This week's Auto Express has a review of eight new-model tyres, six of which have the new tyre ratings, two haven't been reviewed yet.
It's interesting to note that on the "wet grip" category, only the Michelin Energy Saver+ tyre has the highest grade A rating. This raised an eyebrow with me straight away.
Sure enough, the tyre was flat bottom of the list for wet grip, and performed similarly badly for wet handling, aquaplaning etc. The other tyres, rated B or unrated, all outperformed it, some comfortably.
This is fair enough -- the ES+ is an eco tyre, and its grip is correspondingly compromised. I had thought this was obvious really.
But a grade A? How on Earth did this happen?
Wet grip is the parameter that, for me, defines a good, vs a bad tyre. Safety is everything. If these ratings are throwing up such anomalies the first time they're even put under the spotlight, what use are they?
|