MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - Ken Flint

Hi again All,

Posted a question at the beginning of last month (oh how so much has changed!) about whether to buy a classic or modern sports car for my retirement. Came out emphatically as modern was the way to go. Got some great suggestions from you guys and I ended up with a list of 9 cars that I was considering. I've managed to get that down to 2: MX5 Mk3 or Merc SLK200

Was wondering if anyone out there has any thoughts, experiences, recommendations about my choices? I'm finding it SO hard to make a decision between the two. My budget is £10K Max. Cheers

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - badbusdriver

The Mazda is a sports car, the Merc more of a sporty cruiser. Personally, between that two, it would be MX5 all day long for me.

But I would suggest waiting till after the Covid 19 crisis has passed and then test drive a couple of examples of each before making your decision.

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - elekie&a/c doctor
Two different animals here . Both are good for their own reasons . But I would suggest you sit in both before you make any decisions. The Slk has a very tight cabin . I’m 6 foot and find it’s interior space poor . I’ve had an Mx5 , and found it more comfortable for my stature , once you’re in . The Slk is not what you would call a sports car , and you certainly don’t want it with the tractor manual gearbox . But they are cheaper with a manual shift . Mx5 would be my choice , but check for corrosion in the chassis and sills . They are notorious for this .
MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - nellyjak
Two different animals here . Both are good for their own reasons . But I would suggest you sit in both before you make any decisions. The Slk has a very tight cabin . I’m 6 foot and find it’s interior space poor . I’ve had an Mx5 , and found it more comfortable for my stature , once you’re in . The Slk is not what you would call a sports car , and you certainly don’t want it with the tractor manual gearbox . But they are cheaper with a manual shift . Mx5 would be my choice , but check for corrosion in the chassis and sills . They are notorious for this .

As above.....MX5 for me, for a more authentic sports car drive at least.

Your budget should steer you clear of any corrosion issues hopefully..but as said..they are different animals and you need to try both to see which actually suits you and your needs the best.

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - Avant

Agreed - you need to try both, and depending on what you're looking for, you'll probably like one more than the other.

£10k will get you a newer MX-5 than it will an SLK, and almost certainly an MX-5 will be more fun, more reliable and cheaper to run. Reliability was no doubt a factor in your choosing modern over classic.

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - Ken Flint

As ever guys, some great advice. Am definitely planning on a few test drives, once all this Covid 19 nonsense is done! Very interesting what you say about the SLK being a sports cruiser. I'm going to have to take a look again at how I'm going to use it. "Sports cruiser" might suit me better as the plan is to bimble round the country lanes of Britain and visit as many walking sites as we can.

Interesting about reliability as well. Does the Merc have issues then?

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - barney100

I have an SLK 172 2012 reg...whisper it 250d... It is a great tourer and eats the miles in comfort. An out and out sports car it ain't but if you fancy a burst on the banjo sport mode makes a good job of making you think it is. It will easily do twice the legal limit and indeed a video of a guy caning one on the autobahns shows what this little Merc can do. I've no experience of the Mazda.

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - 72 dudes

I went from a MKIII MX5 to a SLK, in my case a 350, which I still have. Both were/are third cars, purely for fun days out.

Do try them both, but here are my thoughts.

The MX5 is a pure sports car, handles like a go cart, and the controls are a delight. I had the 1.8 which purists say is sweeter than the 2.0, and although it makes do with a 5 speed box, you can virtually drive it flat out should you wish. So why did I trade it in for a 350?

Well the MX5 is not a great car for long journeys or prolonged periods on the motorway. Mine was the softtop and frankly it's horrible with the roof up. Of course, these cars should be driven roof down whenever possible!

The SLK feels big to drive but is a good deal better in the refinement department. It also handles beautifully and grips like a limpet but the steering doesn't have the wonderful feel and fluidity of the MX5s. The SLK can be driven long distances without arriving feeling like you've done a few rounds with Anthony Joshua.

Now, the engine. FORGET THE SLK200! It's a wheezy old thing which does not suit the character of the car, even in the revised 184 BHP version.

If you go SLK, you need to go with 6 cylinders, so the 3 litre 280/300 depending on age (same engine, different name) or the 3.5 litre 350. Both are fast, the 350 is very fast! There was a V8 engined SLK55 but running costs are stupidly high

Barney100 above has the sole diesel engine the 250 with 204 BHP and that's an alternative, but to me a diesel sports convertible doesn't sit well.

Finally there's the feeling of driving a Merc, and they are special, despite what many naysayers on here will opine!

My 350 has averaged 27.9 MPG overall in my hands, a full 10 less than the MX5. Insurance is £175 per year on a 4000 miles policy. Road tax, well go for a post 2009 facelift example and it's the same as my March 06 model at £325, but avoid the years in between as they're £550. You must find a Mercedes independent specialist near you to avoid high dealer costs.

Reliability for both cars is top drawer. Both are well built, but while the MX5 interior is full of scratchy plastics, the SLKs is sumptuous.

Perhaps most telling is that I kept the MX5 for 3 years but I've had the SLK350 for over 6 years and counting. I do occasionally miss that go cart quality though!

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - Ken Flint

Massive thanks for that 72 dudes. Looks like you've come from exactly the same place as me.

My thoughts have definitely been moving in the same direction as you. Yet again I am going to have to sit down and have a long hard think about how and when I am actually going to use it. As our intention is to tour as much of the UK as we can and engage in our favourite past time of country walking, there may well be a few miles involved. I'm not a great lover of motorway driving at the best of times so had always planned to try and create routes to avoid them where possible. Having said that the miles still have to be covered one way or another.

One of my decisions along the way has been to definitely to go for a hard top. I don't particularly like the feel being inside a soft top when it's up, as well as the noise. I also have the impression they can be a b***** to keep clean.

Very interesting what you say about avoiding the SLK200. Is the Kompressor not got a bit more grunt? Although I have heard they can be noisy

Your specifics about which SLK to look at are amazingly helpful. Thank you very much for that.

Ah well looks like I might be amending my saved searches!

Once Covid 19 is dead and buried I'll be getting out there for a few test drives for sure. Cheers

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - 72 dudes

You're welcome Ken.

It's not so much that the 200 Kompressor is short of grunt, it's not, but it's the way it delivers the power. It feels lethargic with a fairly soft throttle response, but it does go well when you push hard.

Of course, this uses more fuel and narrows the economy gap between it and the 6 cylinder engines. And it sounds quite coa*** whereas the 280 and 350 make an addictive muted howl as you get past medium revs. They're turbine smooth and so relaxing if you just want to bimble around.

The 200 has a 5 speed auto box, whereas the 6 cylinder models use the excellent 7G 7 speed auto.

Enjoy the searching when all this is over and do let us know what you decide.

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - barney100

Diesel dosen't sit well with many for a sports car and I can understand that! The 350 is the best performer and I'm jealous of that lovely engine.

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - John F

If you don't want a soft top and prefer a sports cruiser, have you considered a Lexus SC? They are amazing value for money and would probably be my first choice if I ever decided to dispose of my TR7.

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - badbusdriver

If you don't want a soft top and prefer a sports cruiser, have you considered a Lexus SC? They are amazing value for money and would probably be my first choice if I ever decided to dispose of my TR7.

When the SC first came out i really didn't like them at all thinking they were both ugly and ill proportioned!.

However, fast forward nearly 20 years, maybe it is because i am older, maybe my priorities have changed, but i like them now!. So, from my own perspective, were i wanting a convertible (and could afford the fuel that 4.3 V8 would drink), i'd be having a good long look at one of them. The legendary build quality and reliability, along with the simple fact that they are a bit different from the usual candidates in this class, and the effortless urge provided by that 282bhp engine is an added bonus of course!.

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - Ken Flint

Hi John, the SC was on my list but to be honest the styling wasn't my favourite ;(

I'm kind of set on where I am now as it's taken me ages to create my original list of 9 possible and then actually start whittling it down! Cheers

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - John F

Hi John, the SC was on my list but to be honest the styling wasn't my favourite ;(

I'm kind of set on where I am now as it's taken me ages to create my original list of 9 possible and then actually start whittling it down! Cheers

I would also consider the deeply unfashionable Chrysler Crossfire as reliable mechanics are more important to me than 'styling'. So despite the bargains to be had perhaps this isn't on your list either!

MX5/SLK200 - Sports Car Choice - badbusdriver

Hi John, the SC was on my list but to be honest the styling wasn't my favourite ;(

I'm kind of set on where I am now as it's taken me ages to create my original list of 9 possible and then actually start whittling it down! Cheers

I would also consider the deeply unfashionable Chrysler Crossfire as reliable mechanics are more important to me than 'styling'. So despite the bargains to be had perhaps this isn't on your list either!

Interesting suggestion again john, but especially pertinent since the Crossfire is basically a re-bodied first gen SLK!.