I could not agree more with the above, and was shocked that the amount in hire car charges over 2 months was about 60% of the new retail price of the hire car if I continued to use it. The legal expenses company is part of the insurance company, and places an obvious emphasis on car hire provision.
However not sure if this applies:-
www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/techni...5
"If the policyholder did not hire a car, we might require the insurer to pay compensation for other reasonable transport expenses incurred plus inconvenience caused by lack of a car.
- If we award compensation for inconvenience caused by lack of a car, we tend to award around £10 per day, if it had a material effect on the policyholder, and depending on the individual circumstances – for example, whether the policyholder had "free" access to another vehicle, availability of public transport etc."
From the above is it correct that the transport expenses plus inconvenience can be claimed? Reading other comments up to £15 per day can be claimed in inconvenience as the rate is variable (see above), as the cost to own the written-off car is multiplies of a normal car this is probably fair? Nowhere in the policies did it state the day rate, the most cost effective transport has been used wherever possible mainly tube and trains though this has worked out just under £1000 for 2 months.
What I am trying to cover is the maintenance/depreciation ownership cost of the car over 2 months (until the cheque was issued), and transportation costs incurred through no fault of my own accident to get partly back into a position before the accident.
Thanks for you assistance in this matter.
Edited by richard_b on 11/12/2010 at 06:50
|