Surely courtesy car insurance is no different to insuring cars for test drives?
No idea if or how insurance companies view them differently.
What I do know is that lending out 10 courtesy cars for an average of say 15 hours per day X 7 days per week = a lot more hours that a dealer's cars are on the road than they are for test drives; plus where are they parked etc
Is this why one large chain reputedly refuses test drives unless the victim (sorry, customer) signs up to buy first?
In my experience the use of the word "reputedly" means it's untrue.
Certainly I know of dealerships who, when dealing with customers who endlessly want to test-drive cars but who never actually buy, have said enough is enough & refuse any further test-drives until the customer signs to say he will purchase (which never happens, obviously).
I also know of groups who ask the customer to agree to purchase "subject to a satisfactory test-drive" before transporting the car from one site to another. In the case of national groups this cost can be quite substantial & so IMO understandable.
|