|
It's hard to say this, but I actually find myself in broad agreement with Jamie on this one, and with a lot of the subsequent postings.
In my view there is a lighting overload in general. On town streets there's often a plethora of bright non-traffic signs, compounded by idiots driving with foglights as well as headlights. Add to this the dreadful Xenon lights which are just not controlled properly by their aiming technology.
On country roads there's also too much light on vehicles, except that here the intermittent darkness means the driver's eyes are continually adjusting. Again, the use of foglights and Xenons is part of the problem.
I do a fair amount of driving at around 10:00 - 11:00 at night and am often stuck behind a driver who is obviously having problems with oncoming lights. Despite my age I'm fortunate to be immune to this, but I need my glasses - glare is bad enough, but badly-focused glare which spreads over your field of vision is worse - despite the fact that I'm legal to drive without them, according to my optician.
|
Despite my age I'm fortunate to be immune to this, but I need my glasses - glare is bad enough, but badly-focused glare which spreads over your field of vision is worse - despite the fact that I'm legal to drive without them, according to my optician.
As far as eyesight goes, the law simply requires you to be able to read a number plate at the prescribed distance, 20 metres for modern plates, 20.5 metres for old style plates - if you need spectacles/contact lenses to pass that test then you must wear them at all times when driving.
That's an appalling low standard of eyesight, in my opinion.
|
|
And even if you have tunnel vision or only have one eye, as long as you can read the number plates, you're OK ...
|
|
Surely someone with vision in just one eye can't just distances very well?
I have glasses but my optician says my eyes are 'nearly fine' and the specs are a minor tweak. I could probably pass the eyesight test on the European standard 18 metres on a good day but not on our 20.
|
Surely someone with vision in just one eye can't just distances very well?
I have glasses but my optician says my eyes are 'nearly fine' and the specs are a minor tweak. I could probably pass the eyesight test on the European standard 18 metres on a good day but not on our 20.
From a UK legal point of view, the minimum test doesn't test distance estimate - and if you can't pass the UK 20m test unaided, you're legally required to wear your spectacles at all times when driving.
From a realistic pount of view, most drivers judge distance by apparent size, not the focussing effect of two eyes.
|
|
I left my prescription sunglasses in my Focus when I sold it so did have to make do with normal shades on sunny days for a while, the sky didn't fall in.
You'd think if you bought a car with someone elses specs - which are no use to you - you'd post them back wouldn't you?
|
|
Many people wouldn't realise they weren't plain - probably use them and complain about the previous owner buying cheap sunglasses with poor optics !!
|
|
Cheap?! He can tell that to my bank account.
|
|
I meant perceived cheap, not real cheap.
|
|
When you change glasses every two years, prescription bifocal sunglasses are a thing you cannot afford on a pension :-)
|
When you change glasses every two years, prescription bifocal sunglasses are a thing you cannot afford on a pension :-)
The prescription sunglasses can be single vision, ie distance vision and often free on a "Buy one, get one free offer" - there are also a few frames supplied with magnetically attached polarised tinted filters - my polycarbonate single vision glasses are like this and the "sunglass" attachment goes on or off according to needs.
G;lasses only need changing if the eyesight changes - the rate of change slows down eventually !
|
|
I can recommend a great value American website which make specs to your prescription but Avant might do me for 'plugging.'
:P
|
|
I too have problems with super-bright headlights, but only on country B roads. The worst offenders are cars with discharge lighting. When they were first used they were on expensive cars but now increasingly on cheaper models. I pointed out to my wife how the colour of the lights changed from blue to yellow/white as the cars went by.
I began later than most. I took my motorcycle test during the late 1950s and my car test in 1963, both of which I passed first time. My latest eye test (this year) showed that I was marginal on the number-plate test so I bought prescription driving glasses having tinted polarised reactolight lenses.
I used to wear polarised sunglasses when driving in bright conditions, and I always have the sunshade visors down - I got those habits during my years in Africa. Passengers have complained that they can’t see the sky, but that’s the point; the sky gives veiling glare (as do the brighter street luminaires) and I want to see the road ahead.
I was advised by the optician to wear the prescription glasses at night too. I didn’t think that they would be acceptable at night, but they are; the tint under low light conditions is very slight. When conditions are really bad I don’t use them.
As for people using fog lights when there is no fog, I can think of two things
A - I wonder if the driver needs an eye test, whatever their age
B – Does the driver know where the switch is ?
I have fog lights on my car but they cancel to OFF when the ignition is switched off.
|
|
No, carry on, Jamie - a forum member recommending a good product, as I might recommend Skoda for example, is different from someone trying to advertise their own product for free.
|
|
Yes but you can only be plugging Skoda for a bet.
Ive got glasses from www.goggles4u.co.uk/ on four occasions. So long as you know your exact prescription you'll be fine, if not then get an eye test at Specsavers, they'll print it on a little card for you.
They come from California and they do take a few weeks to arrive so if you're in no rush they're a good deal.
|
|
I think there is a huge problem with chavs fitting HID kits to bangers and cars without ellipsoidal headlights and so diffusing and scrattering light everwhere.
Some of these kits are 50w instead of the OE 35W so even worse.
I see them every day coming the other way, often with rediculous blue/purple shades of white.
The other problem is chavs 'doing up' cars with headlights bought online meant for LDH countries and so dipping into the faces of oncoming traffic..
|
Yes but you can only be plugging Skoda for a bet.
Ive got glasses from www.goggles4u.co.uk/ on four occasions. So long as you know your exact prescription you'll be fine, if not then get an eye test at Specsavers, they'll print it on a little card for you.
They come from California and they do take a few weeks to arrive so if you're in no rush they're a good deal.
i've never understood how that works - as well as the dioptre/prism parts of an opticians prescription which is all they give the customer, conventional opticians also measure the eye centres for width/height and is used to order spectacles. In the case of bifocals and varifocals they also have to determine the vertical distance between the two focus centres and for varifocals they select one of many intermediate patterns to suit the customers "lifestyle".
Since you never get given the precise positioning measurements, how can the correct spectacles be made by a 3rd party ?
|
|
Yes thats what the rip off merchants of the high street want you to think, that all that guff they tell you actually matters and nobody else can possibly make you a set of specs.
The reality is your prescription is a batch of numbers which they print on a card, type the numbers into the website and they'll make them. Theres measurements for sizes obviously as well, these can be combatted with use of a tape measure. Available from all good retailers.
|
|
How do you measure "rear focal distance" ?
|
|
No idea what it is, but if I have any of it then it was included in those seemingly random numbers used to make the prescription.
I've had expensive specs done by high street merchants and I've had ones ordered online simply by typing in my prescription and they're exactly the same. There is no difference. All the jargon the suits in specsavers throw at you is merely designed to scare you into emptying your wallet.
|
|
I'm a pensioner, I go to Specsavers who will do prescription Polarised sunglasses as part of their 2 for the price of 1 offer for a modest additional fee.
Alternate years, I take their prescription to an independent in Holmfirth who will provide my ordinary varifocals at a reasonable price (less than £50 including frames).
Ask around and you may find a similar independent supplier.
|
|
Not sure how the thread has gone down the Eyesight avenue as this issue seems to effect people with all types of vision. By the way, you can get a Private Pilots Licence with one eye.
I have noticed that many Xenon type headlights (even on new cars) can appear badly adjusted.
|
Not sure how the thread has gone down the Eyesight avenue as this issue seems to effect people with all types of vision. By the way, you can get a Private Pilots Licence with one eye.
I have noticed that many Xenon type headlights (even on new cars) can appear badly adjusted.
It went down the eyesight avenue because a significant number of people don't seem to have problems with dazzle while others do - and some older people, needing/wearing corrective spectacles don't have the problem so it's not to do with age or proper spectacles.
So maybe the problem isn't on the cars coming the other way !
Edited by RT on 23/12/2012 at 13:03
|
Not sure how the thread has gone down the Eyesight avenue as this issue seems to effect people with all types of vision. By the way, you can get a Private Pilots Licence with one eye.
I have noticed that many Xenon type headlights (even on new cars) can appear badly adjusted.
It went down the eyesight avenue because a significant number of people don't seem to have problems with dazzle while others do - and some older people, needing/wearing corrective spectacles don't have the problem so it's not to do with age or proper spectacles.
So maybe the problem isn't on the cars coming the other way !
Yes... the problem is the duffers who have eyesight problems and don't get eye tests...
Edited by madf on 23/12/2012 at 17:01
|
|
My eyesight is fine. However, I do seem to suffer more than some from not only oncoming lights but from bright sky and tend to leave my sun visor down most of the time. I mentioned this to my Optician who said this is down to eye pigmentation. Certain colours of eye let in more light than others and my colouring is one of these. This has nothing to do with eyesight.
Edited by davecooper on 24/12/2012 at 21:43
|
My eyesight is fine. However, I do seem to suffer more than some from not only oncoming lights but from bright sky and tend to leave my sun visor down most of the time. I mentioned this to my Optician who said this is down to eye pigmentation. Certain colours of eye let in more light than others and my colouring is one of these. This has nothing to do with eyesight.
Not heard that before - I thought it was the iris size that controlled the amount of light.
Did the optician say which colour of eye was best/worst ?
|
|
RT asked: Did the optician say which colour of eye was best/worst ?
This webpage suggests that brown eyes let in less light than the other colours:
www.allaboutvision.com/conditions/lightsensitive.h...m
That doesn't tie in with my experience though. My partner has brown eyes and she wears shades at every opportunity. Mine are blue/grey and I don't even own a pair. The page does suggest, however, that it's not a simple issue.
Another page on the same site bears out my reported observation, above, about dazzle and cataracts:
www.allaboutvision.com/conditions/cataracts.htm
Edited by John Boy on 26/12/2012 at 12:13
|
|
"That doesn't tie in with my experience though. My partner has brown eyes and she wears shades at every opportunity. Mine are blue/grey and I don't even own a pair. The page does suggest, however, that it's not a simple issue."
Agreed - it isn't simple as SWMBO (blue-grey eyes, needs sunglasses in any bright weather) and I (brown eyes, use them only when driving a convertible) are the other way round from you. It must be something else to do with the nature of one's eyes.
I'm another of those who can't see the need for xenon headlights - certainly at legal speeds. The most powerful lights I've had in any car are the ones in my current Octavia vRS - more than adequate for any sort of driving that I'm likely to do.
|
|
I am also not sure of the wisdom of the sudden end of street lights. Heading West on the M4 it is copiously illumintated, then just after J12 you are cast into outer darkness. I find that there are always a few moments of worry as the eyes get adjusted to the pitch black and the oncoming crazed Audi drivers belting down from Swindon ...
|
|
Same on M2 ... lights end shortly before Medway services ... at the same time motorway reduces from 3 to lanes to 2
|
"That doesn't tie in with my experience though. My partner has brown eyes and she wears shades at every opportunity. Mine are blue/grey and I don't even own a pair. The page does suggest, however, that it's not a simple issue."
Agreed - it isn't simple as SWMBO (blue-grey eyes, needs sunglasses in any bright weather) and I (brown eyes, use them only when driving a convertible) are the other way round from you. It must be something else to do with the nature of one's eyes.
I'm another of those who can't see the need for xenon headlights - certainly at legal speeds. The most powerful lights I've had in any car are the ones in my current Octavia vRS - more than adequate for any sort of driving that I'm likely to do.
It is; we all have different numbers of photoreceptor cells in the back of our eyes (rods and cones as they are known). At low light levels we use the rods (we've got 120 mill of them and they don't do colour) and in brighter light, the cones, which help us to distinguish colour (about 6 mill of those). There's several different types of those, for different wavelengths of light. This set-up also depends on whether you are colour-blind or not! We have another kind of cell in our eyes which helps the pupils dilate in response to light but it's not a rod or a cone.
Also, blue and green eyes don't technically exist - the colour comes about because of Rayleigh scattering in the pigmented part of the eye (look up 'why is the sky blue?') However, lighter coloured eyes do have less melanin in them.
|
|
Thank you so much for that, Bobbin: we are really lucky to have all manner of expertise on this forum! Although I'm not sure I like the idea of an Essex town being scattered in my eyes.....
|
|
Like a few others I leave the sun visor down most of the time. It also helps eliminate glare from night street lights constantly flashing into the eyes every time I drive towards them.
As for Xenon lights many as so excessively bright they often cause an oncoming driver to turn their head away from the light thus increasing the odds of a head-on collision with the Xenon lit vehicle. Not what one would describe as making a contribution to road safety.
|
|
Update: Following sweary incident with braindead pensioner in Vauxhall somethingorother detailed in my original post, today I was parked at the side of the road as I wandered over to a shop. I returned to my car, seatbelt on, just about to start the engine when a knobjockey parks in front of me, facing me (therefore on the wrong side of the road) with their foglights on.
Imagine my surprise upon discovering it was the exact same Vauxhall somethingorother driven by the exact same braindead pensioner. Already in a bad mood this was not a good thing to happen, I therefore exited my vehicle, made my way to the pavement and said (apologies to Avant in advance);
Didn't I tell you last week to turn your f***ing foglights off?
For the record it was about 3pm today, it was indeed dark and grey but not a hint of fog in sight. Braindead pensioner then proceeded to tell me how he supposedly can't see and needs them on, I calmly pointed out perhaps he shouldn't be driving if he can't see. He then brought out the classic 'I've been driving for 60 years' bit, as though it makes up for blindness. I have edited the content of this discussion so as to not offend the children here, but I think you get the drift.
Anyway I noted his reg down when I got back in the car and will let Old Bill know theres a blind driver in the area.
|
Anyway I noted his reg down when I got back in the car and will let Old Bill know theres a blind driver in the area.
They will be thrilled to have such an exciting crime to pursue.
|
|
The Police race Government issue Volvo estates through busy cities to hunt down a cretin with no tax disc, so they clearly love pursuing trivial matters.
|
|
You might do better letting DVLA know - I understand they do have procedures for investigating reports of people unfit to drive medically.
|
|
Ok I'll pass it onto the plebs at Swansea.
|
|
It's worth pursuing jamie especially as the person concerned admitted they couldn't see properly.
I reported a speeding Ford driver who was driving like a maniac through a housing estate and a primary school. The police tracked down the offending motorist which shows they do take notice when an eye witness report is presented to them.
|
"Ok I'll pass it onto the plebs at Swansea."
Better not call them 'plebs' when you contact them. In some circles that's very offensive especially now that, with the recent publicity, people have looked up the word in a dictionary.
|
|
Well the publicity is changing now since the revelation that - in a rare occurence - a police officer has impersonated a member of the public. But yes we need a new word now to describe useless cretins.
|
|
I don't know why 'plebs' has become an offensive term: one would need to look up and find out when this happened (I suspect the Victorians).
In Latin 'plebs' (a singular noun - plural plebes) was an inoffensive word meaning 'the general public' - as opposed to Roman emperors and senators.
|
|
It probably evolved over time due to the oppressive nature of the aristocracy vs plebs dynamic.
|
|
The Department for Transport (DfT) revoked or blocked 5,285 licences for cars and motorbikes in 2011 because the motorists could not pass a standard eye test. This is an increase of eight per cent since 2010, when 4,906 motorists were banned.
Read more: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-news/consumer-news/62160/thousands-drivers-banned-poor-eyesight#ixzz2GzmuR75O
|
|
"I don't know why 'plebs' has become an offensive term: one would need to look up and find out when this happened (I suspect the Victorians)."
It has become offensive because there is only a small gap between making an objective statement about someone being of lower class than someone else and getting snobbish and condescending about it. And in a class-conscious society that was bound to happen.
As regards when it happened, the O.E.D. certainly gives an example from the Victorian era:
"...is a gross pleb, and his features stamp him low-born" - 1878.
But, even earlier:
"You're under my roof, you pleb" sounds pretty condescending, though it's difficult to tell from such a short quotation. Date: 1795.
|
|
Maybe it's time for a new definition : P.L.E.B. - Powerful Lights Extremely Bonkers
|
|
I'm 73 and have driven all manner of vehicles from 15 ton Army Scammels pulling 'dead' tanks, to Go-carts since I was 16 and have done around 200k miles so that's my CV. On the subject of eyesight can I put in my 2 penny worth?
About 6 or so years ago after wearing long dist and short dist specs since I was 20 I noticed that for reading I could increase the distance I could see clearly until about 3 years ago I didn't need glasses for reading. At the same time I noticed that my long sight was improving rapidly. Having an eyesight test 3 months ago I was told I didn't need glasses for either reading or long distance. So as I was getting older my sight was reverting back to what it had been when I was a teenager. I used the prescription to get glasses from GlassesDirect as my licence said I should wear them, which I do at all times when driving. The difference they make is marginal.
Can any knowledgeable contributer tell me if my sight situation is rare or normal, ie as one gets older ones sight can improve.
PS:- I was always told that if I was 'blinded' by on coming car lights to close one eye at the time.
|
|
On my last eye test I also said my alround eyesight was getting better they have just a got a new machine and gave me full test the outcome is that I have the outset of Glucoma apparently it makes your vision better for a short peiod of time.
|
|