Motor Ins Policy Holders...why are some crooks? - Ethan Edwards

Created as a response to the Insurance companies -spivs and cheaters thread.

Crash for cash scammers...

http://www.blackburncitizen.co.uk/news/9366645.Blackburn_gang_of_six_jailed_for_crash_for_cash_scam/

People prepared to even kill their beloved pets to defraud some money.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/pets/8886166/Owners-killing-their-pets-to-get-insurance-payouts.html

http://www.postonline.co.uk/post/news/2122496/abi-updates-scale-impact-whiplash-epidemic-uk

and whiplash......add in dodgy lawyers...24/7 slip trip claim adverts on Sky TV and it's not a pretty picture is it.

and how many times have you heard the phrase..well it's X for cash or Y if it's an Insurance job.

How many people do you know who 'pad' their claim...pretend to have lost expensive goods on Travel Insurance that they either never owned or lost in other circumstances.

People who lie about whose the main driver of a car, or where they really live to get a cheaper premium eh?

Come on be honest.

These are NOT victimless crimes people...there is no such thing.

Insurance fraud costs the companies £350 million pounds a year. Now who do you think has to pay that lot back?

So I think we can say that there would appear to be a 'case for the prosecution' on both sides of this argument.

Motor Ins Policy Holders...why are some crooks? - injection doc

Well its no suprise ! 18 weeks is a joke ! 10 years it should of been.

they will be out doing it again in a few weeks under a different name !

Motor Ins Policy Holders...why are some crooks? - danidge

Fair comment-but there are also many genuine and honest people out there who do not have the mindset or desire to defraud insurers.

I view it slightly differently. To me insurers seem to adopt the position that all claimants are on the fiddle......and they are not.

Insurers also do not treat claimants with respect,,,,,,,,arrogance, prevarication, procrastination all occur

Insurers operate via call centres with staff frequently trained to a minimal standard. These staff function via cribsheets, prompters and cribsheets. They become archetypal Little Britain............"the computer says no".

Insurers try it on when offering to settle claims........they treat claimants as stupid and insult their intelligence.

Insurers sell the claim details to the the ambulance chasers, they are thus encouraging the false whiplash claims.

In my case (on my recent post) the legal folk say the hit and run driver did the right thing by not stopping and exchanging details. Why? Because it will minimise administration for the insurers. This mindset is encouring fraud and criminality.

Enough said. What do others think?

Motor Ins Policy Holders...why are some crooks? - justadriver

In the case of my insurance who did nothing but drag their feet until they got a whiplash claim, and then sent an investigator who inspected my car to see if there was a worn tyre or it wasn't taxed, and only then discussed the accident and went to the scene and took a formal statement, It is hard for me to think other than they were not interested until i told them i had renewed elsewhere, not costing me any more, allowing for loss of ncd and that if they didn't care neither would I. At that point the suitably outraged customer services manager (yes i got that far) suddenly e-mailed me to remind me of my duty to assist them in refuting the 3rd party claim. and finally they wrote to the 3rd party to insist that if they wished to proceed they MUST issue court proceedings.

I pay my road tax on time, i insure my car, I declare everything purposely and keep copies of online forms and e-mails, and guess what, I am treated no better than if I was on t'fiddle.

I am sure that the vast majority of people are honest in their insurance declarations, certainly not the 50% fraudulent that the manager claimed.

Motor Ins Policy Holders...why are some crooks? - gordonbennet
''Enough said. What do others think?''



That might well be the normal experience with many insurers.

It could not possibly be further from my experiences of dealing and claiming from NFU, there you are a personal customer and the local office form a relationship of mutual trust with you.

Total honesty and straight dealing are the order of the day, but then i deal in that way myself so maybe they learn who their customers are.

I had a total loss write off when SWMBO wrote of my Landcruiser, they paid me out over top book due to the first class pre accident condition (all on engineers report), no haggling and cheque virtually the next day.

We had a lightning strike nearby which took out a number of electrical goods, no visit no haggling, i replaced the goods with equivalents and they paid me out after receiving the receipts.

No crafty upgrades by me, no extra items that i felt like renewing.

Honour is a fast disappearing word in this country, not surprsing really, few would know what it was if it bit them, look at our motley snouts in the trough politicians for proof of that, you can buy Honours but you can't buy honour.

There are insurance companies that still deal the old way, you have to find them and they won't be the cheapest and they probably won't feature on some comparison site.




Edited by gordonbennet on 17/11/2011 at 01:57

Motor Ins Policy Holders...why are some crooks? - dieseldogg
Gordonbennet! Gordonbennet
Right on the money with your thoughts as above.
I heartily concur.
Ps
I bes with the UFU/NFU too, a local office, with real & decent staff.
Cost a %age more, but I feel money well spent.
If one is going to bother spending on insurance, better to do it right.
Motor Ins Policy Holders...why are some crooks? - RT

NFU must be good for their customers - they're totally obstructive and time-wasting if you claim against one of their drivers.

Motor Ins Policy Holders...why are some crooks? - dieseldogg
Ah!
A most excellent attitude old boy, I am glad they are working, quite properly, on my behalf, and I dare say for other UFU Policy holders too..
Cheers
M
Motor Ins Policy Holders...why are some crooks? - Roly93

Quite agree with this post, well done.

My only real gripe with insurance companies is how hard they are on young drivers, other than this they are in a state of constant war with low-lifes thinking up new scams to defraud them !

"Oh I need a new sofa, never mind I'll just spill something on this one and claim for a new suite for xmas" !

Motor Ins Policy Holders...why are some crooks? - happy polo

It's sadly true that the first thing most insurers will do is try and find a way to wriggle out of paying up, however straight you might have been with them. I can appreciate that there is a multitude of fraud out there, but much of it could be quashed if the industry would just get together and get some measures put in place. Anybody found guilty of any form of insurance fraud - and I mean intentional fraud, not just insignificant oversights - should be refused any further insurance for life. Driving without cover would then effectively mean that you will never legally drive a car ever again. Two strikes should result in an immediate prison sentence. The practise of fines which add up to less than a year's cover is truly pathetic and needs arresting sooner rather than later.

The same condition should apply to fraudulent injury claims and staged accidents. What would also help is a legal obligation to carry one's driving licence at all times when in charge of a vehicle, and produce it to the other party at the scene of an accident. No licence would mean the police being called, and the popular scam of crashing somebody else's car into innocent road users would become far more likely to result in detection.

Legislation is required urgently to stop the national sham of injury claims, with an obvious solution being for the claimant to stand the risk of their legal costs in the event of a failure to win the case. Trading in the telephone numbers of crash 'victims' needs to be banned. The ever popular 'whiplash' needs to be declared an injury of no consequence for which compensation is not applicable. Take a few days off work and get on with it, it won't kill you. Indeed, any alleged injury which mysteriously fails to show up at the time should be treated with the upmost scepticism. We need to move away from the mentality that any time another member of the human race coughs or sneezes we are entitled to be compensated. Accidents happen and are a risk we wilfully accept when travelling by car. I for one would have no problems with non-serious injuries not being 'compensatable' if it kept my premiums down. You could always walk, fly or travel by train instead.

I tend to feel that most of the opportunisitc fraud is related to household insurance, and apparently pets, and I can't help conclude that if it was really that bad then insurers would simply pull out of these markets. Instead, we see them desperately begging for our business at every opportunity. They are cearly continuing to earn money, and no doubt plenty of it, which does beg the question of whether it's really quite as bad as they'd like us all to believe.

Edited by happy polo on 18/11/2011 at 09:04