"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Mapmaker
So often people say, on here, how pleased they are with their tyres. What's that all about then? Some thoughts:

1. Snow tyres; yes, you can tell when you're well shod with snow tyres, I agree.

2. "Grippy" - if (save on ice) you start to lose grip, you're going far, far, far too fast.

3. Life. I remain to be convinced that you can measure the life of a tyre in most ordinary circumstances.


I can honestly say I have never, ever, noticed the effect of changing my tyres. Whether budget, second hand, premium or brand new. Does this make me a poor driver, a cautious driver, or merely immune to marketing?
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Statistical outlier
I have noticed a large difference between tyres. The OEM Yokohamas that came on my Accord tramlined horribly, the Pirelli's that I replaced them with didn't, and the Michelin's that replaced them have been really hard to balance.

Life is easy to measure - how long do they last before you need to replace them.

Likewise, grip is very noticeable the first time you need to make an unexpected manoeuvre in the wet on a roundabout

I think there is a difference, but from my recent experience, the 'premium' brand has not been as good as the middle tier (or is that unfair on Pirelli?).
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Ian (Cape Town)
Obviously if you replace worn tyres for new, you'll notice an immediate difference.
I've had budget brands which have been exceptional in some areas, and rubbish at others.
Tyres must be measured by a number of factors. Depends what you are looking for: Longevity, grip, wet weather performance etc etc etc.
All relative, really, and one will compromise another.

As far as your YOKOs went, they probably tramlined because of a stiffer sidewall. A bad thing? Maybe not, in other circumstances.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Statistical outlier
Ian, completely agree, on fast, smooth A roads the Yoko's were great. Just the wrong compromise for day to day driving for me.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - craig-pd130
Likewise, I've noticed big differences in grip, ride, comfort etc between tyre brands.

My old Passat had Conti SportContacts as factory fit. Excellent grip but noisy on motorways and made ride a bit harsh ... lasted 33,000 miles on the fronts.

Replaced with Vredestein Sportracs -- much quieter on the road, softer ride but the car understeered a LOT more and dry grip was worse. I suspect the carcass was softer, allowing the tyre to deform more when cornering. They only lasted 18,000 on the front.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - happytorque
Tyres differ wildly in my experience. Noise, grip, comfort levels, white lining...there are some vastly different performers available. And I can definately notice the changes. Some of the cheaper brands are truely dreadful. So yes Mr Mapmaker, im surprised that you can't tell one tyre from another! ;o)
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - colinh
Is this addressed to Mr Glock?
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Mapmaker
>>Life is easy to measure - how long do they last before you need to replace them.

Of course. Sorry, what I was trying to say - but didn't - was that I am unconvinced that you can compare the lives of two different tyres very easily.

Eagle F1 - Blue {P}
A few months ago I replaced the cheap Chinese front tyres that came with my car for Goodyear Eagle F1's and noticed an immediate and marked improvement in the drive, the car didn't wander as much and seemed to go in a much straighter line, also grip improved dramatically in the wet.

In fact, grip improved so much that I then found that my FWD Mondeo would actually oversteer rather than understeer if pushing on in the wet, I realised this was a problem when totally unexpectedly the back end overtook the front end one day, never had that with FWD before!

I changed the two rear tyres for matching Eagles this week despite there been lots of tread left and I have to say it's improved the car again, it feels like a normal FWD in the wet again and I have much more confidence in it. I also find it's now totally straight on the motorway, the old tyres were slightly iffy it seems and I'm glad to be shot of them.

Edited by Blue {P} on 07/11/2008 at 15:41

Eagle F1 - BobbyG
I am with Mapmaker on most of this. I have noticed before when a new tyre was quieter than the one it replaced. But maybe that would be true of any tyre with more tread than its predecessor? Also through getting new tyres you get the wheels re balanced so it may well be previous were out of balance and the improvement is nothing to do with the tyres themselves?

Also agree re grip, if you are noticing under/oversteer then maybe you are taking that corner too fast, again something I tend not to do. I do admit however, especially on a large roundabout near me that I will sometimes go round this fast, when road empty, just to establish the limit of adhesion but I would never do that in normal driving..

I read a tyre test in Auto Express a few months ago and basically the majority of the tests were irrelevent to my day to day driving. Chicanes, emergency stops etc. Can't remember the last time I had to do an emergency stop!

When I had my vrS , it had Eagles on it and the forums all said these were the tyres to go for but they were costly. Then another thread, similar to this popped up with the "I was skint and had to buy Kumos and am delighted with them" Before long they became the suggested choice when anyone asked!

Question though, do all tyres have the exact same tread depth when new? If not its not fair to compare life of tyre is it?
Eagle F1 - Group B
2. "Grippy" - if (save on ice) you start to lose grip, you're going far, far, far too fast.



Doesnt have to be fast, I've had bad tyres slip in the wet at very sensible speeds, where a good tyre would grip with no fuss. You probably mean cornering grip on the limit but what about traction grip?

I had a puncture last year and due to circumstances had a single budget tyre fitted and used it for 3 weeks until I could get a pair of my preferred tyres. The budget tyre had notably less grip in the wet and I was happy to get back to my usual tyres.

Its not just down to price though, on a previous car I had some remoulds and the grip was amazing, I couldnt believe how good they were, felt so safe and confidence inspiring (these were modern CE-marked remoulds not the scary things of old). Perhaps the downside was the tread would have worn out in 8k miles, but I didnt keep the car long enough to find out.

I agree, its better to test grip when you know its safe to do so, so that you know the limits, instead of being in the dark about it.
Eagle F1 - Statistical outlier
"the majority of the tests were irrelevent to my day to day driving. Chicanes, emergency stops etc."

I had to do a combined emergency stop plus hard swerve the other day when a Chubb van pulled violently into my lane on the M6, apparently withoutlooking. The ABS kicked in, as did the stability program thing. As a result, I escaped unscathed, but I'm pretty sure that the limits of tyre adhesion were entirely relevant.
Eagle F1 - henry k
>>I have noticed before when a new tyre was quieter than the one it replaced.
But maybe that would be true of any tyre with more tread than its predecessor?

>>
I recently had a puncture ( in the side wall ) of a Fateo front tyre that was a third worn.
I decided to replace both fronts with Kumhos ( to match the new Kumhos on the back)
The reduction in noise was very very noticeable to the extent that SWMBO started complaining about "other" mechanical sounds in the car.
I do not believe in my case that the reduction in noise is other than the tyre design / construction.
( The Fateos were new when I bought the Mondeo four years ago so I was used to their noise but had no idea how bad it was.)

I am very impressed how quiet my standard 98 Mondeo saloon is compared with many other cars I have been in. e.g New Audi A4 and Polo Classic last month to name but two, both of which I drove extensively.
Eagle F1 - Manatee
Blue wrote -
A few months ago I replaced the cheap Chinese front tyres that came with my
car for Goodyear Eagle F1's

In fact grip improved so much that I then found that my FWD Mondeo would
actually oversteer rather than understeer if pushing on in the wet I realised this was
a problem when totally unexpectedly the back end overtook the front end one day never
had that with FWD before!


Blue's experience supports the policy that many tyre depots have, when they are only fitting two new tyres, that they must go on the back.

I have usually favoured putting the new tyres on the front of a FWD at this time of year, and I have never had a problem, but I have always had decent tyres of the same type on the back.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Lud

a poor driver, a cautious driver, or merely immune to marketing?


I would say it made you a very cautious driver, and perhaps a shade insensitive Mm. Since there are considerable differences between tyres in terms of all performance parameters, it isn't just marketing you are immune to but something of more practical importance: perhaps signals through the seat of your pants among other things?

I would also say that anyone whose car never, ever lost some grip at least on dry or ordinary wet roads is probably driving too slowly for their own amusement. Not that the rest of us have anything to complain about provided you don't hold things up...
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - jc2
"If you've never had an accident,you're not driving fast enough"-Mario Andretti.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - John S
Yes, you certainly can find differences. Vectra run to 80k miles. Originals Goodyear Eagles. No problem with grip right down to 2mm, fronts lasted 24k miles. Backs whined on some surfaces when part worn. Replaced fronts with Dunlop Sport. Dreadful. Lost wet road grip when part worn - traction control worked overtime. Lasted 28k miles. Full set of Michelin Pilots followed. Excellent, gripped to the last and much quieter than the Goodyears. Still on the car when sold.

JS
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - ForumNeedsModerating
I tend to agree Mapamaker. I've never bought cheapo tyres though - I don't really like to
experiement in that area - just different makes of 'premuim' tyres.
I must admit to being slightly amused sometimes by peoples' descriptions of handling nuance, wear, noise produced etc. , it seems they'd need to have the finely tuned senses (and courage) on an F1 driver in some performance comparisons.

I think an awful lot is down to 'new' versus 'old' - of course they'll be x,y,z better - they're new!! Another part, maybe, is just the "man thing"?

There may well measureable differences between really cheap & really expensive tyres, which I'm sure specialised test scenarios could detect & quantify - but for most situations between those extremes, I'm dubious.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Lud
it seems they'd need to have the finely tuned senses (and courage) on an F1 driver in some performance comparisons.


Not so really woodbines, or only on fast bends in the dry. Anyone can explore on-the-limit handling in any car in slow bends especially of course in wet conditions. I have always thought that if you didn't ever do that when the road was clear of other traffic just for the hell of it, you might well be a bit too slow and clumsy when an extreme situation arose on the road through no fault of yours.

Need I remind people that it is no consolation, when something untoward and perhaps expensive has taken place, that someone else was at fault? Much better to feel smug that your honed instinct may have saved some of your steed's metal...

Modern cars are cosseting, safe and reassuring. But that is no excuse not to be on top of them, just as you have to be with horses. But perhaps I'm just old-fashioned and barmy.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Ian (Cape Town)
>>But that is no excuse not to be
on top of them just as you have to be with horses.


Well, I can't actually imagine a way of riding a horse without being on top of one.

"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Lud
Don't be annoying Ian.

The only time I ever had truck with horses - spoilt fat large ponies, seldom ridden - their owner told me expansively that the thing to do was 'Give'im a good whack! Show'im who's boss!'

When I tentatively touched the animal's flank with a twig like whoever the tart-disguised-as-a-nun was in Clint Eastwood's Two Mules for Sister Sarah, it showed me who was boss by bolting all the way back into its stable, leaving me hanging unhurt from the beam over the door.

But I don't let cars do that sort of thing as a rule.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - ForumNeedsModerating
Anyone can explore on-the-limit handling in any car in slow bends especially of course in wet conditions.

Yes Lud, I'm sure they can - like I've done too - inadvertently. But the thing is - could you compare all those variable parameters, over time, between 2 (or more) different tyres.
The variables might include: different tread depths (from wear), different amounts of water, different line, different closing/braking speed, rain falling on previously dry road (hence more slippery), different tyre pressures, different load - the list goes on.

So, if the putative driver of your example, finds he/she skidded on a tyre A, but not on tyre B - would all the above have been factored in? I doubt it. More likely, they'd come onto an interent forum and say, 'Those tyre As are diabolical, I didn't get any grip in the wet at all, tyre Bs are fantastic though'.

They may feel they're telling the truth & contributing useful info, but I'm rather of the opinion it's more the need for commonality or to feel part of the discussion/'being in the swim', mostly - human nature, not in its worst form of course - just endearingly silly.


Much better to feel smug that your honed instinct may have saved some of your steed's metal...

Can't argue with that - always better to have honed skill at one's disposal than an empty locker. My dear old Dad was once a London Transport bus driver - early '50s era in RT series buses - and he told me about the Hendon(?) bus driver training school with its large skid pan, plenty big enough to get an RT doing 180 degree skids. I can see a very good argument for having something similar (maybe even compulsory) at learner drivers' disposal - heck, I'd even sigh up for a refresher course!
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Hamsafar
It's just like footwear really. They all suite different applications. Some tyres are like slippers, others are like hiking boots, some are like sensible leather lace-ups and others are like expensive running shoes plus permutations of all of the above.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - tyro
I'm with Mapmaker on this one, but I'm sure it is largely due to insensitivity on my part.

I don't even notice any real difference when I put my winter tyres on in December, and when I have the summer ones put on in the spring.

OK, I have noticed lack of grip in hard braking when my tyres were down near the limit, but other than that, I can't say I've noticed much difference.

The one place I would expect to notice a difference is in rolling resistance - i.e, since I keep a record of my fuel economy, I would expect that I might notice a difference when I changed between brands, or when I changed between summer and winter tyres, but to be honest, I don't.



By the way, what is the answer to BobbyG's question? "Question though, do all tyres have the exact same tread depth when new? "
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - gordonbennet
We all want different things from our vehicles, both our cars get driven enthusiastically at times, and there is a world of difference between good and bad tyres.

Maybe others don't but i want my cars to be able to take off rapidly on the turn with no drama or wheelspin wet or dry, anything less and the tyres come off, good job we're all different, of course sometimes that superb wet grip has a penalty, be it noise or ride quality and reduced tyre life.

I have recently removed perfectly good premium tyres from both our vehicles, the tyres on the MB would wheelspin far too easily when cold, and took several miles to become round (though they were very good warmed up), the original tyres on the pick up were simply not up to the job, and the vehicle felt too big for them if that makes any sense (also went up a size to the grey import size, good improvement).
I didn't wait until they were worn out, by then it may have been too late.

Lud's point about the seat of pants makes the point perfectly, there's a pleasure in the feel of a vehicle that is well planted on the road, i've been in far too many motors over the years that you just knew any sudden deviation of course would cause a major upset, don't you just hate that feeling when the steering goes superlight and it feels like you're driving a plate of spaghetti.

It may be old hat but last time i looked the tyres were the only thing touching the road.
It doesn't always have to be the top makes, often some less well known tyre makers make as good for much more reasonable price.

"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - ForumNeedsModerating
>>...the tyres on the MB would wheelspin far too easily when cold,

My w124 had ASR - from what I can gather, so should yours, so shouldn't spin its wheels under power - maybe it's not working.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - gordonbennet
My w124 had ASR - from what I can gather so should yours so shouldn't
spin its wheels under power - maybe it's not working.


Strange i know, but we actively sought one that didn't have the A/C, cruise, memory seats and climate control, unfortunately when they don't come with that lot ASR is usually missing as well and thats the one thing it could really have done with, though with good tyres its not needed so much obviously.

We had a 320 estate with all of the above and as it came with a full history i could see just how much the various failures especially of the climate had cost the previous owner over the years, some truly eye watering bills from the dealer, so i tend to avoid all sorts of unnecessary extras on any car if poss, but climate, especially with digi dash, is one i really don't want ever.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - ForumNeedsModerating
>>Strange i know, but we actively sought one that didn't have the A/C, cruise, memory seats >.and climate control, unfortunately when they don't come with that lot ASR is usually missing

Probably a very wise move GB. Although I never had problems with those sub-systems in my coupe, the w203 diesel I've bought subsequently (and still have) has had several electronic related & one/two 'physical' problems. Still miss the coupe (E220) - lovely compliant ride & surprisingly capable 150bhp engine, even pushing that solid lump along.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - gmac
I can honestly say I have never ever noticed the effect of changing my tyres.
Whether budget second hand premium or brand new. Does this make me a poor driver
a cautious driver or merely immune to marketing?

I don't know if the OP has always been an advocate of bangernomics or if that is a more recent thing?
If you are always buying higher mileage, older vehicles then new tyres may not be felt through shocks, suspension bushes etc... which have been the equivalent of six times around the equator. I don't know if anyone could really tell then.
You state in posts elsewhere to your car sometimes standing for several weeks or months on end without turning a wheel or venturing outside the M25 which could indicate low speed manoevering. Again not really testing any tyre.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Brian Tryzers
I might once have sided with Mapmaker too. My last two cars came on Pirelli P6000s and ended up on Michelin Pilots because that's what the leasing company got cheapest and I can't say I noticed the difference. But my current car - which I now betyre at my own expense - has gone in the last year from four P6000s to four Michelin Primacy HPs, and the effect has been transformative. Gone is the tendency to squirm alarmingly over rutted tarmac or even thick white lines; the steering is noticeably sharper; there's a little less road noise and it may even be using a little less fuel. The Michelins may cost more - by about £30 each in my size - but they're unquestionably worth the extra.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Peter C
I too have had all kinds of tyres on my cars and really have never noticed much difference. I remember a few years ago I replaced the Michelin tyres on an Astra with remoulds. I got almost the same mileage out of them. Recently I had for the first time 4 new same make tyres on my BMW 530. They are Goodyear F1s. After a few hundred miles I got a non repairable puncture in one. At over £130 pounds each I was very unhappy and of course could not bear to have a non matching cheaper replacement. But never again. It will be budget or mid range tyres for me.

Peter
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Stuartli
>,,and took several miles to become round>>

How exactly did you know?
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - gordonbennet
How exactly did you know?


Imagine driving on threepenny bits for a few miles and then as the tyres warmed, they would round off and all good.
Horrible feeling though, like all the wheels were off balance, obviously where the car was stood overnight the tyres would flatten out.
Expensive premium tyres too, which to be fair were brilliant once warm, powerful grip in any weather except snow and ice.

My sons mate bought some of these to put on his tuned Cupra despite my lad telling him about the cold grip, blessed car was terrible till the tyres got warm, wheelspin at the slightest provocation, glad in a way it wasn't just me.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Lud
I seem to remember that with any Alfasud derivative, the instruction book told you that not just the tyres but the suspension had to warm up before they would work properly.

I love that sort of thing. Proper car stuff.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - gordonbennet
not just the tyres but the suspension had to warm up before they would work
properly.


Thats nice on a machine for pleasure Lud, but not quite so useful on a car you go 10 miles to work in and it takes 6 to get the tyres and suspension warm.

I'm not sure how long it would take the dampers etc to warm up enough to thin the oil to normal viscosity, does it make a difference? Surely the cold must make a difference to damper rates.
Am i right also in thinking that most springs break during the extreme cold as well.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Lud
I know gb, we are so used to instant obedience and serviceability that we expect it as of right. Of course Alfasuds drove OK with cold suspension, they just didn't feel as good as they did after a few miles. They weren't skittish or anything.

But what of our soggy turn-it-on-and-drive-off sogmobiles? Probably they get even soggier when the suspension and tyres warm up, but we hardly notice in the general environment of mimsing sog... :o}

I am still wedded to the idea of the automobile as a machine, a complex and beguiling mechanical device with some of the qualities of a live entity. Sentimental of me I know.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Alby Back
I am finding this all strangely encouraging. My Mondeo is all sort of wafty and smooth over bumps from the moment you start off. We live in area vastly over provided with speed humps. My Signum which is alleged to be the "sports" derivative and has harder suspension etc is much more petulant at the beginning of a journey. It creaks and groans its way over the speed humps and you can tell that it simply does not approve of them. After it has completed a day's work though, it skips over them without a murmer. I wonder if it bears out GBs theory re the tyres needing to warm up and or Lud's re the suspension needing to flex a bit before it feels right?

To head off the obvious question at the pass, I have had the Vauxhall checked out and it has no suspension problems which require attention. It just feels a bit arthritic until it gets into its stride as opposed to the Ford which seems to do mornings better.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Alby Back
Oh, and the Mondeo has Pirelli P7s on and the Signum has Goodyear Eagle NCT5s on it in case this lines up with your theory GB.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - gordonbennet
Oh and the Mondeo has Pirelli P7s on and the Signum has Goodyear Eagle NCT5s
on it in case this lines up with your theory GB.


So much for the Chinese ditchfinders you thought of trying out on the signum then HB..;)

I wonder if the Mondeo is on 16" sensible size tyres as against the signum on 17" low proffs, interesting that you've noticed such a difference once the Signums well warmed up though.
We are still shifting hundreds of ex fleet cars at the mo and i can tell without looking which of the vectra's is on 16" instead of 17" just putting them on the truck. (hundreds of vectra estates but one signum only so far, very rare car)

You really notice this tyre give thing when driving black cabs, those narrow deep sidewalled tyres give a magic carpet ride regardless of temperature.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Alby Back
Both cars on 17s GB. The Goodyears are still the old ones, jury still out on Asian cheapies.....I know what I'll do in the end, which is to buy decent ones, but I'll probably only bring myself to that expenditure decision on the day. Still have suffient Scots Calvinist mean spiritedness in my genetic make up to resent any expenditure which can be measured in 3 figures.......
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - gordonbennet
Scots Calvinist mean spiritedness in my genetic make up to resent any expenditure
which can be measured in 3 figures.......


Whether its the Irish or Cheshire stubborness in my blood, but i can probably beat you for careful pre planning here Humph, for the past few months i would have been trawling various places and sites for that bargain special and would already have them in stock or guaranteed supply/fit price.....plan ahead for the best price Scotty..;)

Just out of interest it was the same tyre make but different more sporty model that i took off the MB for the cold weather grip/ cold roundness issue, it probably wouldn't have made the slightest difference to you as your cars cover long distance and they were superb once warm, but most of my running is cold commute on country A roads.
Its on Toyo's now (well it was until i slipped the battered winter wheels on before the salt went down), and the cold issues are history, but road noise/ride have suffered, you can't have it all.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - gordonbennet
beguiling mechanical device with some of the qualities of a live entity. Sentimental of
me I know.


I agree with you Lud, i have great affection for vehicles that have been good to me, and i enjoy those sometimes annoying idionsyncrasies that give some cars charm.

And yes much to the disgust of many no doubt, my often unusual cars are female and are treated as such (the pick up isn't but that SWMBO's, however its treated well by her), and i want them to be equally cared for and appreciated when they pass on to new hands.
Maybe that wouldn't be the same with a eurobox clone, and i'm dreading having to get one of those in the future.

Talking about suspension softening up a little has given me food for thought, i've never really given that enough consideration, it's possible it may not be tyres alone that are hard and not so grippy then on those first few miles, the less compliant suspension may have some bearing too.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - Lud
i have great affection for vehicles that have been good to me

A problem of mine in the past has been a soft spot for even the unloved and unlovable, including one or two right spavined old nags... like the public persona projected by the polemical Rattle who I imagine secretly cruising around in a nice high-mileage Lexus...

:o}
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - L'escargot
My XR3i, when new, was fitted with Firestone Firehawk tyres. They made the car pull to one side. Proof? ~ swapping the front wheels side to side made it pull the other way. They were replaced under warranty with Michelins and this cured the problem.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - quizman
My Passat was transformed when I replaced the original Dunlop SP200E tyres to Pirelli P7s. The grip in the wet was much better.
When I changed the P7s to Continentals I did not notice any difference, so IMO the OP is both right and wrong.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - craneboy
Its not so much the performance of cheaper tyres that worries me really. To some extent I can control that by driving more within the limits of the tyre. My main concern is with the actual build quality of some of these brands (particularly some of the mainland Chinese stuff)

Cheaper price means cheaper materials, poor workmanship & fewer quality controls etc. This is what should be in the back of most peoples minds when they are ploughing down the motorway on those four rubber pressure vessels that centrifugal force is trying its hardest to tear apart.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - jase1
The thing that amuses me about the whole tyre debate, is not so much people like the contributors on this forum, who love their cars and tend to be knowledgeable, but more your everyday schmuck who will happily pay through the nose for that extra 2% of grip a good tyre provides, but then spoils it all with obviously worn mechanicals on the car, and a refusal to replace said tyres until they're at the legal limit.

I generally avoid wherever possible the very cheap tyres, remoulds and part-worns (for no other reason than the build quality questions as craneboy states), but will happily buy Kumhos, Hankooks, Avons etc etc. I don't see a massive difference between these and the Michelins and Goodyears of this world -- BUT, I do notice a massive difference between a recently-run in new tyre and one with 2mm of tread left. Give me a new Durun or Mohawk over a barely-legal Pirelli any day of the week.
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - moonshine {P}
Goodyears of this world -- BUT I do notice a massive difference between a recently-run
in new tyre and one with 2mm of tread left. Give me a new Durun
or Mohawk over a barely-legal Pirelli any day of the week.


That's quite interesting, becuase the tyre with 2mm of tread should give better grip and handling than a new tyre. Unless you are talking about driving in the wet above 40mph?
"I am very pleased with my tyres" Eh? - jase1
That's quite interesting becuase the tyre with 2mm of tread should give better grip and
handling than a new tyre. Unless you are talking about driving in the wet above
40mph?


Pretty much. The differences between tyres are marginal at best at town speeds. However I do a lot of NSL driving round the twisty roads of rural County Durham and have noticed vagueness on low-tread tyres of any make. Replace the tyres with new ones, and the car feels much more planted.

I try not to push that little bit further to see what happens next ;)
"I am very pleased with my tyres"Eh - quizman
I agree with you craneboy about the quality of some of these cheapo brands.
My BIL bought Endura Runway tyres for his Vectra. I could have got him Michelin HPs for only £20 more, there was a special offer on at Costco, but no he had to buy the cheap ones.
I looked at his tyres the other day, like you do, they were cracking up all around the sidewalls and the front ones looked quite worn. I did not say anything to him, but I hope if I have to brake suddenly on a wet road he is not driving behind me.

The other day a friend of my wife asked me to check her tyres, 3 were 11lbs down the other was 13lbs down. I wonder how many other cars are on the road with underinflated tyres?

Edited by quizman on 09/11/2008 at 10:54

"I am very pleased with my tyres"Eh - Mapmaker
Rich 9-3>>I had a puncture last year and due to circumstances had a single budget tyre
>>fitted and used it for 3 weeks until I could get a pair of my preferred tyres. The
>>budget tyre had notably less grip in the wet and I was happy to get back to my usual tyres.

Really, really, really??? Did you notice that one corner was in the habit of locking? Or that one corner spun the wheels when taking off? I consider myself to be mechanically sensitive, but I'm yet to be convinced that you can really notice these differences.

Oft repeated>>new tyres are quieter than old

Again, I'm surprised. I should have imagined that new tyres, with much deeper tread, are noisier than old. Winter tyres are traditionally noisier than slicks (which is what winter tyres become after 20k miles). A different make may be quieter, but otherwise, snake oil is the only thing quietening the new tyres...

Craneboy>>four rubber pressure vessels that centrifugal force is trying its hardest to tear apart.

Well actually that centripetal force is trying its hardest to make sure they don't tear apart. No such thing as centrifugal force.



Edited by Mapmaker on 10/11/2008 at 12:29

"I am very pleased with my tyres"Eh - moonshine {P}
Oft repeated>>new tyres are quieter than old

Have to agree - I've always found that new tyres make more noise. Only time I've had new tyres that are quiter is when I bought some which had 'trendy' patterns on the tread - the ones that are like slicks with long curved grooves for tread patterns.
"I am very pleased with my tyres"Eh - Group B
Rich 9-3>> budget tyre had notably less grip in the wet
>> Really really really???



Yes I think so. I've owned my car for 4.5 years and I know its little foibles. I commute 50 miles a day, 98% of the time by the same route, dual carriageways and motorway, have done so for 5 years, in all weathers obviously. So if something does not behave as expected, I tend to notice.

I know to make allowances for a new tyre due to greater tread depth and any manufacturing coating needs to scrub off. But I had another pair of new tyres (Hankook) fitted 3 weeks later to compare it with; the budget tyre (Accelera) slipped under acceleration in the wet a number of times when I would not have expected wheelspin. Dont think I had an issue with braking, I didnt push it hard enough. It also squealed once or twice when cornering in the dry, which my normal tyres never do at sane speeds (not forced to be a grip issue but highlights different characteristics).

It is obviously subjective, so take no notice. According to woodbines my opinion is worth nought, because I didn't take the time to measure and record all the variables.

but I'm yet to be convinced that you can really notice these differences.


Maybe you don't drive fast enough? ;o)
"I am very pleased with my tyres"Eh - Lud
Maybe you don't drive fast enough? ;o)


And I suspect him of wearing armoured trousers as well, or at least double-seated ones like rowing shorts...

:o}
"I am very pleased with my tyres"Eh - DP
Bring back the Goodyear Eagle NCT 2. That was a fabulous tyre.
"I am very pleased with my tyres"Eh - midlifecrisis
My Pug 407 coupe has just 14000 miles and the Michelins on the front are down to approx 2mm. I'm pretty disgusted at this. I know the car is pretty nose heavy, but I got 24000m out of the 19" Continentals I had on my Vectra. I don't thrash or abuse it in any way.

They certainly won't be replaced with Michelins if they wear at that rate.
"I am very pleased with my tyres"Eh - Mapmaker
Tyre rubber either sticks to the tyre, or to the road, mlc. Either you drive more miles, or your tyres are grippier.

I guess they're not Michelin Energy - which are famous for being slippery!
"I am very pleased with my tyres"Eh - craneboy
Mapmaker:
To perhaps use a more correct term; Rotational acceleration force has been the enemy of the steel belted radial tyre since its introduction. At high speeds, and particularly when cornering, the belts will flex at their weakest points which are the edges.

over time this flexing can work its way inwards to the centre of the belts. If this happens a catastrophic belt separation can occur. This is why most European "premium brand" manufacturers fit nylon wedges at the belts edges, and in many cases now a full nylon overwrap ply. This nylon ply shrinks as it warms up and effectively holds the other belts together.

Edited by craneboy on 10/11/2008 at 23:09