpg | 35.8 mpg | 88% | |
| A180 Blue Efficiency | 42.8–44.8 mpg | - | - | |
| A180 BlueEfficiency | 43.5–44.8 mpg | - | - | |
| A180 CDI | 52.3–57.6 mpg | 49.3 mpg | 90% | |
| A180 CDI Autotronic | 51.4–52.3 mpg | 44.9 mpg | 87% | |
| A200 | 38.1 mpg | 37.7 mpg | 99% | |
| A200 CDI | 53.1 mpg | 49.4 mpg | 93% | |
| A200 Turbo | 33.6 mpg | 27.5 mpg | 82% | |
Our Fuel Cost Calculator shows you which will be the best choice for you.
Compare the running costs of petrol, diesel and electric cars to make the right choice for you.
Read the Honest John review...
-
.jpg)
Mercedes-Benz A-Class (2005 - 2012)
Much better execution of original A-Class concept. Feels far higher quality, especially inside. Easy to park.
.jpg)
Rivals
| Mercedes-Benz A-Class (2005 - 2012) | 41.9 | avg mpg |
| Peugeot 208 (2012 - 2019) | 52.8 | avg mpg |
| Ford Fiesta (2008 - 2013) | 48.8 | avg mpg |
| Suzuki Swift (2010 - 2017) | 48.7 | avg mpg |
.jpg)
.jpg)
