ANY - RIP DOT3? - edlithgow

Here in Taiwan anyway. IIRC I bought this (just emptied) bottle at RT-Mart. Supermarkets don’t sell brake fluid any more AFAIK, and its a bit surprising they ever did, since there is no Taiwanese DIY.

https://forumosa-12829.kxcdn.com/uploads/default/optimized/3X/4/3/4326d15908b29ff9

eac09d103db0ef780e3fe176_2_666x500.jpeg


Anyway, since I never learn, I was quietly confident of getting it at a CPC filling station.

5 big helpings of the M-word from 5 different filling stations later, I’m thinking they’'ve maybe stopped making it.


Since its better than DOT-4 (less hygroscopic so longer service and storage life, higher viscosity) and quite a lot cheaper, I suppose its demise was predictable. May have to change to DOT 4.

Taiwanese seem to use ground coffee (Free Honda Accord reservoir screen)

https://forumosa-12829.kxcdn.com/uploads/default/optimized/3X/2/6/2612a987001377198

b2f712eb9b1e1099bd8f7be_2_666x500.jpeg

Edited by edlithgow on 04/08/2020 at 11:45

ANY - RIP DOT3? - focussed

"since there is no Taiwanese DIY"

Can you expand on that please? Are the Taiwanese so minted that they can't be bothered to do any car DIY or is it officially discouraged?

An engineering culture in Taiwan must exist as a lot of high quality engineering kit is made there and is quite highly regarded here in GB. Vertex brand stuff etc.

ANY - RIP DOT3? - paul 1963

Dot 3 is still available here, you can however mix dot 4 with 3, dot 4 and dot 5 contain borate ester that increases there boiling point..

ANY - RIP DOT3? - edlithgow

I daresay DOT 4 would/will be OK, but for my purposes DOT 3 is better, because:-

Its specified. I don't mind deviating from spec if think I have a reason to, but I do mind deviating from spec if I think I have a reason not to.

It is less hygroscopic than DOT 4.

Water absorption limits the life of brake fluid in service and storage, and is a particular issue here because the average humidity is very high.

It is more viscous than DOT 4. This implies that it will be a better lubricant, which is likely to be relevant on the old and neglected systems I deal with.

Its about 2/3 the price. This isn't a very big deal, but I deal with systems that have been "maintained" by Taiwanese, and thus need extensive flushing, so it adds up.

I understand that the lower viscosity of DOT4 is supposed to allow some ABS and traction control systems to cycle rapidly. I of course don't have ABS or traction control systems on the Skywing. I THINK the free Honda Accord, which I may still end up looking after, probably has ABS but Honda specified DOT3 with no option for it, so they presumably didn't think DOT4 offered any advantage in this case.

The higher DOT4 wet and dry boiling points are of negligable relevance to me since I don't race

ANY - RIP DOT3? - Andrew-T

It is more viscous than DOT 4. This implies that it will be a better lubricant, which is likely to be relevant on the old and neglected systems I deal with.

Sorry, Ed - I'm wondering why more viscous brake fluid is a benefit ? Are you thinking about leaks ? What is being lubricated ?

ANY - RIP DOT3? - edlithgow

It is more viscous than DOT 4. This implies that it will be a better lubricant, which is likely to be relevant on the old and neglected systems I deal with.

Sorry, Ed - I'm wondering why more viscous brake fluid is a benefit ? Are you thinking about leaks ? What is being lubricated ?

Er, anything internal to the system that moves. Mostly pistons in bores and rubber seals. I suppose there might be a minor reduction in leakage due to viscosity too but I doubt thats very significant.

ANY - RIP DOT3? - Andrew-T

It is more viscous than DOT 4. This implies that it will be a better lubricant, which is likely to be relevant on the old and neglected systems I deal with.

Sorry, Ed - I'm wondering why more viscous brake fluid is a benefit ? Are you thinking about leaks ? What is being lubricated ?

Er, anything internal to the system that moves. Mostly pistons in bores and rubber seals. I suppose there might be a minor reduction in leakage due to viscosity too but I doubt thats very significant.

Liquids are traditionally incompressible, but I would have thought viscosity might perhaps affect the response time of the system, and relaxation time on releasing the pedal. Again, only marginal ?

ANY - RIP DOT3? - edlithgow

It is more viscous than DOT 4. This implies that it will be a better lubricant, which is likely to be relevant on the old and neglected systems I deal with.

Sorry, Ed - I'm wondering why more viscous brake fluid is a benefit ? Are you thinking about leaks ? What is being lubricated ?

Er, anything internal to the system that moves. Mostly pistons in bores and rubber seals. I suppose there might be a minor reduction in leakage due to viscosity too but I doubt thats very significant.

Liquids are traditionally incompressible, but I would have thought viscosity might perhaps affect the response time of the system, and relaxation time on releasing the pedal. Again, only marginal ?

I'd think marginal to the point of being undetectable by Vertexes finest instrumentation. In a trad braking system the fluid displacement is tiny so viscous drag seems unlikely to be an issue.

If I crash due to slow braking its likely to be down to my slow NCV due to polyneuropathy, and poor lubrication in my arthritic knee joints rather than the brake fluids fault.

ABS and traction control systems with pumps and such, maybe. Dunno much about them, never having had them.

ANY - RIP DOT3? - edlithgow

"since there is no Taiwanese DIY"

Can you expand on that please? Are the Taiwanese so minted that they can't be bothered to do any car DIY or is it officially discouraged?

An engineering culture in Taiwan must exist as a lot of high quality engineering kit is made there and is quite highly regarded here in GB. Vertex brand stuff etc.

I typed out an outline of a Masters Thesis on this, enlivened with personal anecdotes, vivid cross cultural illustrations, and insightful socio-economic analysis, then it all disappeared. Cannot believe I'm STILL doing that.

Short version: There isn't any because mechanics are cheap and manual work is looked down on by the better healed segment of the population. This produces a culture of kak-handedness.

Though this is partly down to Chinese Culture, I'd speculate it isn't so very different from what is happening elsewhere. The Taiwanese are just a bit ahead of the curve.

Edited by edlithgow on 05/08/2020 at 12:11

ANY - RIP DOT3? - galileo

Ed, my mate who owns and runs an independent garage with his brother often tells me horror stories of customers whose three years old cars are towed in seized with no oil in the sump.

Customer says "there was a little picture of an oil can on the dash, did that mean something?"

Cars arrive for MOT with bald or underinflated tyres, lights not working, wiper blades in shreds.

You would not believe how ignorant many otherwise highly educated people are about elementary features of car mechanics here. The exceptions tend to be the older generation, though not all of them are well clued up.

ANY - RIP DOT3? - edlithgow

You would not believe how ignorant many otherwise highly educated people are about elementary features of car mechanics here. The exceptions tend to be the older generation, though not all of them are well clued up.

Yeh, I knew a girl in the UK who referred to me as an OA.

Stands for Oily Anachronism, though its probably not an accident that its also the first 2 letters of OAP.

She could be a bit of a sarky cow.

ANY - RIP DOT3? - focussed

Replying to my own post here:-

Vertex Machinery and Tools

Vertex Machinery established in 1978 is based out of Taiwan and is known for The Best High Precision Machinery, Milling Machine Accessories, and NC/CNC Machine Tool Accessories. Founder and CEO of Vertex, Steve Huang, established the company in a small factory in the 1970’s and it has grown to be one of the biggest trading companies in Taiwan. Their product line includes the best Milling Vises, Rotary Tables, Punch Formers, Indexing Spacers, Radius and Angle Dressers, Punch Grinders, Toolmakers Vises, Wheel Balance Stands, Universal Dividing Heads and Vertical Slotting Heads. Vertex Machinery is a complete total solution for many of your Metalworking needs. Many companies in the same category as Vertex have their tools manufactured in China. This is not the case with Vertex. Their best Machine Tools are only manufactured in Taiwan. The difference is definitely noticeable. Taiwan has been known to manufacture tools that are better in quality than tools made in China. There always is a premium on Tools and Machinery that come out of Taiwan. It is known for producing tools better and Vertex Machinery insists that everything with the Vertex name on it is still Made in Taiwan. Vertex offers attractive prices and the best quality to serve its loyal customer base throughout the world. Anything produced must pass strict inspection. They are ISO 9001 Certified and Tools are made with tolerance within ±0.01 per 100mm. Also, their tools have a 1 year warranty. Penn Tool Co., is one of the few select companies in the United States that supplies the best Vertex Tools and Machinery. We are sure you will be satisfied with the workmanship of the Vertex brand of tools. They are dedicated to customer satisfaction. Their motto is “Cooperative-Accuracy-Responsibility-Speed.

ANY - RIP DOT3? - edlithgow

Well, yeh.

But they would say that, wouldn't they?

Taiwan does make some good stuff, though you can't always find stuff they export available for sale here. I'll look out for it..

This isn't really incompatible with a lack of maintenance though, and certainly not incompatible with a lack of DIY maintenance, which was the context.

That wee compressor I recently sort-of revived is perhaps illustrative. I got someone in the academic office to translate an email to the manufacturer and got a reponse in Chinese which I'm told says essentially "We know nothing, but we can send an engineer" (Unclear if they'd charge for this, or why I would want one of thier gineers if they know nothing).

The machine seemed well made but the assumption seemed to be that it would be thrown away rather than repaired, and it clearly hadn't been maintained.

ANY - RIP DOT3? - edlithgow

That wee compressor I recently sort-of revived is perhaps illustrative. I got someone in the academic office to translate an email to the manufacturer and got a reponse in Chinese which I'm told says essentially "We know nothing, but we can send an engineer" (Unclear if they'd charge for this, or why I would want one of thier gineers if they know nothing). .

Bit more on this (OT but this threads all over the place anyway).

"Since the compressor seems somehow fixed in your hands, let's just wait and see how the company responds. The customer service lady didn't know how to do with your questions, so she asked for help from her boss, Director Ou. I replied to Mr. Ou and directly let him know that we concern about the consultant fee if they send somebody to come. If it's free, of course, we will gladly accept their kindness! "

(I corrected the last bit since I didn't really want even a free engineer)

So Customer Service is firmly in suits and skirts territory, (as are, of course, Sales) and, faced with some simple technical questions, the ""escalation parh" isn't a direct enquiry to engineering (heaven forfend) who could perhaps just have, like, answered them, but to a senior suit.

The senior suit doesn't relay the questions to engineering because he doesn't do detail. That's for underlings. (He may also want to charge out the engineer, of course)

He'll will, however, send an engineer, who will arrive quite unecessarily in the dark about what he's there for.

Too much negative bias? Maybe so, but I've been that engineer, when I worked for a US-based multinational, and so I dont think this malaise (which is what I think it is) is restricted to Taiwan, though they are perhaps culturally primed for it.

ANY - RIP DOT3? - edlithgow

Apparently still available online.

Unclear at the moment whether they are still making it or this is old stock disposal.

Probably don't need to know, since I'd guess stockpiling brake fluid is perhaps a bad idea anyway.

ANY - RIP DOT3? - Andrew-T

I'd guess stockpiling brake fluid is perhaps a bad idea anyway.

A lot safer than stockpiling ammonium nitrate .....

ANY - RIP DOT3? - edlithgow

I'd guess stockpiling brake fluid is perhaps a bad idea anyway.

A lot safer than stockpiling ammonium nitrate .....

Dunno about that. I've had a total brake failure due to wet brake fluid (though admittedly this fluid was in a long-neglected braking system rather than a long-sealed bottle) and it didn't feel very safe.

OTOH I've never been blown up by a spontaneous ammonium nitrate explosion, though I've used it a few times in combination with PE4 or dynamite.

I have been on many trips through the British countryside where the horizon was completely unblemished by exploding farms.

The RE used to make ANFO by mixing it with diesel in a cement mixer. I'm told the ICI rep was a bit nervous about that, but it was an SOP.

I think its relatively insentitive.

Edited by edlithgow on 06/08/2020 at 12:02

ANY - RIP DOT3? - Andrew-T

<< I think it [ammonium nitrate]'s relatively insensitive. >>

Perhaps the authorities in Beirut (if there are any) thought so too.

ANY - RIP DOT3? - edlithgow

<< I think it [ammonium nitrate]'s relatively insensitive. >>

Perhaps the authorities in Beirut (if there are any) thought so too.

Storing really massive amounts of the stuff in a dense city carries some pretty obvious risks. Not as obvious as, say, building a Westinghouse stylee PWR in an earthquake zone, (or anywhere on Planet Earth for that matter) but still fairly obvious.

Perhaps if you are a Beiruti of a certain age, the certain age that tends to go with authority, you've seen so many deliberately targetted lethal explosions that accidental ones are not so prominent on your mental radar.

My understanding is that this explosion followed a warehouse fire. If so it wouldn't require sensitivity on the part of the explosive.

Edited by edlithgow on 07/08/2020 at 00:22

ANY - RIP DOT3? - galileo

<< I think it [ammonium nitrate]'s relatively insensitive. >>

Perhaps the authorities in Beirut (if there are any) thought so too.

Storing really massive amounts of the stuff in a dense city carries some pretty obvious risks. Not as obvious as, say, building a Westinghouse stylee PWR in an earthquake zone, (or anywhere on Planet Earth for that matter) but still fairly obvious.

Perhaps if you are a Beiruti of a certain age, the certain age that tends to go with authority, you've seen so many deliberately targetted lethal explosions that accidental ones are not so prominent on your mental radar.

My understanding is that this explosion followed a warehouse fire. If so it wouldn't require sensitivity on the part of the explosive.

My chemistry textbook (1961 date) says that ammonium nitrate deflagrates when ignited but once it reaches 250 C it detonates.

1960 A level practical exam involved heating small samples of 'unknown' substances in a in ignition tube, the lucky candidate given this as a sample was rewarded with a harmless crack.

ANY - RIP DOT3? - edlithgow

Apparently still available online.

Unclear at the moment whether they are still making it or this is old stock disposal.

Probably don't need to know, since I'd guess stockpiling brake fluid is perhaps a bad idea anyway.

Pending an Internyet order I syringed the brake fluid out of the Skywing reservoir to top up the Accord.

Felt a bit like using one of your kids as an organ donor for another one, only not so unimaginably awful.

Skywing stuff is fairly recent, and had only a little black stuff in the bottom, probably seal wear. Accord (before flushing) was liquid rust concentrate, probably everything wear.

That got the brake alarm to go out.

I'd found the docuiments in a cubby-hole so I took it in to a private centre for inspection, since the majority Taiwanese opinion was that the inspection was too long overdue and so it couldn't be re-registered. which would mean I was wasting my time.

Majority Taiwanese opinion in this case was wrong (as it often is, but having seen some English translations of Taiwan Govt regulations I doubt they are much clearer in the original smoke and mirrors version).but they couldn't inspect it because the insurance had expired. Majority Taiwanese opinion had assured me this would be no problem," just re-insure in your name", but majority Taiwanese opinion in this case was wrong again.

Might need to go back with a translator.

Still got the same CEL but wasn't able to find out if they were likely to care about that.

Edited by edlithgow on 10/08/2020 at 04:56