European cars - Time to be Controversial - sirionman

I am bracing myself for the hate mail as I write this.

I read this forum regularly and there is a theme running through the majority of technical and discussion postings here - they involve European cars. There I said it.

For sure Asian branded cars are not perfect but based on the gripes and grizzles at Honest John website they ain't far off being superb. Specifically I would single out I VAG as a terrible brand of car to own, but my observation applies to all Euro cars.

I am on my second Daihatsu Sirion and I just sit in it and drive it (and I do huge mileages), and I can see most people turning their noses up already. I would own any Asian car though in favour of some bling Euro car because I would take reliability over status or style any day of the week. I would rather take a belt sander to my privates than own a European car. Take a look at the next car you see broken down on the side of the road and it will most likely be a European car (I include UK in European).

Now I shall stand by to suffer the slings and arrows of European car owners.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - unthrottled

Make sure you're comparing apples with apples. You can't compare an Avensis with a vectra because the Avensis costs so much more.

The diesel option is taken up by a lower proportion of Asian car drivers than European car drivers-which greatly simplifies the engineering challenge.

It is no exageration to say that without European car makers, diesel would not be an option in the automotive world.

It is fair to say that Japanese (esp. Toyota) have the best production engineering/management in the world. But Japanese car makers have tended to very conservative-letting the Europeans lead the field in innovation, and only adopting the technologies when the bugs have come to light and been ironed out.

My family have had a mixture of European and Asian cars. All of the cars, regardless of make, have been very reliable. I think it's the way people drive 'em!

Edited by unthrottled on 02/01/2012 at 18:05

European cars - Time to be Controversial - RT

Whilst it's easy to identify which continent a brand originates from, it's all very hazy after that because of the influences from the continent where a model is actually built - and more importantly which continent the engineering development was done.

Is there still such a thing as a European car maker? Many Asian brands are built in Europe, some developed here. Ford and Opel/Vauxhall have big chunks of development done in North America and Asia. BMW and Mercedes-Benz have certain models which originate from North America.

I can remember making a principle decision in the late 1970's not to buy British cars but bought plenty of Fords and Vauxhalls after that - all built outside the UK - and then I moved onto Asian-built cars.

I think it's foolhardy to generalise - there's good and bad brands on each continent but the proportions do vary.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - Bobbin Threadbare

I like Japanese cars. Two in my household; one Toyota and one Mazda. I can't really say that the Ford I before was an American car though.....!

European cars - Time to be Controversial - 475TBJ

Laughable comparing a Vectra with an Avensis. Vectra is no longer made. The Avenis will be going long after a Vectra. Avensis, especially petrol, always good for 400,000 miles!

European cars - Time to be Controversial - 475TBJ

And for example in 2005 the Vectra range started at a higher price than the Avensis. The only way a Vectra was cheaper than an Avensis was after the hefty discounts Vauxhall had to offer as a result of too many cars being produced for too few buyers.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - oldroverboy

Since i've been driving, I have had, in approximate order (funny thing memory)

Mini clubman, renault 16, marina coupe, maxi, austin 1300,marina. viva hb, renault 5,mini, jetta,golf 1100, passat escort mk3 astra estate. astra sr cavalier sr astra gti cavalier sri, audi 100 estate, audi coupe, lotus eclat twinned with a metro, audi 80, rover 827, cavalier estate, rover 2i6 gti, rover 800, rover 216gti, rover 400, then rover 45 ,45,45.45, then Rover 75, rover 45,lacetti sw, rover 75, MGzt, punto (skint) then the current epica.

Which ones let me down? Well the jetta overheating, the lotus was just plain daft, but costly, but never broke down, the 216 gti spark generator broke down! the 400 hgf signs and the zt also had the signs of hgf. the lacetti had a bit of rough running at end of warranty, dealer unable to fix, so off it went, but no actual breakdown, and the epica minor warranty problems but (touch wood) all sorted now. As against that my wifes 1 litre toyota starlet still running sweet as a dream now 19 years old, (the car!)

Edited by OldRoverboy on 02/01/2012 at 19:02

European cars - Time to be Controversial - balleballe

I like Japanese cars. Two in my household; one Toyota and one Mazda. I can't really say that the Ford I before was an American car though.....!

Our mazda 6 is 'made' in the US ;-)
European cars - Time to be Controversial - Auristocrat

Make sure you're comparing apples with apples. You can't compare an Avensis with a vectra because the Avensis costs so much more.

Isn't this because the Vauxhall suffers from oversupply on the used market, and depreciates more heavily than the Avensis. If bought new, the Vauxhall (Insignia not Vectra) will be discounted more heavily than the Toyota. When you compare the new list prices of the Avensis and the Insignia, they are quite closely matched - the Avensis runs from £ 17,800 to about £ 27,800, and the Insignia from £ 16,200 to £ 29,500.

At the end of the day the Avensis and the Vectra/Insignia target the same sector of the market - so one is comparing apples with apples.

Since 1987 we've had 15 brand new cars - all Japanese brands. The European built cars (two Primeras, a Corolla, a Mazda 2, an Auris and a Concerto [built by Rover at Longbridge]) have been as well built and as reliable as the Japanese built cars (three Micras, a Sunny, a Civic 3 door, two Corollas, a Mazda 323 and a Mazda Premacy).

Edited by Auristocrat on 02/01/2012 at 18:53

European cars - Time to be Controversial - Falkirk Bairn

Vx heavily dependent on Day Rent Cos - just look at airport car parks - add to that the Company Fleets and this makes up a huge share Astra and Insignia sales- discounts up to 40% IIRC

Toyota gets a lot of private punters for their smaller cars but £28K on an Avensis is way over the top.........you can get a Lexus for that money. Honda have similarly overpriced the Accord.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - unthrottled

The only thing list price affects is BIK tax. The only price that matters is the price the car is actually sold for. Lots of manufacturers use laughably high list prices in order to create phoney discounts in order to entice a gullible and greedy public that they can get something for nothing.

I would bet that the actual transaction price between a Vectra and an Avensis similarly equipped would be quite marked. The Insignia is intended to be a more prestigious car than the Vectra was.

My dad had several Vectras. Every single one of them was utterly reliable.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - RT
The Insignia is intended to be a more prestigious car than the Vectra was.

My dad had several Vectras. Every single one of them was utterly reliable.

The Vectra-C was intended to replace both the unloved Vectra-B and the Omega - the Insignia is smaller than it's predeccessor.

Our several Cavaliers and one Vectra-C have been almost unbreakable - the one exception being a Cavalier cambelt failure but Vauxhall footed the bill as a goodwill gesture

European cars - Time to be Controversial - gordonbennet

I'm in broad agreement with the OP here, if a Japanese or Korean brand make an equivalent car to a European then by choice i'd prefer the Asian motor, Nissan excluded since its love in with Renault, and Mazda Diesel i wouldn;t have as a gift.

The problem is the model ranges offered, for example i'd give me eye teeth for a Sonata Estate, Magentis estate or Camry estate especially.

I'd have loved a Lexus 400 if Toyota had simply slung the Landcruiser engine in and some extra soundproofing they would have wiped the floor with the German products, Camry Diesel estate too, that would have been some machine.

Again in Diesel from it was almost impossible to get a Diesel automatic when Diesels were simple and totally reliable, now they are festooned with electronics and emissions systems we at long last get an Avensis automatic Diesel, only 15 years too late.

All cars that would have been brilliant sellers, but if they make them we never got to see them.

Just recently we wanted a small car with £30 VED and decent performance and 50+mpg minimum in day to day running, only two cars offered all we wanted, Citroen C2 VTS 1.6HDI, and Fiat Grand Punto 1.6 Multijet, we bought a C2, no other cars were available that ticked all our boxes.

What we would have ideally wanted was a Yaris with a 2.0 or 2.2 litre Avensis Diesel lump shoe horned in that would have been a stonking little car, but no according to the Asians and most other European makers if you want a small Diesel it has to be a slug that wouldn't pull you out of bed, or like the 1.9's in various VAG shells is either well up the VED scale or ugly as hell.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - RT

The problem is the model ranges offered, for example i'd give me eye teeth for a Sonata Estate, Magentis estate or Camry estate especially.

Hyundai must have been listening - the Sonata's successor, the i40, has been launched as an estate before the saloon/hatch - mind you it may not "qualify" as it's designed and developed in Germany, but still built in South Korea.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - gordonbennet

Hyundai must have been listening - the Sonata's successor, the i40, has been launched as an estate before the saloon/hatch -

Yes a fine looking car if not as pretty as the Kia Optima, which i doubt will get an estate option.

I liked the last model Sonata for its simple three box lines, would have made a good squared off proper estate, good value used too.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - TeeCee

Ah yes, the fleet market. That has a lot to answer for and I don't just mean the company car fleets.

Specific area of gripe here is servicing costs. The "European" manufacturers do everything to drive these down to attract fleet sales, including insanely extended periods between servicing, "filled for life" autoboxes and a slew of other penny-pinching tricks. The "Asian" manufacturers refuse to compromise long-term reliability for the sake of a few hundred quid over a cars fleet life and stick with annual fluid changes.

The end results we see reported here are fairly conclusive in my view.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - gordonbennet
The end results we see reported here are fairly conclusive in my view.

Couldn't agree more with the thrust of that, most of that sealed for life guff for autoboxes has been quietly reversed, and amzingly its now recommended for regular oil chnages again.

Note how those who still advocate starship mileage servicing haven't gone down the 5 year and more guarantee path.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - Avant

There should be no need for hate mail, Sirionman, as you're expressing an opinion to which you're entitled - and which is in any case a perfectly reasonable standpoint based on your experience and observation.

I think the truth of it is that Japanese cars, and the other Asian brands based on Japanese engineering, are more able to withstand neglect and abuse than European makes (particularly French ones). A higher proportion of their development costs seems to be spent on mechanical bits that you can't see, rather than cosmetic ones that you can.

My elder daughter is a safe driver but short on mechanical knowledge and 'car sympathy': her four consecutive 1.3 Yarises have been faultless over high mileages. I've been driving since 1966 and without claiming to be an expert driver I have reasonable car sympathy and I have my cars regularly serviced. I've had about 20 cars in this time - all European including seven big family Renaults - with no major problems, and no minor ones either with the most recent five VAG models. SWMBO can claim much the same for hers apart from one dreadful Fiat in the 1980s.

So there's a strong case if buying secondhand and with no knowledge of the previous owner(s) for buying Japanese, although I'd always go for one with a petrol engine. Japanese diesels (particularly Mazda's) don't have quite the same reputation for indestructibility.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - jamie745

You've also got to take simple numbers into account, if most people have a European Car then its not going to surprise anybody that they're the most mentioned in the technical advice section is it? All of last years top 10 UK sellers are European cars.

You could have 15 people, 10 own a European car and 5 own an Asian one, each of them gets a fault with their car it'd be pretty stupid to conclude '5 asian faults, 10 european faults, asian cars are twice as reliable!'

Asian cars may be put together solidly but not all of the engineering is particularly advanced, Charlton Heston had a similar setup on his chariot. Quite often they're function over form with very little to excite the buyer who wants a 'nice motor.' I know a Mercedes Benz would fall apart but would i take an Avensis over a C-Class? No.

unthrottled mentions the Vauxhall Vectra which has never been my favourite car but its no more unreliable than any other cheaply priced mass market car and the last one wasnt a bad looking car either to be fair to it.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - madf

Anyone read Car Mechanics? The used car buying guide?

Fairly comprehensive and a goood duide to reliability..On most Japanese cars, they strugggle to say anything after about 5 potential areas of weakness if neglcted.

Try looking at a Vectra diesel one.. or an Audi one.. or any MB built 1995 to 2004..Or a BMW 7 series..

A 7 series vs a Lexus 400 is no comparison... BMW electronics fail.. A 400 gets blamked out digits on the digital dash..

As for innovation, the last great innovation which changed motoring was the discbrake - in the 1950s...

European cars - Time to be Controversial - tony g
(I am on my second Daihatsu Sirion and I just sit in it and drive it)

Sirionman,
You miss one of the major reasons why people buy cars.Emotion.

Research into why people buy cars ,show that most people buy with their heart rather than their head.They don't just buy cars as a way of getting from a to b.

Buyers pay premium prices to own a car that satisfies their sense of style and flatters their ego.Why else would you buy a BMW 318 rather than a skoda octavia.
It's clear that you're a contradiction to the emotional buyer theory,a sirion ticks none of the emotional boxes ,dull to look at ,uninvolving to drive and does nothing for the ego. A real grey porridge of a car.

Having said that, perhaps theirs a sense of satisfaction,maybe a boost to the ego in not doing the conventional thing ?

Tony g
European cars - Time to be Controversial - Ethan Edwards

I agree Tony G. idiots do buy emotionally.

I fondly recall the 70's when many people stopped buying unreliable British rubbish and bought reliable dull Japanese cars. dull the 120Y may have been but on a winters morning when you drive past your neighbour cranking over his Marina without starting....boy was it satisfying.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - 475TBJ

tony g, 'Why else would you buy a BMW 318 rather than a skoda octavia.'

It's a better car, pretty well all round, albeit smaller inside.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - unthrottled

The 318 has a tiny cabin for its floorplan size-making it a 2+2 rather than a proper four seater. All other cars in this segment can sit four adults in comfort. It's rubbish in snow as well. You buy rear drive with your heart but buy front drive with your head. The 3 series is a nicer car than an Octavia, but it is not better.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - primeradriver

I agree Tony G. idiots do buy emotionally.

I fondly recall the 70's when many people stopped buying unreliable British rubbish and bought reliable dull Japanese cars. dull the 120Y may have been but on a winters morning when you drive past your neighbour cranking over his Marina without starting....boy was it satisfying.

Well... I can't say that the Marina was "emotionally" any more exciting than a 120Y!

But then there's nothing "exciting" about the vast majority of the identikit "charismatic" vehicles on the road today. The Megane for example is a flimsy and wallowy vehicle with limp, droning petrol engines and over-assisted steering. I can honestly say that our Mitsubishi Space Star (a box on wheels that was bought because it was cheap) offers far more feedback to the driver -- and it's hardly a thrill a minute.

I would have some sympathy with tony g's remarks if people actually did buy interesting vehicles -- but they don't in the main.

If you're going to buy a boring econobox, at least buy the one that works.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - 475TBJ

'but it is not better'

IT IS BETTER. you only have drive to know and discover it's a 4 seater. NOT 2+2.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - unthrottled

it's a 4 seater. NOT 2+2.

A six foot man cannot sit behind himself with any degree of comfort commensurate with a luxury car. IThe BMW maybe the ultimate driving machine-but it's not the ultimate passnger machine-at least in one and three series offerings. Compare rear leg room with a Focus or a Golf. There's a heavy price to be paid for an engine bay that can accomadate a straight 6 and maintain equal weight distribution. That's why most other marques don't do it.

Don't get me wrong, the 3 series is a lovely car, but it ain't the most practical car in its class.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - gordonbennet

Agree with these posts, there's nothing more satisfying that just opening the door and climbing in and the door shuts lightly like nearly all Japanese cars do, you turn the key, the car fires up, it doesn't cough or splutter, its never heard of breaking down, everything works and continues to do so, annual service dealer visit only and whilst there he doesn't bend you over.

If you service your own or the car is older, Japanese cars are normally simple to work on and everything comes undone as thought went into a practical vehicle for a long service life, not a fashion statement that only has to last till the second the warranty expires.

Boring?, hardly.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - 475TBJ

gordonbennet. I don't find shutting a tinny Auris door satisfying.

unthrottled, 'but it ain't the most practical car in its class' That's true my friend.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - madf

Agree with these posts, there's nothing more satisfying that just opening the door and climbing in and the door shuts lightly like nearly all Japanese cars do, you turn the key, the car fires up, it doesn't cough or splutter, its never heard of breaking down, everything works and continues to do so, annual service dealer visit only and whilst there he doesn't bend you over.

If you service your own or the car is older, Japanese cars are normally simple to work on and everything comes undone as thought went into a practical vehicle for a long service life, not a fashion statement that only has to last till the second the warranty expires.

Boring?, hardly.

+1

European cars - Time to be Controversial - tony g



(I agree Tony G.  idiots do buy emotionally.)

Ethan ,asian saloons hatchbacks, where's the passion ,the involvement .The driveability

Do you only buy your clothes in grey .most modern Japanese cars are the equivalent .Functional but not involving.

which Japanese car can offer the feel and drive of a modern golf or polo ?

If asian cars are so good, why do they sell so few in the Uk .

I worked for lexus when they were introduced to the Uk in 89.

We believed that they would soon displace mercedes and BMW as the must have brand. It never happened ,why, because car buying is a largely emotional process.

Incidentally I came across very few idiots with £40k to spend.

Tony g
European cars - Time to be Controversial - primeradriver
(I agree Tony G. idiots do buy emotionally.) Ethan ,asian saloons hatchbacks, where's the passion ,the involvement .The driveability Do you only buy your clothes in grey .most modern Japanese cars are the equivalent .Functional but not involving. which Japanese car can offer the feel and drive of a modern golf or polo ? If asian cars are so good, why do they sell so few in the Uk . I worked for lexus when they were introduced to the Uk in 89. We believed that they would soon displace mercedes and BMW as the must have brand. It never happened ,why, because car buying is a largely emotional process. Incidentally I came across very few idiots with £40k to spend. Tony g

This is such a load of rubbish.

Feel in a Polo? Don't make me laugh. It's the motoring equivalent of beige.

Forget the premium German stuff for a second -- name me one thing about a typical French car, VW/Skoda/Seat, Fiat, Vauxhall or Ford that even remotely resembles "passion"! Most of them are horrible.

Dull and unreliable? No wonder Renault's sales figures have fallen by 60% in the last five years.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - 475TBJ

'This is such a load of rubbish.'

tony g is correct. Lexus you never see. If people wanted them you'd see them but you don't, much like Infiniti, Renault, Saab, Subaru (bit of passion.................NOT much).

Horrible is too disparaging, disdainful,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,yuk!

European cars - Time to be Controversial - RT

Lexus doesn't work as a brand, in the UK or Europe, at least not in the way that Toyota wanted and not in the way it works very successfully in the USA.

You have to have some passion to buy/run a Subaru just to accept their lack of convention - now if they made more practical cars I'd go back to one.

Edited by RT on 03/01/2012 at 14:41

European cars - Time to be Controversial - primeradriver

'This is such a load of rubbish.'

tony g is correct. Lexus you never see. If people wanted them you'd see them but you don't, much like Infiniti, Renault, Saab, Subaru (bit of passion.................NOT much).

Horrible is too disparaging, disdainful,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,yuk!

You will note that I didn't actually address his point about Lexuses.

Yes, if you pay a *lot* of money you'll get a car with some serious engineering. That is not in question.

It was his comment about a Polo, a *POLO* for Christ's sake, being in some way exciting that I was flagging.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - tony g
Primera driver.

(This is such a load of rubbish.)

I've worked in the car trade for thirty years ,does that qualify me to know what motivates a car buyer.?

Let me add that I'm not anti Asian ,I worked for both lexus and Toyota .

Im not biased against Asian Cars ,30 years ago they had something to offer ,reliability, certainly ,but the styling was better then .the corolla from 25 years ago was better looking than the current stodgy offering.The mk2 MR2 was a superb car, entirely an emotional purchase ?

Again I would say if Asian cars are such a good buy ,why dont they dominate the Market in the Uk.

Their dull cars for dull people.

Finally look at the year to date % sales figures for new cars.

Vw without Audi skoda etc ,sells more cars than any two Japanese manufacturers. So it's not just about price and logical decisions.

Volkswagen 9.22
BMW. 5.91
Mercedes. 4.21


Nissan 4.95
Toyota 3.72
Honda. 2.63
Hyundai 3.2

Tony g



European cars - Time to be Controversial - Auristocrat

It is probably unjust to compare the year to date figures, as Japanese car production, and thus sales, was badly affected firstly by the earthquake in Japan and secondly by floods in Thailand, etc. For example Honda cut their UK production due to problems getting parts fron Japan.

Edited by Auristocrat on 03/01/2012 at 15:25

European cars - Time to be Controversial - jamie745

I love this bizarre reverse-snobbery on here which means if you dont buy a Skoda Octavia you must therefore be a badge snob idiot.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - Auristocrat

Autocar recently published sales market share figures comparing 2006 with 2011:

Alfa Romeo - 2006 0.22%, 2011 0.6%; Fiat - 2006 2.51%, 2011 2.23%; Chevrolet - 2006 0.61%, 2011 0.65%; Ford - 2006 14.69%, 2011 13.79%; Hyundai - 2006 1.52%, 2011 3.15%; Citroen - 2006 4.08%, 2011 3.54%; Nissan 2006 2.95%, 2011 4.97%; Kia - 2006 1.53%, 2011 2.8%; Renault - 2006 5.89%, 2011 3.51%; Skoda - 2006 1.65%, 2011 2.32%; Mazda - 2006 2.12%, 2011, 1.62%; Toyota - 2006 5.02%, 2011 3.74%; Mercedes 2006 3.46%, 2011 4.23%; Vauxhall - 2006 12.87%, 2011 12.02%; Peugeot - 2006 6.15%, 2011 4.96%; VW - 2006 8.1%, 2011 9.26%; Landrover - 2006 1.82%, 2011 1.91%; Volvo - 2006 1.3%, 2011 1.68%; BMW - 2006 4.93%, 2011 5.99%; Honda - 2006 4.17%, 2011 2.65%.

As mentioned previously Japanese production (both cars and car parts) were affected by the Tsunami, floods, etc - affecting car production elsewhere.

Toyota has recently said they will be increasing production by 20% in the next year. Honda is increasing production at Swindon from 100,000 to 180,000 in 2012 - with the addition of a new model (their Qashquai competitor) by adding another shift and 500 jobs.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - tony g
Auristocrat,

Natural distasters in Asia don't really account for the failure by Japanese manufacturers to make inroads into the Uk markets.

I know it's boring but the figures below show very little difference from 2011

They show % figures ytd for 2009 up to dec.

Honda 3.75
Toyota. 5.16
Hyundai 2.84
Nissan 3.9

Vw 8.08
Merc 3.62
BMW 4.95

I use these specific details to confirm that Uk car buying is not just about price.

Ford and vauxhall as a product would be more of a comparison,however
If you were to use ford vauxhall % Market share, the difference in sales would be really marked.The idea that the fleet discount Market accounts for the disparity doesn't really wash.Toyota and nissan have been trying to make
inroads into the fleet Market for years.

Tony g
European cars - Time to be Controversial - primeradriver

So you don't actually have an answer as to what makes a workaday Eurobox "passionate" then?

Which was the crux of my earlier post....

European cars - Time to be Controversial - primeradriver

The interesting thing is that the "passionate" buyer apparently buys German cars.....

Errr, I thought German cars were supposed to be "straight", and the French/Italians "charismatic" in this badge-obsessed fairyland?

I have never once, in all my years of asking, had a meaningful answer to this simple question regarding what makes an everyday European box any more interesting than a Japanese (or even Korean, frankly) one.

(I should probably point out that I currently own a "dynamic, excellent-to-drive, interesting" Ford Focus MK2 which is about as interesting as wallpaper paste, and a huge step backwards dynamically from the P11 Primera I had previously).

Edited by primeradriver on 03/01/2012 at 16:30

European cars - Time to be Controversial - dieseldogg

Right,

First off I got a bit of a "thing" for Germanic engeering, and if their cars were/are as well built & durable as the wife..............................?

btw,She, the wife is more than reliable too.

Second, Iffen ( & I do) one wanted a decent diesel, it had to be European, Fiat, Renault, VW, or even a Mercedes.

All the Aisan stuff was petrol, petrol, petrol, petrol, or a second rate diesel.

Third, I rate potential reliability very highly, but it must be permed with driving position & room & comfort & safety & not least............................................ MPG's

Forth , hard harsh plastics are distinctly offputting, no matter how long they last, just a wee bit snobby in that respect. And leather on the twiddly bits is nice as well.

Fifth, Our diesel VW Galaxy was actually very reliable in all respects, the only glitch being a poor starter motor arrangment ( per local elect indie)

Sixth, The 3 series BMW is a mere "go-cart", not a proper 4 seater at all. I would not consider owt smaller than a 5 Series to be a proper Car.

I am in absolutly no way brand influenced, well I am influenced but not blindly or unknowingly.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - RT
I am in absolutly no way brand influenced, well I am influenced but not blindly or unknowingly.

So what's your take on the all-new Asian-built diesel engines designed/developed in Germany?

The Hyundai/Kia R-series 2.2 and 2.0 diesels have been out since late 2009 - too new to assess long-term reliability but performing well so far.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - 475TBJ

primeradriver, drive an Alfa and then drive a Toyota, if you haven't, well............

European cars - Time to be Controversial - bonzo dog

Personally I can't figure out why some people are "passionate" about cars but they are, & each to their own.

What does amuse me though, is how some people seem to think their passion must be a bit daft by making up lots of other reasons as to their choice of brand - "reliability", "drives better", a "better car" etc.

The main reason people choose BMWs is because they want to own / drive / have parked outside their house a BMW, ditto Audis, VWs, Land Rovers, Mercedes, Alfas etc. There's nowt wrong with this so why do these people not simply say this?

European cars - Time to be Controversial - tony g
Primera driver,
German cars, straight,never heard one described as that,
Well engineered,solid build quality,involving to drive.heard all of those.

Still not heard the answer ,why don't Asian cars sell in greater numbers than more expensive premium cars from Germany. Perhaps the reason is the world is full of fools except me and thee.?

And then the p11 primera ,that's so much better than a focus.? It's genetically a bluebird,the equivalent of a sleeping tablet in motoring terms.
Primera, much loved by private hire drivers ,second hand it was cheap,had lots of room,it didn't matter it drove like a barge ,had a crude noisy engine and transmission.it kept going.

Primera,ideal for a man who given a free choice would prefer a timex to a rolex.

Tony g
European cars - Time to be Controversial - bonzo dog

Hi Tony, You've already answered your question

why don't Asian cars sell in greater numbers than more expensive premium cars from Germany

quite correctly as you know

because car buying is a largely emotional process

As regards the Primera I would suggest that "ideal for the man who simply wants to buy a watch rather than a statement which keeps good time", is perhaps a little more accurate?

European cars - Time to be Controversial - tony g
Bonzo,
Agree entirely .

Tony g
European cars - Time to be Controversial - Auristocrat

When it was introduced in 1996, the P11 Primera offered multi link front and rear suspension - unique in its class. With the P11, Nissan undertook to win the British Toring Car Championship within three years - and succeeded by taking both the manufacturers and team titles in 1998. An independent team, with factory backing, also took the BTCC Independent Cup in both 1999 and 2000.

I had a new Primera SX - introduced to celebrate the 1998 BTCC victories, and it was an absolute peach in terms of handling, etc, and coupled with 100% reliability. Genetically the Primera had more in common with the Nissan Auster/Stanza - rather than the Bluebird.

Whereas, I suppose the Focus traces it's genetic lineage back to something like the Anglia, Popular and Prefect. Or should it be to the original Ford Escort - a version of the Ford Thames van with side windows and rear seats?

European cars - Time to be Controversial - RT

When it was introduced in 1996, the P11 Primera offered multi link front and rear suspension - unique in its class.

You may have read too much from Nissan PR handouts - the 1995 Opel/Vauxhall Vectra-B had multi-link suspension all round - so the Primera was hardly unique - of course the Ford Sierra had independent suspension all round from 1982.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - Auristocrat

Info re suspension taken fro Wiipedia

European cars - Time to be Controversial - primeradriver
Primera driver, German cars, straight,never heard one described as that, Well engineered,solid build quality,involving to drive.heard all of those. Still not heard the answer ,why don't Asian cars sell in greater numbers than more expensive premium cars from Germany. Perhaps the reason is the world is full of fools except me and thee.? And then the p11 primera ,that's so much better than a focus.? It's genetically a bluebird,the equivalent of a sleeping tablet in motoring terms. Primera, much loved by private hire drivers ,second hand it was cheap,had lots of room,it didn't matter it drove like a barge ,had a crude noisy engine and transmission.it kept going. Primera,ideal for a man who given a free choice would prefer a timex to a rolex. Tony g

You are continually falling into the trap of comparing workaday Japanese cars to premium German ones.

There is nothing particularly well engineered about the likes of the Golf, Polo or Passat. Nothing particularly involving about them either.

And Primera genetically a Bluebird? This tells me all I need to know. You might as well say that the Focus is genetically an Escort (now *there* was a dull car!).

The Primera wasn't bought for involvement. But it *is* a better car to drive than the MK2 Focus which is, frankly, offensively boring to drive. It's also significantly better to drive than the contemporary late-1990s VW Passat which was tedious to the point of inducing sleep.

I get it -- you're a BMW salesman.

As for the comment about Alfas vs Toyotas -- I get Alfas. You could say the same re Alfa vs VW, although it must be said that the latest Alfas are pretty and that's it.

Still no comment about what exactly makes a cheap Eurobox so involving I notice.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - Auristocrat

Having bought new cars at full fleet discount myself (e.g 17.5% off, plus a further 4%, plus free metallic paint, plus three years fleet breakdown cover), I am aware that price is only one factor in buying a car.

The example I picked up on (where another poster said that the Avensis was more expensive than the Vectra), I added to by saying that the Vectra suffers from oversupply (caused by heavy discounting and large numbers being sold to fleets). The Avensis doesn't suffer to the same extent (partly because it hasn't been sold in the same numbers to fleets and has not been as heavily discounted to acheive fleet sales), and tends to be more expensive as a used buy. Supply and demand - Vectras are plentiful on the used car market as shedloads have been sold to fleets, and they don't command high prices as a result of oversupply.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - corax
which Japanese car can offer the feel and drive of a modern golf or polo ?
If asian cars are so good, why do they sell so few in the Uk . I worked for lexus when they were introduced to the Uk in 89. We believed that they would soon displace mercedes and BMW as the must have brand. It never happened ,why, because car buying is a largely emotional process. Incidentally I came across very few idiots with £40k to spend. Tony g

I think one of the reasons that they don't sell many here is that they are out of touch with peoples wants. I love Japanese cars for their toughness and reliability but they rarely get the package right, at least in the larger car sectors as GB hints at.

Honda Accord - Reliable as a swiss watch but only made as a saloon or a huge ungainly estate (2003-08). New Honda Accord very pricy. I would like an Accord hatchback, but no joy.

Honda Civic - Nice big hatchback but bad ride quality. I would like a Civic estate. No joy.

Toyota Auris - Hit with an ugly stick, and doesn't have the reliablity of the Corolla.

New Toyota Avensis - only made as saloon or estate.

Kia, Hyundai - supremely reliable but the interior materials may put people off.

Lexus - No practical hatchbacks and only one diesel that is ridiculously overgeared in the earlier models.

As for being fun to drive, you have great choices in the form of Subaru Impreza's, Mitsubishis Evo's and the like but they are pretty expensive to run.

I have a Japanese car myself and it doesn't put a foot wrong mechanically or electrically, but on a summers morning, I look at it and wish I had something more exciting to drive.

Many of the European offerings offer a more exciting drive in the more 'middle of the road' affordable sector, cars from the VAG stable, BMW, Alfa Romeo and Ford. But they don't always combine that with reliability or build quality. OK for people with dealer warranty remaining but I can only afford cars that are a bit older.

This thread just highlights that one persons priorities in a car are different to someone elses. No wrong choice.

In the end you don't get the perfect car otherwise people wouldn't keep changing.

Edited by corax on 03/01/2012 at 18:43

European cars - Time to be Controversial - jamie745

So am i a tool because i didnt buy a dull boring Japanese car?

European cars - Time to be Controversial - madf

So am i a tool because i didnt buy a dull boring Japanese car?

well yes, but we did not like to tell you :-)

European cars - Time to be Controversial - Bobbin Threadbare

So am i a tool because i didnt buy a dull boring Japanese car?

well yes, but we did not like to tell you :-)

*Laughs head off*

European cars - Time to be Controversial - sirionman

I am not an emotional buyer - I am cured - but I still have emotions. I have bought several Euro cars, some of them new, and I have been horribly let down. Another reason I have drifted away from Euro cars is from having spent 25 years down-under where predominently cars are Asian, and it opened my eyes to just how really good they were. My first was a beat-up Datsun 120Y station wagon, which did over 250,000 miles and never let me down. From there I was hooked on Japanese cars, and then to any Asian car. I can honestly say I never broke down with an Asian car, and nor did I have niggly faults.

Down-under where distances are huge, pragmatism takes over from ego very quickly. I rarely saw a Jeep or Land Rover away from the cities - just too unpredictable. "Image" down-under is the image of being busted down a very long way from home. The UK car market is obviously different but I have had my persepctive altered and recognise that Asian cars do have lower probability of failiure to Euro cars. It is a fact.

Living back in UK now, the emotions that people invest in buying a car does puzzle me a lot. Surely a reliable vehicle is better to own than one less reliable? But I suppose that is the essence of emotion buying - it is like having faith I suppose.

However it is actually possible to satisfy the emotional side of the car image with an Asian car. It is a question of opening up to the possibiity - just take a look at the new Toyota GT86. OK that is an extreme example, but please don't tell me that the Asians don't make some awesomely handsome and inspiring cars, because they do. They really do.

As for my Sirion 1.5SX, I invite you to take a close look one day. It is a very, very quick and exciting car to drive and it has all the bells and whistles. Personally I like the look too. This car is also light years ahead of what Skoda/Seat/VW are about to offer with their impoverished Citigo/Mii/Up hatchback. Personally I don't want to see paint on the inside of my door panels, which is what you get with the new offering - I last saw that on my Ford Anglia in 1972. Just take a look at the back seat to on the new Citigo/Mii/Up - my Sirion is luxurious compared to that.

Beauty is only skin deep. And the ugliness of an unreliable car goes right to the bone.

Regards.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - corax

Down-under where distances are huge, pragmatism takes over from ego very quickly. I rarely saw a Jeep or Land Rover away from the cities - just too unpredictable. "Image" down-under is the image of being busted down a very long way from home. The UK car market is obviously different but I have had my persepctive altered and recognise that Asian cars do have lower probability of failiure to Euro cars. It is a fact.

Very true sirionman. An Australian workmate of mine will say the same. He has a Ford Mondeo as a family wagon but uses a battered Nissan Micra for work. 170000 miles and still going. No faults, just regular oil changes. It's become an experiment now as to how long it will go before it croaks :)

European cars - Time to be Controversial - Avant

I think Bonzo Dog gets nearest to the truth (about halfway up the thread):

"The main reason people choose BMWs is because they want to own / drive / have parked outside their house a BMW, ditto Audis, VWs, Land Rovers, Mercedes, Alfas etc. There's nowt wrong with this so why do these people not simply say this?"

There are so many different factors which influence car buying: here are some, in no particular order: reliability; size; acceleration; safety; 'passion'; ability to excite on twisty B-roads; comfort; interior quality; proven engineering; versatility; luggage / people space; stylish to look at; brand loyalty; previous experience; good local dealer etc.etc.

If each one of us put these in order of our own priorities, I'm confident that we'd all come up with a different order. And a good thing too. That's why, thank goodness, manufacturers still make cars that don't all look and perform the same (as is the case with white goods, where the list would read simply cost and performance).


European cars - Time to be Controversial - focussed

When I spend my own money buying a car I want a properly engineered and manufactured vehicle that the manufacturer will support.

When I turn the key I want it to start and when it starts I don't want a cryptic display of warning lights telling me that various parts of it won't work today.

I want a car that has been designed and manufactured by engineers, not value engineered down to a price by bean counters.

That's why I have a Honda.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - tony g
Avant,


(There are so many different factors which influence car buying: here are some, in no particular order: reliability; size; acceleration; safety; 'passion'; ability to excite on twisty B-roads; comfort; interior quality; proven engineering; versatility; luggage / people space; stylish to look at; brand loyalty; previous experience; good local dealer etc.etc.)

Summed the whole thing up in 5 lines ,excellent.

The thing that winds me up about this whole debate is the perverse arrogance of individuals like sirionman ,the op.
His delight in pontificating the joys ! Of sirion ownership or primera ownership or whatever are unreal.

Then again, he only posted the once.Is this whole thing a spoof ? Designed to excite the likes of primera man and me .?

It's the only thing that makes any sense in this thread.

Tony g






European cars - Time to be Controversial - Trilogy

For me the badge doesn't come into it. If the car does what I want at the time, I'll buy it. This explains why I've owned, amongst others, a 1990 Nissan Micra 1.0, Subaru Legacy 2.2 GX estate, Renault 5, Citroen Dyane, 3 Toyota Corollas (including GT), a couple of Alfas, Lancia Fulvia Coupe, Skoda Octavia TDi and a W124 diesel estate............next car could be a Peugeot, Audi, Toyota, BMW, Mercedes, Skoda..........

European cars - Time to be Controversial - barney100

Japanese cars are seemingly very reliable. I feel most are overpriced and don't have the solid feel of many european cars..with a few exceptions. Mate just got a Qasquai and paid £28,000. £28k to me seems BMW MERC AUDI JAG land.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - Trilogy

barney 100, although they don't feel as solid (I think the steel must be thinner) they appear to do well in NCAP tests.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - Collos25

And for what it is a renault at heart.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - RT

£28k is Freelander money - but then I think they're overpriced as well!

European cars - Time to be Controversial - Auristocrat

BMW, Audi and Mercedes territory starts at around £ 16K (with the exception of the Audi A1 which is from about £13K). Presumably your mate has a high spec Qashqai or Qashqai +2 - £28K is near the top end for one of these.

Although Japanese products have been affected by the high cost of the Yen (the main reason Daihatsu is pulling out of Europe), list prices compare favourably.

Incidentally, BBC News reported today that Nissan Sunderland produced 480,485 vehicles in 2011 - 14% up on 2010 and a new record for a single UK car plant. Just over 300,000 Qashqai's were produced last year at Sunderland, and Nissan is now Britain's biggest car exporter.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - tony g
Auristocrat
It's brilliant that Nissan and possibly other Japanese manufacturers are doing so well in producing cars in the Uk,presumably for export.We need the work and the exports.

Given that they are Uk made and largely French owned ,why don't Nissan have a bigger share of the Uk market ?

Tony g

European cars - Time to be Controversial - Auristocrat

The Renault/Nissan structure is that of an alliance with each company having their own corporate structures, rather than one company owning the other. Renault have an approx 44% share in Nissan, and Nissan a 15% share in Renault.

As regards their market share in the UK, their market share in 2011 was 4.95%, and this is an increase from previous years. They currently have a larger UK Market share than the individual UK market shares of Fiat, Hyundai, Citroen, Peugeot, Renault, Skoda, Mazda, Mercedes, Toyota and Honda.

In comparison with some of manufacturers named above, I don't think they are doing badly at all re UK market share. I know they are planning European expansion (rather than just UK expansion) with a view to overtaking Toyota in Europe.

European cars - Time to be Controversial - 2.0Tsi
""Just over 300,000 Qashqai's were produced last year ""

Yeah and about 200,000 are motability cars ! ;)